Think P&S's only suck at high ISO?
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Robert Coe on 24 Sep 2009 20:25 On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:30:28 -0400, "Bowser" <up(a)gone.now> wrote: : : : "Robert Spanjaard" <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote in message : news:d9968$4abbb2fb$5469b618$12818(a)cache80.multikabel.net... : > On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:52:36 -0400, Bowser wrote: : > : >>> Think again. Here's a $600 Canon Powershot SX1 versus an Olympus E-620 : >>> ($799, two zoom lens kit) at 200 ISO. : >>> : >>> http://www.pbase.com/image/117651018 : >> : >> I guess the fact that a P&S user considers ISO 200 high speaks volumes. : > : > I can't see the images right now, because pbase.com is down. But I think : > you misread the subject. To be more precise: you missed the "only" part. : : I've *got* to cut down on caffeine. No, NO!! Caffeine SHARPENS the senses. You're probably not quaffing enough of it! Bob
From: Robert Coe on 24 Sep 2009 20:28 On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:14:23 +0200, Robert Spanjaard <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote: : On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:30:28 -0400, Bowser wrote: : : >> I can't see the images right now, because pbase.com is down. But I : >> think you misread the subject. To be more precise: you missed the : >> "only" part. : > : > I've *got* to cut down on caffeine. : : The problem is, you never know. Maybe you need *more* caffeine. As I just told Bowse before reading your reply! Great minds think alike. (Or is it just great photographic minds?) Obviously, Friday cannot come quick enough this weekl. Bob
From: Robert Spanjaard on 24 Sep 2009 21:26 On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:28:08 -0400, Robert Coe wrote: > : >> I can't see the images right now, because pbase.com is down. But I > : >> think you misread the subject. To be more precise: you missed the : > >> "only" part. > : > > : > I've *got* to cut down on caffeine. : > : The problem is, you never know. Maybe you need *more* caffeine. > > As I just told Bowse before reading your reply! Great minds think alike. > (Or is it just great photographic minds?) Great minds use standard quote-characters, and read a discussion before adding their own thoughts. -- Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com
From: Bowser on 25 Sep 2009 15:45 "Robert Spanjaard" <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote in message news:44855$4abbe12f$5469b618$325(a)cache70.multikabel.net... > On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:30:28 -0400, Bowser wrote: > >>> I can't see the images right now, because pbase.com is down. But I >>> think you misread the subject. To be more precise: you missed the >>> "only" part. >> >> I've *got* to cut down on caffeine. > > The problem is, you never know. Maybe you need *more* caffeine. Good idea. I'd hate to cut back, anyway. Back in a while, I'm heading to the local supermarket for a case of Coke Black.
From: Bowser on 25 Sep 2009 15:46
"Robert Coe" <bob(a)1776.COM> wrote in message news:6c3ob553e6nkh5j9eiar1r7k0a506anps3(a)4ax.com... > On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:30:28 -0400, "Bowser" <up(a)gone.now> wrote: > : > : > : "Robert Spanjaard" <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote in message > : news:d9968$4abbb2fb$5469b618$12818(a)cache80.multikabel.net... > : > On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:52:36 -0400, Bowser wrote: > : > > : >>> Think again. Here's a $600 Canon Powershot SX1 versus an Olympus > E-620 > : >>> ($799, two zoom lens kit) at 200 ISO. > : >>> > : >>> http://www.pbase.com/image/117651018 > : >> > : >> I guess the fact that a P&S user considers ISO 200 high speaks > volumes. > : > > : > I can't see the images right now, because pbase.com is down. But I > think > : > you misread the subject. To be more precise: you missed the "only" > part. > : > : I've *got* to cut down on caffeine. > > No, NO!! Caffeine SHARPENS the senses. You're probably not quaffing enough > of > it! I can only thank god that you and Robert were here to talk me back into my senses. Once I've completed my extensive expirements with Coke Black, I'll let you know. |