{UPDATE} Unlocker 1.9.0
in [Freeware]
|
From: Ron on 7 Jul 2010 11:57 On 7/7/2010 8:27 AM, D E Willson wrote: > On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:23:55 -0400, Manatee Memories > <See(a)the.REPLYTO.entry> wrote: > >> >> http://ccollomb.free.fr/unlocker/ >> >> http://www.filehippo.com/download_unlocker/ >> http://www.filehippo.com/download_unlocker/tech/ >> http://www.filehippo.com/download_unlocker/changelog/ > > Would not install unless I approved Bing search toolbar! It makes you wait about 30 seconds after deselecting Bing. (At least it did for me.) Might want to try it again. This is all kind of a pain, but I wanted to install it on a 64-bit Win7 Pro machine. hth
From: Bouba Gump on 7 Jul 2010 14:49 On Jul 6, 10:43 pm, occam <oc...(a)127.0.0.1> wrote: > On 07/07/2010 04:42, Nicetameetya wrote: > > > > > > > [Default] On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:23:55 -0400, Manatee Memories > > <S...(a)the.REPLYTO.entry> told us in complete confidence: > > >>http://ccollomb.free.fr/unlocker/ > > >>http://www.filehippo.com/download_unlocker/ > >>http://www.filehippo.com/download_unlocker/tech/ > >>http://www.filehippo.com/download_unlocker/changelog/ > > > Thanks, but I wonder why the lastest download version on the author's > > website is v1.89? > > Because Unlocker has gone to the dark side. See the entry in the > installers' Hall of Shame:http://www.calendarofupdates.com/updates/index.php?s=57277241c8b54401... > > (Beware of the wrap) "Hall of shame", come on. Give the guy a break. I just read his blog (http://ccollomb.free.fr/blog/?p=70) and he had to fork 500 bucks to support Windows 64, and he kept Unlocker free for everyone. As far as I have seen, all ads are completely optional and I did not notice any residues on my machine. What other ways would you recommend to recoup his money?
From: Bouba Gump on 7 Jul 2010 14:50 On Jul 7, 11:06 am, par4thecourse wrote: > On 07 Jul 2010, you wrote in alt.comp.freeware: > > > It makes you wait about 30 seconds after deselecting Bing. (At least it > > did for me.) Might want to try it again. This is all kind of a pain, but > > I wanted to install it on a 64-bit Win7 Pro machine. > > How about the portable version? There's no adware files in there (unless it > contacts the net to search for them. No adware in the portable versions.
From: No Spam on 7 Jul 2010 20:54 In article <aKWdnQR6D4GMX6nRnZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d(a)giganews.com> par4thecourse wrote: >On 07 Jul 2010, you wrote in alt.comp.freeware: > >> It makes you wait about 30 seconds after deselecting Bing. (At least it >> did for me.) Might want to try it again. This is all kind of a pain, but >> I wanted to install it on a 64-bit Win7 Pro machine. > >How about the portable version? There's no adware files in there (unless it >contacts the net to search for them. Does not work. Does absolutely nothing. At least on my Windows 7 Ultimate 64Bit.
From: Nicetameetya on 8 Jul 2010 02:01
[Default] On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:35:00 +1200, Nicetameetya <gday(a)invalid.invalid> told us in complete confidence: > >[Default] On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:21:55 -0700, No Spam ><nospam(a)nospam.nospam> told us in complete confidence: > >>In article <89i7tfFj12U16(a)mid.individual.net> >>Nicetameetya <gday(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> >>>[Default] On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:23:55 -0400, Manatee Memories >>><See(a)the.REPLYTO.entry> told us in complete confidence: >>> >>>> >>>>http://ccollomb.free.fr/unlocker/ >>>> >>>>http://www.filehippo.com/download_unlocker/ >>>>http://www.filehippo.com/download_unlocker/tech/ >>>>http://www.filehippo.com/download_unlocker/changelog/ >>> >>> >>>Thanks, but I wonder why the lastest download version on the author's >>>website is v1.89? >>> >> >>What site you are looking at? >> >>http://ccollomb.free.fr/unlocker/ >> >> >>Shows Unlocker 1.9.0 - 32 bit and 64 Bit versions > >I'm looking at the page opened by that link, but the "Download" button >at the top of the page leads to: > ># Download for Windows 2000 / XP / 2003 / Vista / Windows 7 - Unlocker >is Freeware > > Download Unlocker 1.8.9 Checked the page again today and it now shows v1.9.0. Strange ... |