From: victoria Bippart on
I don't get his notation, either, but
he must be trying to insert his "internal momentum" ****
into some sort of mathematical form.

so, when he patents his warp drive,
he'll just have to be careful about travel "in" time --
and his mama!

thus:
is ten to the 500th power, like,
longer than the volume of Known Universe Total Quanta?

thus:
the clocks are distorted by the curvature that was demonstrated
by Aristarchus, and surveyed o'er Alsace-Lorraine by Gauss
(with his theodolite .-) yes, time is not a dimension, or
it is the only dimension, whereby we observe the others (Bucky's
formulation).

not only was Newton's law actually found by Hooke, but
it was derived directly from Kepler's orbital constraints (and,
Kepler thought that Sun was perhaps magnetic on planets,
which may-well turn out to be more accurate than "gravitons" --
as long as you get rid of Newton's silly corpuscles, "photons" --
and his platonic ordering of the planets has alos proved
to be more-or-less correct (if I could find that article,
that gave a formula that was effective for all moons, as well).

BTW, use quaternions for special rel.,
which shows the uniqueness of the "real, scalar, inner product" time/
dimension of Hamilton.

--Light: A History!
http://21stcenturysciencetech.com
From: Mahipal7638 on
On Apr 15, 3:36 pm, victoria Bippart <vickybipp...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't get his notation, either, but
> he must be trying to insert his "internal momentum" ****
> into some sort of mathematical form.

Either? You are projecting that I don't get "his" notation. Don't
bother. I'm not notationally challenged.

> so, when he patents his warp drive,
> he'll just have to be careful about travel "in" time --
> and his mama!

Patents are quite a ways short of Reality. Are you his mama?

> thus:
> is ten to the 500th power, like,
> longer than the volume of Known Universe Total Quanta?

So you've computed an exponential.

> thus:
> the clocks are distorted by the curvature that was demonstrated
> by Aristarchus, and surveyed o'er Alsace-Lorraine by Gauss
> (with his theodolite .-)  yes, time is not a dimension, or
> it is the only dimension, whereby we observe the others (Bucky's
> formulation).

Stop typing.

> not only was Newton's law actually found by Hooke, but
> it was derived directly from Kepler's orbital constraints (and,
> Kepler thought that Sun was perhaps magnetic on planets,
> which may-well turn out to be more accurate than "gravitons" --
> as long as you get rid of Newton's silly corpuscles, "photons" --
> and his platonic ordering of the planets has alos proved
> to be more-or-less correct (if I could find that article,
> that gave a formula that was effective for all moons, as well).

Alos, only if you could find that formula.
BTW, it's only precisely correct when "also."

> BTW, use quaternions for special rel.,
> which shows the uniqueness of the "real, scalar, inner product" time/
> dimension of Hamilton.

That's already too confused for even a Twitter post. Don't type
anymore.

> --Light: A History!http://21stcenturysciencetech.com

How often do you get a new alias you aliASS?

Enjo(y)...
--
Mahipal

From: spudnik on
re quaternions, see C.Lanczos, _Variational Mechanics_, Dover Publ.

--Light: A History!
http://wlym.com
From: Mahipal7638 on
On Apr 15, 8:47 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> re quaternions, see C.Lanczos, _Variational Mechanics_, Dover Publ.

Fine. Quaternions are useful. I get rotations.

> --Light: A History!http://wlym.com

That link is _way_ under construction. You've made me waste one of my
lifetime's allocated number of clicks. I so hate you.

Light: A History? What, you _all_ marketeer for the same
establishment?

Enjo(y)...
--
Mahipal
From: spudnik on
quaternions *are* vector mechanics,
with inner & outer products in one operation
(terminiology all due to Hamilton;
Gibbs seperated teh two ops.,
to give what most refer to as vector mechanics).

> Fine. Quaternions are useful. I get rotations.

--Light: A History!
http://wlym.com
http://21stcenturysciencetech.com