From: D.M. Procida on 14 Apr 2010 15:24 Phil Taylor <nothere(a)all.invalid> wrote: > > > Given that a quick browse on eBay implies that a 1.8Ghz CPU is about �40 > > > whereas a box swap would probably cost me �20, I think I'll end up going > > > the route that doesn't involve me improving the thermal conductivity of > > > my wife. > > > > I think people who have wives should make every effort to make their > > thermal conductivity as good as possible. > > No - that would make the lady cold to the touch. Women are better when > well-insulated. Not if she's warm and generates lots of heat to begin with. Daniele
From: zoara on 14 Apr 2010 18:55
D.M. Procida <real-not-anti-spam-address(a)apple-juice.co.uk> wrote: > zoara <me18(a)privacy.net> wrote: > > > > My experience with CPU swaps is about 30 years out of date, but my > > > experience with thermal paste is more recent - the stuff gets > > > everywhere. No matter how careful you think you've been, there > > > always > > > seems to be a tiny bit left on your finger/spudger/chin which then > > > redistributes itself to your keyboard, mouse, screen, pillow, > > > wife's > > > cheek, doghouse. And it's hard to get rid of, too. > > > > > > > Given that a quick browse on eBay implies that a 1.8Ghz CPU is about > > £40 > > whereas a box swap would probably cost me £20, I think I'll end up > > going > > the route that doesn't involve me improving the thermal conductivity > > of > > my wife. > > I think people who have wives should make every effort to make their > thermal conductivity as good as possible. > Yes, but it should be deliberate, not an accidental byproduct of geekery. -z- -- email: nettid1 at fastmail dot fm |