Prev: tclkit string size limit?
Next: upvar bad level error
From: Damon Courtney on 22 Jul 2010 19:44 This is a new Tk package I am working on, and I would like some community opinion before offering it up for release. For those who don't follow the wiki, please see: http://wiki.tcl.tk/26699 and comment if you have one.
From: Donal K. Fellows on 25 Jul 2010 11:57 On Jul 23, 12:44 am, Damon Courtney <damon.court...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > This is a new Tk package I am working on, and I would like some > community opinion before offering it up for release. For those who > don't follow the wiki, please see: > > http://wiki.tcl.tk/26699 > > and comment if you have one. Wasn't there a TkX thing back in the bad old days of bigwishes? IIRC, it was a Tcl interpreter with both Tk and TclX extensions built in. I never really used it so I don't know much more about it than that. OTOH, I'd be very happy to expunge that long-obsolete information in favor of whatever you propose. :-) Donal.
From: DTM on 25 Jul 2010 17:07 On Jul 22, 7:44 pm, Damon Courtney <damon.court...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > This is a new Tk package I am working on, and I would like some > community opinion before offering it up for release. For those who > don't follow the wiki, please see: > > http://wiki.tcl.tk/26699 > > and comment if you have one. Here is my perspective as the author of a TCL/TK GUI code generating tool (TKproE). In general, I don't like megawidget packages. Properly determining and saving the TCL/TK code necessary to reproduce the megawidget items tends to be very difficult. Dennis LaBelle
From: Damon Courtney on 25 Jul 2010 19:24 On Jul 25, 4:07 pm, DTM <gone2cani...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 22, 7:44 pm, Damon Courtney <damon.court...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > This is a new Tk package I am working on, and I would like some > > community opinion before offering it up for release. For those who > > don't follow the wiki, please see: > > >http://wiki.tcl.tk/26699 > > > and comment if you have one. > > Here is my perspective as the author of a TCL/TK GUI code generating > tool (TKproE). > > In general, I don't like megawidget packages. Properly determining and > saving the TCL/TK code necessary to reproduce the megawidget items > tends to be very difficult. > > Dennis LaBelle TkX is designed to make any megawidget look and act exactly as a core widget would. I don't think a megawidget platform is complete without total compatibility with the core. This is where all that I have used in the past fail. I would very much like you take a look once I release it, but I think you'll find that every widget will conform to your expectations. If they don't for some reason; well, that's a bug. 0-] Speaking as someone who has also written a Tcl/Tk IDE (Visual Tcl), I know your pain. I'm trying to relieve some of that. 0-] Damon
From: Damon Courtney on 25 Jul 2010 19:27 On Jul 25, 10:57 am, "Donal K. Fellows" <donal.k.fell...(a)manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > On Jul 23, 12:44 am, Damon Courtney <damon.court...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > This is a new Tk package I am working on, and I would like some > > community opinion before offering it up for release. For those who > > don't follow the wiki, please see: > > >http://wiki.tcl.tk/26699 > > > and comment if you have one. > > Wasn't there a TkX thing back in the bad old days of bigwishes? IIRC, > it was a Tcl interpreter with both Tk and TclX extensions built in. I > never really used it so I don't know much more about it than that. > OTOH, I'd be very happy to expunge that long-obsolete information in > favor of whatever you propose. :-) > > Donal. There was a TkX package that shipped alongside TclX, but I think it was just some helper stuff. TclX did build a wishx in its build that was just Tcl + Tk + TclX, but so did most every major extension back in those days. Blech. I just stole the name because there wasn't a wiki page with the name and because the Tkx is the name of the modern Perl/Tk bridge. Plus it just sounds nice. 0-] D
|
Pages: 1 Prev: tclkit string size limit? Next: upvar bad level error |