From: luudee on 26 Oct 2009 10:59 Howdy All, Has anybody got the "Receiver Detect" feature to work in Virtex 5 VFX (with GTX transceivers) ? I have read "RocketIO GTX Transceiver User Guide" (UG198) from beginning to end, and am following the procedure described exactly as stated. I Am always getting "Receiver Not Present" status, even though external equipment (Protocol Analyser and Protocol Generator) properly report Receiver present or not present, depending on the setup. Any suggestion, and pointers appreciated. Cheers, rudi
From: austin on 26 Oct 2009 17:23 Rudi, Have you read http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/user_guides/ug198.pdf page 151, where they refer to the PIPE documents which details this functionality? On page 21 of the gen2 document from Intel, and the next pages. http://download.intel.com/technology/pciexpress/devnet/docs/pipe2_00.pdf The test equipment reporting a receiver present does a lot of work (based on my reading of the Intel document), and there would be many ways that in the FPGA you might not be performing the required sequence per the standard. Austin
From: luudee on 26 Oct 2009 22:55 On Oct 27, 4:23 am, austin <aus...(a)xilinx.com> wrote: > Rudi, > > Have you read > > http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/user_guides/ug198.pdf > > page 151, where they refer to the PIPE documents which details this > functionality? > > On page 21 of the gen2 document from Intel, and the next pages. > > http://download.intel.com/technology/pciexpress/devnet/docs/pipe2_00.pdf > > The test equipment reporting a receiver present does a lot of work > (based on my reading of the Intel document), and there would be many > ways that in the FPGA you might not be performing the required > sequence per the standard. > > Austin Hi Austin, thank you for you reply. I did read ug198 and pipe 2.0 specs. That's what makes it so frustrating ! I feel that I follow both specifications to the letter, and it still does not work. Could there be an undocumented step ? Some assumption that is not obvious ? Thank you ! rudi
From: austin on 27 Oct 2009 10:47 Rudi, I do not know. That is the purpose of documentation, to document. One thought I had is that this works by measuring the difference between an open line, and a terminated line, at the transmitter. Such analog measurement techniques only work for an exact fixed length of the PCIe bus connection. If you are using extension cables, or an extension card, the length of the transmission lines may affect the measurement. Austin
From: luudee on 27 Oct 2009 11:17 On Oct 27, 9:47 pm, austin <aus...(a)xilinx.com> wrote: > Rudi, > > I do not know. That is the purpose of documentation, to document. > > One thought I had is that this works by measuring the difference > between an open line, and a terminated line, at the transmitter. Such > analog measurement techniques only work for an exact fixed length of > the PCIe bus connection. If you are using extension cables, or an > extension card, the length of the transmission lines may affect the > measurement. > > Austin Hi Austin, I feel that in this case the documentation fails to document. The description for Receiver Detect is a) incomplete; and, b) scattered throughout unrelated sections. My understanding is that this logic works by measuring the time it takes to charge the coupling capacitor. (It is present and correct value on my board). Cable length should not matter. Receiver Detection is described starting on page 151 in ug198. It clearly shows a waveform diagram, where I enter powermode 2'b10, and the next cycle assert TXDETECTRX. And some time later, I will get PHYSTATUS, that validates the value on RXSTATUS lines. But than, in table 5-14 (page 111) I find out that TXELECIDLE also must be asserted to initiate Receiver Detection. And again, in other parts of the document, I find that when changing powermode, I need to wait for PHYSTATUS to indicate that power mode has been changed (change completed). I have tried the original description as on page 151, as well, as adding the other bits I found out. And still, I consistently get "No Receiver Detected". The other side has no problem detecting my hardware. Is there somebody who knows this stuff inside out and can shed some light on how to make this work ? Thanks, rudi
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: The Top of a free 40 Java Video online Tutorials Next: save data from adc in text file |