Two slit experiment
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Apollo Mission: a Giant Leap Discrediting Greenhouse Gas Theory
Next: Misconceptions from bad use of language was Re: Two slit experiment
From: Y.Porat on 31 May 2010 03:17 On May 30, 4:27 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 30, 4:08 pm, Paul Cardinale <pcardin...(a)volcanomail.com> wrote: > > > On May 29, 8:00 am, rick_s <h...(a)my.com> wrote: > > > > So has anyone figured out the faulty logic yet wrt the two slit experiment? > > > > The fact that the screen is made of dots, never occurred to anyone that > > > is why the screen looked dot like when they were observing the fringing? > > > Are you one of the fake idiots? > > ---------------------- > Mr genius > can a single photon interfere with itself > as QM claim ?? > > TIA > Y.Porat > ------------------------- no answer !!!!........ Y.P -------------------------
From: Huang on 1 Jun 2010 08:35 > ---------------------- > Mr genius > can a single photon interfere with itself > as QM claim ?? > > TIA > Y.Porat > ------------------------- Yes, experiments have shown that a single photon will interfere with itself.
From: Huang on 1 Jun 2010 09:15 Paradox is paradoxical. It is tautological, self referential. Wrap your brains around it - that's the way it is. [1] Denying or trying to eliminate paradox from the standard model actually creates paradox and causes it to occur. [2] Embracing paradox as if it is a component of reality causes it to vanish. Until you recognize that this thing is fundamentally more slippery than what we would like, western philosophy will not be able to comprehend what is really happening in physics.
From: BURT on 1 Jun 2010 22:13 On May 29, 9:26 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 30, 1:11 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 5/29/10 10:00 AM, rick_s wrote: > > > > So has anyone figured out the faulty logic yet wrt the two slit experiment? > > > Faulty Logic? > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment > > > "In quantum mechanics, the double-slit experiment (often referred to as > > Young's experiment) demonstrates the inseparability of the wave and > > particle natures of light and other quantum particles. A coherent light > > source (e.g., a laser) illuminates a thin plate with two parallel slits > > cut in it, and the light passing through the slits strikes a screen > > behind them. The wave nature of light causes the light waves passing > > through both slits to interfere, creating an interference pattern of > > bright and dark bands on the screen. However, at the screen, the light > > is always found to be absorbed as though it were made of discrete > > particles, called photons". > > ------------------- > yest Mr parrot Wormley > you ddint tell the whole 'story'!! > the other story about itis > listen carefully > > that even a **single photon' > 'can interfere with himself "!!!! > and a single photon is defined by > your fucken QM as > E=hf > while i showed and proved that > E=hf > IS NOT THE REAL FORMULA > FOR THE REAL PHYSICAL SINGLE PHOTON!!!! > got it fucken potato head parrot ???!! > the real single photon energy is > hf times * 'Planck time'* > which gives about (quote from my own week memory) > about exp -77 Joule !! > so from now on Mr Parrot W > just remember it and tell it to your > new young readers > and tell them that there are some new innovations after 100 years of > fucken > crippled QM !! > > ATB > Y.Porat > ----------------------------- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Does light flow through two holes at the same time porat and then come back together. I think what you are saying is invalid. MItch Raemsch
From: Y.Porat on 2 Jun 2010 03:32
On Jun 2, 4:13 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 29, 9:26 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 30, 1:11 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 5/29/10 10:00 AM, rick_s wrote: > > > > > So has anyone figured out the faulty logic yet wrt the two slit experiment? > > > > Faulty Logic? > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment > > > > "In quantum mechanics, the double-slit experiment (often referred to as > > > Young's experiment) demonstrates the inseparability of the wave and > > > particle natures of light and other quantum particles. A coherent light > > > source (e.g., a laser) illuminates a thin plate with two parallel slits > > > cut in it, and the light passing through the slits strikes a screen > > > behind them. The wave nature of light causes the light waves passing > > > through both slits to interfere, creating an interference pattern of > > > bright and dark bands on the screen. However, at the screen, the light > > > is always found to be absorbed as though it were made of discrete > > > particles, called photons". > > > ------------------- > > yest Mr parrot Wormley > > you ddint tell the whole 'story'!! > > the other story about itis > > listen carefully > > > that even a **single photon' > > 'can interfere with himself "!!!! > > and a single photon is defined by > > your fucken QM as > > E=hf > > while i showed and proved that > > E=hf > > IS NOT THE REAL FORMULA > > FOR THE REAL PHYSICAL SINGLE PHOTON!!!! > > got it fucken potato head parrot ???!! > > the real single photon energy is > > hf times * 'Planck time'* > > which gives about (quote from my own week memory) > > about exp -77 Joule !! > > so from now on Mr Parrot W > > just remember it and tell it to your > > new young readers > > and tell them that there are some new innovations after 100 years of > > fucken > > crippled QM !! > > > ATB > > Y.Porat > > ----------------------------- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Does light flow through two holes at the same time porat and then come > back together. I think what you are saying is invalid. > > MItch Raemsch ------------------ i was not asking and talking about 'light' i am much more specific:!! CAN A SINGLE PHOTON INTERFERE WITH ITSELF?? (AS FUCKEN (ing) -- QM CLAIM ???) Y.Porat ------------------------- |