From: YD on
Late at night, by candle light, Robert Baer <robertbaer(a)localnet.com>
penned this immortal opus:

>YD wrote:
>>
>> OTOH, you and JT are the real champs. Usually a symptom of inferiority
>> complex. It's real easy on usenet since you can froth away without
>> chancing a punch in the nose.
>>
>> - YD.
>...is that why one does not get to see a pool of red electrons forming
>below the keyboard?

:-D

- YD.
--
File corruption detected. Select option:
1 - Call the cops
2 - Call the press
3 - Bribe it

Remove HAT if replying by mail.
From: JosephKK on
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:16:59 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodboat(a)yahoo.com wrote:

>On Jun 11, 10:02 am, John Larkin
><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:34:33 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodb...(a)yahoo.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Jun 10, 11:45 pm, dagmargoodb...(a)yahoo.com wrote:
>> >> John Larkin wrote:
>> >> > dagmargoodb...(a)yahoo.com wrote:
>> >> > >John Larkin  wrote:
>>
>> >> > >> The transformer ratio gets involved some, too.
>>
>> >> > >Yep, but to a 1rst order: average emitter voltage = 0, ignore the
>> >> > >swing 'cause it's small, and that gets you pretty close.  V(b) = 120mV
>> >> > >in my 5KHz example.
>>
>> >> > How much p-p voltage on the emitter?
>>
>> >> 1 volt.  That might be a bit hot, as I noted in the post.  I did that
>> >--^^^^^^
>>
>> >Ooops.  That was for another sim, which uses 1mH and 10uH.  The posted
>> >5 KHz ckt used 1mH / 25uH, so the emitter swing was about 1.8v p-p.
>>
>>
>> That's savage.
>>
>> John
>
>If you don't mind, I prefer "barbarian."
>
>James


So you like red beards.?