Titanomachy
in [Physics]
|
Prev: The Virgin Birth of Points
Next: All Electric AL-h2o2 or Hybrid Electric Hummer @100 empg and Zero NOx
From: Dennis M. Hammes on 30 Nov 2007 02:42 Ned wrote: > "Dennis M. Hammes" <scrawlmark(a)arvig.net> wrote in message > news:6-udnaMEpcIQ5dPanZ2dnUVZ_vCknZ2d(a)onvoy.com... > >>>>>Thus do I never come back, because I have never left. >>>> >>>>Then that means you're stuck here with us. >>>>Don >>> >>>Ah, but alas, the reason I have never left is because I have never >>>been here. >>>Ned >> >>If you have never been here, you might be a Buddhist. >> If you have never been anywhere, you might be a couch potato. >> If you are not here now, /I/ might be a Buddhist. >> > > > I fundamentally do not exist and at the present moment will > not be annihilated. > > Ned > Then watch out for passing satori, since I don't care to see you in the flash. -- -------(m+ ~/:o)_| Gresham's Law is not worth a Continental. http://scrawlmark.org
From: Dennis M. Hammes on 30 Nov 2007 02:46 Ned wrote: > "Dennis M. Hammes" <scrawlmark(a)arvig.net> wrote in message > news:8fqdnXuYrowz7tPanZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d(a)onvoy.com... > >>>>>But one question... If all motion is relative, how does >>>>>the earth know that the moon is revolving around IT, rather >>>>>than IT revolving around the moon? >>>>>Ned >>>> >>>>What does it mean to say that the earth "knows" something? >>>>Don >>> >>>What does it mean to say that one thing goes "around" another >>>thing, when all motion is relative? >> >>Why is relatives' motion "around" each other called a "square" dance? >> > > > Because it's only done by squares, dadyo! > > Ned > Then why are the men so long and the women so round? -- -------(m+ ~/:o)_| Gresham's Law is not worth a Continental. http://scrawlmark.org
From: Dennis M. Hammes on 30 Nov 2007 02:56 Ned wrote: > "Dennis M. Hammes" <scrawlmark(a)arvig.net> wrote in message > news:8fqdnXiYroxB79PanZ2dnUVZ_h-vnZ2d(a)onvoy.com... > >>>But one question... If all motion is relative, how does >>>the earth know that the moon is revolving around IT, rather >>>than IT revolving around the moon? >>>Ned >> >>If all motion is relative, how do you explain teh couch potato? >> > > > Couch potatoes are singularities. They absorb everything and > nothing comes out, not even light. How fast would a singularity > have to spin in order for it to come apart? > > Ned > It already has. Conservation of angular momentum requires that a singularity of zero radius spin at an infinite rate, producing an infinte centrifugal force against a finite gravity. I.e., it's naked because its bra flew off. -- -------(m+ ~/:o)_| Gresham's Law is not worth a Continental. http://scrawlmark.org
From: Dennis M. Hammes on 30 Nov 2007 03:01 Rik wrote: > Ned wrote: > >> "Dennis M. Hammes" <scrawlmark(a)arvig.net> wrote in message >> news:8fqdnXiYroxB79PanZ2dnUVZ_h-vnZ2d(a)onvoy.com... >> >>>> But one question... If all motion is relative, how does >>>> the earth know that the moon is revolving around IT, rather >>>> than IT revolving around the moon? >>>> Ned >>> >>> If all motion is relative, how do you explain teh couch potato? >>> >> >> Couch potatoes are singularities. They absorb everything and >> nothing comes out, not even light. How fast would a singularity >> have to spin in order for it to come apart? >> >> Ned >> >> > You seem to be discounting the volumes of evidence that show couch > potatoes do emit copious amounts of gas. > > Similar to poets, in that respect. > > Rik, knee deep. Is that the sort of couch potato that also emits keystrokes that appear in various places around the universe, the resulting White Holes being noteworthy only as white noise? O O O o o o . . . There. I've emitted a series of Black Holes to counter them. (I'm forever blowing Bubbles, and she LUUves it.) -- -------(m+ ~/:o)_| Gresham's Law is not worth a Continental. http://scrawlmark.org
From: Dennis M. Hammes on 30 Nov 2007 03:03
Ned wrote: > "Rik" <rik(a)kalieda.org> wrote in message > news:ioC3j.41703$JA1.2204(a)fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk... > >>Ned wrote: >> >>>"Dennis M. Hammes" <scrawlmark(a)arvig.net> wrote in message >>>news:8fqdnXiYroxB79PanZ2dnUVZ_h-vnZ2d(a)onvoy.com... >>> >>>>>But one question... If all motion is relative, how does >>>>>the earth know that the moon is revolving around IT, rather >>>>>than IT revolving around the moon? >>>>>Ned >>>> >>>>If all motion is relative, how do you explain teh couch potato? >>> >>>Couch potatoes are singularities. They absorb everything and >>>nothing comes out, not even light. How fast would a singularity >>>have to spin in order for it to come apart? >>>Ned >> >>You seem to be discounting the volumes of evidence that show >>couch potatoes do emit copious amounts of gas. >>Similar to poets, in that respect. >>Rik, knee deep. >> > > > Ah, death where ist thy sting? O Critic, where ist thy victory? > > But seriously, how fast would a singularity have to spin in order > for it to fly apart? > > Ned > If the couch potato is Dockery or chuckles, his fly is /already/ apart. -- -------(m+ ~/:o)_| Gresham's Law is not worth a Continental. http://scrawlmark.org |