Prev: I am groovy
Next: evidence points more to a massless neutrino than a tiny rest mass #597 Correcting Math
From: Ostap Bender on 17 Apr 2010 00:18
On Apr 13, 7:05 pm, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 14, 11:10 am, Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1...(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > These two simple mathematical equations:
>
> > #1 c(v=V) = c(v=0) + V, for wave motion where v=0 is rest speed with
> > respect to a given reference for the origin of the wave, and V is the
> > physical speed of the carrier of the wave with respect to that
> > reference;
>
> What is this 'c' function that takes a true/false value?  You've not
> explained it at all.
>
> Are you just saying v' = v+V is how to add velocities v+V ?
>
> > and
>
> > #2 E = 0.5 m*N*v*v*(N-k), where N is very large and k is small, and v
> > is the incremental speed to the body with each individual application
> > of internal force;
>
> so
>
> E = 1/2mv^2 . N(N-k)
>
> What are N and k ??

Can't you read?! He clearly defines what N is: "N is very large". And
k is very small. Can it be more clear than that?! :-)

So, this formula is true for any N and k that Arindam judges to be
"very large and small" respectively.

> That's just saying the energy is a factor multiplied by the kinetic
> energy .. which is nonsense.

What's wrong with nonsense?

> > describe natural phenomena admirably, from the Doppler effect,
> > redshift, etc. to the energy from the sun, earth, nukes, tsunamis,
> > and
> > even the lighting of a match.
>
> Not really
>
> > Equation #1 is evident from nature, and rigorously from the null
> > results of the MMI experiment.
>
> If its addition of velocities, then it is refuted experimentally
>
>
>
> > Equation #2 is based upon generalisations of Newton's first and third
> > law of motion.
>
> > Thus:
> > Every body moves in a straight line, or remains at rest, unless
> > obliged otherwise by force.
> > Note: In this revised first law, the adjective "external" that
> > qualified the word "force" is dropped.
>
> > And:
> > To every action there is an equal reaction.
> > Note: Here in the revised third law, the additional adjective
> > "opposite" qualifying the word "reaction" is dropped.
>
> > These upset the shonky theories relating to Special/General
> > Relativity, and entropy, and will revolutionise physics.
>
> No .. they are just nonsense you have written down.  They don't
> 'upset' anything
>
> > Cheers,
> > Arindam Banerjee
>
> > adda1234#bigpond.com
>
>

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: I am groovy
Next: evidence points more to a massless neutrino than a tiny rest mass #597 Correcting Math