From: Kuskokwim on 17 Sep 2009 09:45 On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:26:29 -0700, Wad Medani wrote: > Why you dissing Norton when thye give your site a 4.7/5 approval > rating? > "I would not join any club that would have someone like me for a member." - Groucho Marx
From: Ron on 17 Sep 2009 11:27 On Sep 16, 9:36 pm, Wad Medani <fu...(a)SPAMTRAP.net> wrote: > Probably posted before but just found it now so thought other noobs > here might find it handy. > > http://safeweb.norton.com/ Sign up????? I'll stick with McAfee Siteadvisor.
From: occam on 17 Sep 2009 13:53 Ron wrote: > On Sep 16, 9:36 pm, Wad Medani <fu...(a)SPAMTRAP.net> wrote: >> Probably posted before but just found it now so thought other noobs >> here might find it handy. >> >> http://safeweb.norton.com/ > > Sign up????? > > I'll stick with McAfee Siteadvisor. Hmmm, McAfee or Norton? Frying pan or the fire? WOT is an altogether better option, in my opinion. http://www.mywot.com/
From: Ron on 17 Sep 2009 18:41 On Sep 17, 5:15 pm, Wad Medani <fu...(a)SPAMTRAP.net> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:27:13 -0700 (PDT), Ron <BigELil...(a)msn.com> > wrote: > > >Sign up????? > > >I'll stick with McAfee Siteadvisor. > > No, you don't need to sign up to check sites, just need to sign up to > make comments about sites etc. Never mind...I now see that it's not the same thing as Siteadvisor.
From: JD on 17 Sep 2009 20:50
I believe "user input" speaks for itself. The only liar here is the person who says he is an MVP with no evidence to prove that. The Real Truth MVP is not listed on the MVP list: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ Go away Chris. I don't have time to play your game. This will be my only response to you. The Real Truth MVP wrote: > WOW! you are really shocked! McAfee Siteadvisor says my site is safe > too, that's because IT IS! and they both actually scan my site and it's > contents. But then mywot only relies on user input and we all know > people like you lie all the time. > > -- JD.. |