From: Nial Stewart on
"Gary Brown" <garyjbrown(a)charter.net> wrote in message
news:DuudnaBgtZ6mKezWnZ2dnUVZ_rSdnZ2d(a)supernews.com...
> Hi,
> I am new to Altera's Quartus II. During design I often want to define a block's inputs and
> outputs but leave all or part of the design for latter. Unfortunately, just leaving inputs or
> outputs dangling generates warnings that can bury useful warnings. I haven't found a solution for
> this. I posed the question in Altera's Quartus II forum without a result. Does someone here have
> a solution to this?


In the output window click on one of the warnings, right click and
you can select to mask off similar warnings.


> FWIW: Has anyone else had bug problems? In the week or so I've been using it it faulted twice,
> bombed once, and occasionly exhibited some unintentional behavior.


Not really, I've been using Quartus since it came out and it's
generally been very stable (specially since it became Quartus II).

BTW comp.arch.fpga is probably a better newsgroup for this type of
question.


Nial.


From: Gary Brown on
>> I am new to Altera's Quartus II. During design I often want
>> to define a block's inputs and outputs but leave all or part
>> of the design for latter. Unfortunately, just leaving inputs
>> or

> In the output window click on one of the warnings, right click
> and
> you can select to mask off similar warnings.

That helps.

>> FWIW: Has anyone else had bug problems? In the week or so
>> I've been using it it faulted twice, bombed once, and
>> occasionly exhibited some unintentional behavior.
>
>
> Not really, I've been using Quartus since it came out and it's
> generally been very stable (specially since it became Quartus
> II).

It hung on me yesterday - the fourth fatal bug in five days of
usage. I'm a former CAD programmer also so am both sympathetic
and unsympathetic.

> BTW comp.arch.fpga is probably a better newsgroup for this
> type of
> question.

Thanks for the suggestion. Will go there.

>
> Nial.
>
>


From: Jim Thompson on
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:26:19 -0500, "Gary Brown"
<garyjbrown(a)charter.net> wrote:

>>> I am new to Altera's Quartus II. During design I often want
>>> to define a block's inputs and outputs but leave all or part
>>> of the design for latter. Unfortunately, just leaving inputs
>>> or
>
>> In the output window click on one of the warnings, right click
>> and
>> you can select to mask off similar warnings.
>
>That helps.
>
>>> FWIW: Has anyone else had bug problems? In the week or so
>>> I've been using it it faulted twice, bombed once, and
>>> occasionly exhibited some unintentional behavior.
>>
>>
>> Not really, I've been using Quartus since it came out and it's
>> generally been very stable (specially since it became Quartus
>> II).
>
>It hung on me yesterday - the fourth fatal bug in five days of
>usage. I'm a former CAD programmer also so am both sympathetic
>and unsympathetic.
>
>> BTW comp.arch.fpga is probably a better newsgroup for this
>> type of
>> question.
>
>Thanks for the suggestion. Will go there.
>
>>
>> Nial.
>>
>>
>

What I did in PSpice to cope with such no-connect/float issues was to
make a couple of _TINY_ symbols "HIGH" and "LOWW" ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
From: MooseFET on
On Feb 10, 10:26 am, "Gary Brown" <garyjbr...(a)charter.net> wrote:
> >> I am new to Altera's Quartus II.  During design I often want
> >> to define a block's inputs and outputs but leave all or part
> >> of the design for latter.  Unfortunately, just leaving inputs
> >> or
> > In the output window click on one of the warnings, right click
> > and
> > you can select to mask off similar warnings.
>
> That helps.
>
> >> FWIW: Has anyone else had bug problems?  In the week or so
> >> I've been using it it faulted twice, bombed once, and
> >> occasionly exhibited some unintentional behavior.
>
> > Not really, I've been using Quartus since it came out and it's
> > generally been very stable (specially since it became Quartus
> > II).
>
> It hung on me yesterday - the fourth fatal bug in five days of
> usage.  I'm a former CAD programmer also so am both sympathetic
> and unsympathetic.

Quartus is worse than Maxplus-2 for the crashes per day.

It also doesn't produce the same resulting fuse map for the
same input file. This means that you can't recompile your old
code to make the same compiled results.


>
> > BTW comp.arch.fpga is probably a better newsgroup for this
> > type of
> > question.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion.  Will go there.
>
>
>
> > Nial.
>
>

From: Nial Stewart on
> It hung on me yesterday - the fourth fatal bug in five days of usage. I'm a former CAD programmer
> also so am both sympathetic and unsympathetic.


I think I can probably count on the fingers of one hand the number of
times it's crashed on me.

What are you running it on, and do you have enough memory (not usually
a problem until you get to big devices)?


Nial