From: Tom Mc on 2 Mar 2010 13:08 We use Risk+ as a risk simulation tool. We have discovered that it works approximately 20 times SLOWER in MSP 2007 than MSP 2003. Has anyone else run into this problem. If so, is there a remedy?
From: Rob Schneider on 2 Mar 2010 13:31 My hunch this not a generic issue, but surely best that you consult with the Risk+ people on this. --rms www.rmschneider.com On 02/03/10 18:08, Tom Mc wrote: > We use Risk+ as a risk simulation tool. We have discovered that it works > approximately 20 times SLOWER in MSP 2007 than MSP 2003. Has anyone else run > into this problem. If so, is there a remedy?
From: Jim Aksel on 2 Mar 2010 18:57 We use Risk+ quite frequently in P2003, P2007 and P2010. There is no appreciable difference in performance between the patforms. Might you have files accessed externally from a shared server? We did find network latency to be a problem on Master Projects stored out on the servers. -- If this post was helpful, please consider rating it. Jim Aksel, MVP Check out my blog for more information: http://www.msprojectblog.com "Tom Mc" wrote: > We use Risk+ as a risk simulation tool. We have discovered that it works > approximately 20 times SLOWER in MSP 2007 than MSP 2003. Has anyone else run > into this problem. If so, is there a remedy?
From: Tom Mc on 4 Mar 2010 13:37 I have tried on several instances with seveal machines and several files a consistent and significant performance problem with P2007. For example, I have a small file with only 153 tasks and it takes 20 minutes to run 1000 samples. I have found that other people have had similar performance problems with P2007. I run the simulation on a file stored on my desktop (local), so network latency is not an issue. Any other thoughts? Thanks - Tom "Jim Aksel" wrote: > We use Risk+ quite frequently in P2003, P2007 and P2010. There is no > appreciable difference in performance between the patforms. > > Might you have files accessed externally from a shared server? We did find > network latency to be a problem on Master Projects stored out on the servers. > -- > If this post was helpful, please consider rating it. > > Jim Aksel, MVP > > Check out my blog for more information: > http://www.msprojectblog.com > > > > "Tom Mc" wrote: > > > We use Risk+ as a risk simulation tool. We have discovered that it works > > approximately 20 times SLOWER in MSP 2007 than MSP 2003. Has anyone else run > > into this problem. If so, is there a remedy?
From: Rob Schneider on 5 Mar 2010 02:59 I'd be curious to hear what the Risk+ people say on this? --rms www.rmschneider.com On 04/03/10 18:37, Tom Mc wrote: > I have tried on several instances with seveal machines and several files a > consistent and significant performance problem with P2007. For example, I > have a small file with only 153 tasks and it takes 20 minutes to run 1000 > samples. I have found that other people have had similar performance > problems with P2007. > > I run the simulation on a file stored on my desktop (local), so network > latency is not an issue. > > Any other thoughts? Thanks - Tom > > "Jim Aksel" wrote: > >> We use Risk+ quite frequently in P2003, P2007 and P2010. There is no >> appreciable difference in performance between the patforms. >> >> Might you have files accessed externally from a shared server? We did find >> network latency to be a problem on Master Projects stored out on the servers. >> -- >> If this post was helpful, please consider rating it. >> >> Jim Aksel, MVP >> >> Check out my blog for more information: >> http://www.msprojectblog.com >> >> >> >> "Tom Mc" wrote: >> >>> We use Risk+ as a risk simulation tool. We have discovered that it works >>> approximately 20 times SLOWER in MSP 2007 than MSP 2003. Has anyone else run >>> into this problem. If so, is there a remedy?
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Windows 7, MS Project, or Sharepoint which to get first Next: Project for mac |