From: Rik van Riel on 14 Dec 2009 09:50 On 12/14/2009 07:32 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > When fork bomb invoke OOM Killer, almost task might start to reclaim and > sleep on shrink_zone_begin(). if we use TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, OOM killer > can't kill such task. it mean we never recover from fork bomb. > > This patch fixes it. > > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro(a)jp.fujitsu.com> As with patch 4/8 I am not convinced that wake_up_all is the correct thing to do. Other than that: Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel(a)redhat.com> -- All rights reversed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Minchan Kim on 14 Dec 2009 19:00 On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:32:18 +0900 (JST) KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro(a)jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > When fork bomb invoke OOM Killer, almost task might start to reclaim and > sleep on shrink_zone_begin(). if we use TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, OOM killer > can't kill such task. it mean we never recover from fork bomb. > > This patch fixes it. > > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro(a)jp.fujitsu.com> I doubt wake_up_all, too. I think it's typo. Otherwise, Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim(a)gmail.com> -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Use io_schedule() instead schedule() Next: fs: fix compat_ioctl build for CONFIG_BLOCK=n |