From: TBerk on
On Nov 19, 11:28 am, Jeff Liebermann <je...(a)cruzio.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:06:31 -0600, "amdx" <a...(a)knology.net> wrote:
> >Hmm, Prince Jeff, nah.
> >I think we should put him in the position of King.
> >Yes, Let it be done!
> >             Mike :-)
>
> No thanks.  No sane person wants to be king, emperor, president,
> fearless leader, czar, khan, or other head of state.


You ARE related though, right?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emperor_Norton


berk
From: TBerk on
On Nov 19, 12:55 pm, Kurt Ullman <kurtull...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> In article <ob8bg5tvf3feebktbt7shkvgmhbiopg...(a)4ax.com>,
>  Jeff Liebermann <je...(a)cruzio.com> wrote:
>
> > Searching Google for "assassinate ambassador" I find 1,430 hits, which
> > is a bit too much for my personal comfort.  At this time, I don't
> > think we have any friends left in any country, so any country will
> > probably suffice.
>
>    But none when you add Bahamas, St. Kitts, Turks and Caicos, Aruba or
> either Saint-Martin or Sint Maarten. So, if offered I am gonna take it.
>

We're sending you to Haiti, where you're really needed.

berk
From: Jeff Liebermann on
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:13:26 -0800 (PST), TBerk
<bayareaberk(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>You ARE related though, right?
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emperor_Norton
>berk

No, I don't think we're related. However, as you note, there are
simularities. The only point of contact I can recall was my use of
the Emperor Norton Utilities:
<http://singlenesia.com/software/enu>
<http://www.discordia.ch/Programs/>
for posting mutilated rubbish and marginal English to Usenet. This
was the primary source of my writing style and topical inspiration.

I'm fairly certain there will eventually be a revival of the Emperor
Norton style of government. Democracy, republicanism and capitalism
have all run their course and are failing like all the previous
attempts at equality, fairness, stability, and conquest. The only
form that has survived is monarchy which I predict will eventually
make a come back. Given the current quality of government, Emperor
Norton would probably be an improvement.
<http://www.emperornorton.org/1024/ImperialIndex.htm>


--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558
# http://802.11junk.com jeffl(a)cruzio.com
# http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS
From: Moe Trin on
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, in the Usenet newsgroup alt.internet.wireless, in article
<ibacg55vlv8bqt1kqrqnn7p4q4i8ucpli4(a)4ax.com>, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

>Democracy, republicanism and capitalism have all run their course and
>are failing like all the previous attempts at equality, fairness,
>stability, and conquest. The only form that has survived is monarchy
>which I predict will eventually make a come back.

Know your ISO-3166 country codes? Constitutional monarchies:

BE DK JP LI MA NL SE TO
BH ES KH LS MC NO SZ UK
BT JO KW LU MY NP TH WS

``monarchies'':

BN OM QA SA

plus two more that are harder to classify (AE which is a federation
of emirates, and VA). I'm ignoring (mainly) former European colonies
that have the European monarch as symbolic head of state, but actually
are republics or federations. And the model you wish is... ;-)

>Given the current quality of government, Emperor Norton would
>probably be an improvement.

But do we really _need_ a railroad bridge out to the Farallones?[1] Or
is that merely a federal... an imperial "make-work" project?

Old guy

[1] Imperial decree of 18 August 1869 - which ordered the bridge to be
built "at Oakland Point to Yerba Buena, from thence to the mountain
range of Saucilleto (sic), and from thence to the Farallones..." The
decree is often cited as the genesis of the current Oakland Bay and
Golden Gate bridges - the Farallon Islands are small islands about 30
miles / 50 km West of the Golden Gate.
From: Jeff Liebermann on
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:39:34 -0600, ibuprofin(a)painkiller.example.tld
(Moe Trin) wrote:

>On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, in the Usenet newsgroup alt.internet.wireless, in article
><ibacg55vlv8bqt1kqrqnn7p4q4i8ucpli4(a)4ax.com>, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>
>>Democracy, republicanism and capitalism have all run their course and
>>are failing like all the previous attempts at equality, fairness,
>>stability, and conquest. The only form that has survived is monarchy
>>which I predict will eventually make a come back.

>Know your ISO-3166 country codes?

No.
The 11th commandment is: "Thou shalt not abrev".

>Constitutional monarchies:

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_monarchs>

>plus two more that are harder to classify (AE which is a federation
>of emirates, and VA).

Close enough. Hybrids are becoming more popular. Whatever the
sub-type, monarchy is here to stay and shows no evidence of further
decline.

>I'm ignoring (mainly) former European colonies
>that have the European monarch as symbolic head of state, but actually
>are republics or federations. And the model you wish is... ;-)

My favorite model is absolute dictator. Of course, there are a
limited number of such positions available. It would also be nice if
I could run things without violence or elections, but those can be
easily deal with through media suppression and single candidate
elections.

>>Given the current quality of government, Emperor Norton would
>>probably be an improvement.
>
>But do we really _need_ a railroad bridge out to the Farallones?[1] Or
>is that merely a federal... an imperial "make-work" project?

Ummm... You're behind the times. "Make work" was the mantra of the
WPA and the 1929 Depression era public works projects. This is the
21st century and it's now called "job creation" as in the economic
stimulus package. Both are famous for creating highways in the sky,
so expect similar results.

--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558
# http://802.11junk.com jeffl(a)cruzio.com
# http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Folded Dipole Calculator Help
Next: s