From: Pd on 12 Apr 2010 11:30 T i m <news(a)spaced.me.uk> wrote: > On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:36:13 +0100, peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid (Pd) > wrote: > > >My experience with CPU swaps is about 30 years out of date, but my > >experience with thermal paste is more recent - the stuff gets > >everywhere. > > Not if you use a professional solution it doesn't. > > http://www.maplin.co.uk/images/full/n58gu.jpg That's just like the syringes I use. But I haven't seen the cleaning solution before - handy. "Tim Clean" - you use so much they named a cleaner after you? -- Pd
From: T i m on 12 Apr 2010 13:08 On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:30:32 +0100, peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid (Pd) wrote: >T i m <news(a)spaced.me.uk> wrote: > >> On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:36:13 +0100, peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid (Pd) >> wrote: >> >> >My experience with CPU swaps is about 30 years out of date, but my >> >experience with thermal paste is more recent - the stuff gets >> >everywhere. >> >> Not if you use a professional solution it doesn't. >> >> http://www.maplin.co.uk/images/full/n58gu.jpg > >That's just like the syringes I use. TMI. >But I haven't seen the cleaning solution before - handy. It is and it's obviously 'the' solvent for their heatsink compound as well. As you say, if you are ham fisted <g> you can get it everywhere and it sticks like the proverbial STAB but that solution dissolves it away very effectively. And (if you care about such things) I believe it's non toxic (smells citrus'y). >"Tim Clean" - you use so much they named a cleaner after you? No, I was the cleaner in the factory and they named it after me ... ;-( Cheers, T i m
From: zoara on 13 Apr 2010 05:13 Pd <peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid> wrote: > zoara <me18(a)privacy.net> wrote: > > > Also, I'm ashamed to say, it's been so long since I've swapped CPUs > > on > > anything that I'm after a bit of reassurance on compatibility. And > > on > > mucking about with thermal paste, which I've never had to do before. > > My experience with CPU swaps is about 30 years out of date, but my > experience with thermal paste is more recent - the stuff gets > everywhere. No matter how careful you think you've been, there always > seems to be a tiny bit left on your finger/spudger/chin which then > redistributes itself to your keyboard, mouse, screen, pillow, wife's > cheek, doghouse. And it's hard to get rid of, too. > Given that a quick browse on eBay implies that a 1.8Ghz CPU is about £40 whereas a box swap would probably cost me £20, I think I'll end up going the route that doesn't involve me improving the thermal conductivity of my wife. I've only got one Core Solo sale to go on, though - it went for £250ish, which seems awfully high. I'll have to keep an eye out for more to get a better idea. -z- -- email: nettid1 at fastmail dot fm
From: D.M. Procida on 13 Apr 2010 17:52 zoara <me18(a)privacy.net> wrote: > > My experience with CPU swaps is about 30 years out of date, but my > > experience with thermal paste is more recent - the stuff gets > > everywhere. No matter how careful you think you've been, there always > > seems to be a tiny bit left on your finger/spudger/chin which then > > redistributes itself to your keyboard, mouse, screen, pillow, wife's > > cheek, doghouse. And it's hard to get rid of, too. > > > > Given that a quick browse on eBay implies that a 1.8Ghz CPU is about �40 > whereas a box swap would probably cost me �20, I think I'll end up going > the route that doesn't involve me improving the thermal conductivity of > my wife. I think people who have wives should make every effort to make their thermal conductivity as good as possible. Daniele
From: Phil Taylor on 14 Apr 2010 14:20 In article <1jgwsrz.1kd3gd2lmkfspN%real-not-anti-spam-address(a)apple-juice.co.uk>, D.M. Procida <real-not-anti-spam-address(a)apple-juice.co.uk> wrote: > zoara <me18(a)privacy.net> wrote: > > > > My experience with CPU swaps is about 30 years out of date, but my > > > experience with thermal paste is more recent - the stuff gets > > > everywhere. No matter how careful you think you've been, there always > > > seems to be a tiny bit left on your finger/spudger/chin which then > > > redistributes itself to your keyboard, mouse, screen, pillow, wife's > > > cheek, doghouse. And it's hard to get rid of, too. > > > > > > > Given that a quick browse on eBay implies that a 1.8Ghz CPU is about �40 > > whereas a box swap would probably cost me �20, I think I'll end up going > > the route that doesn't involve me improving the thermal conductivity of > > my wife. > > I think people who have wives should make every effort to make their > thermal conductivity as good as possible. No - that would make the lady cold to the touch. Women are better when well-insulated. Phil Taylor
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: Ars Technica iPad review Next: Padding an image in Aperture |