From: Jenn on


"PajaP" <pajap(a)news-only.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
news:4krvs59ugaoo7fe6atmqicik8mil0e195s(a)4ax.com...
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 02:02:06 -0400, "Peter Foldes" <okf22(a)hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Jenn
>>
>>Now you brilliantly showed your stupidity with that reply. JD's post flew
>>by you too
>>fast. You call yourself a woman with virtues and smarts. You just showed
>>the
>>opposite . How wonderful.
>
> Peter Foldes, is another friend of pcbuts's from the USA.
> Yes, you have proved it again.


The plot thickens ... lol
--
Jenn (from Oklahoma)
http://pqlr.org/bbs/


From: JD on
PajaP wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:21:47 -0500, JD<JD(a)example.invalid> wrote:
>
>> We do need to inform people of Butts but only when he replies to a new
>> question. And we do that by quickly telling the new person not to rely
>> on Butts. We can all tell when Butts is posting as someone else. Jest
>> say hi Chris, not today.
>
> The *regulars* have proved time and time again they cannot do this.
> They are not replying to warn people away from him. They are replying
> because they think their comment are somehow amusing and like Peter
> FOADs they feel the need for the last word.
>
> What was the point of these most recent comments?
> "You need to see a shrink ASAP"
> "Which woman are you tonight?"
> "How long do you think you can keep this up?"
>
> They really cannot resist pcbutts.
> He has them truly over a barrel.
> Especially Peter FOADs who he has bent over it, squealing like a pig.

Hi Chris, not today.

--
JD..