Time for another firewall.
in [Freeware]
|
From: za kAT on 3 Aug 2010 08:21 On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 13:55:18 +0200, HTH wrote: [binned very *flustered* HB] My dear boy, your mind is so totally confused, it's really funny. I'm particularly interested in how you think a NAT router is effective in controlling outbound. > Wrong again. For the regular user, a NAT router controls outbound > perfectly well, but as I mentioned before it usually requires the user > to manually enter the domains/IPs into its rules, otherwise it dosn't > know what outbounds to block. Did you miss that too??? Do tell us how? -- zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - Sergeant Tech-Com, DN38416. Assigned to protect you. You've been targeted for denigration!
From: HTH on 3 Aug 2010 11:14 The floored "za kAT" offered this wibbly counter argument to the great HTH's expert comments about PFWs and NAT routers. And "za kAT" managed to do it all by himself from his super-secret IP: 82.5.94.219: >My dear boy, your mind is so totally confused, it's really funny. yada yada yada. <yawn> >I'm particularly interested in how you think a NAT router is effective >in controlling outbound. >> >> Wrong again. For the regular user, a NAT router controls outbound >> perfectly well, but as I mentioned before it usually requires the >> user to manually enter the domains/IPs into its rules, otherwise it >> dosn't know what outbounds to block. Did you miss that too??? > >Do tell us how? That is explained in my previous post above which you quoted. Duh! It was also mentioned to BB earlier. I suggest you read up. If you are unable to read, let us know. I take it you accept everything else I posted (most of which floored you). HTH
From: Corporal Toots on 3 Aug 2010 17:54 An anonymous Frell user calling himself "HTH" wrote: > > ROTFL. Perhaps you've changed it since you accessed HB's server > a few times. OTOH maybe not. IIUC you now use anonymous surf > websites to access HB's server occasionally, to hide your IP. > How do yer know it wasn't me lookin' at HB's server? Yer a berk. Yer should go far - and the sooner yer start, the better. Cp'l Toots -- i luv snooping yer server
From: HTH on 3 Aug 2010 19:01 An anonymous Frell user calling himself "Corporal Toots/Fritz Wuehler" wrote: >An anonymous Frell user calling himself "HTH" wrote: >> >> ROTFL. Perhaps you've changed it since you accessed HB's server >> a few times. OTOH maybe not. IIUC you now use anonymous surf >> websites to access HB's server occasionally, to hide your IP. >> > > >How do yer know it wasn't me lookin' at HB's server? Because I don't know who you are.
From: za kAT on 4 Aug 2010 09:44
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:29:54 +0200, HTH wrote: > I Repeat: a NAT router can be effectively used to block outgoing, save > that the domains to be blocked have to be manually entered by the user > into the router. That's been made clear to you several times and you've > even quoted it, apparently without understanding it. Duh! How does that effectively block outgoing? I'm a piece of malware. I execute on a host. I make an outgoing connection to whoknowswhere.com or 82.5.94.219 You had no idea I was even going to execute, and certainly no idea where I was going. Your NAT router is useless, which domains are you going to block? Your ruleset will be enormous. Come on, make a real argument. -- zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - Sergeant Tech-Com, DN38416. Assigned to protect you. You've been targeted for denigration! |