From: FatBytestard on 18 Jun 2010 11:17 On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:32:36 -0700 (PDT), Benj <bjacoby(a)iwaynet.net> wrote: >On Jun 18, 5:48�am, "Skybuck Flying" <IntoTheFut...(a)hotmail.com> >wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Would it be possible to "vaporize" any dust particles during the chip >> manufacturing ? >> >> From what I understand "dust" particles cause lot's of chip-duds. >> >> Since E=MC^2 maybe the "matter of the dust particle" can be turned into >> energy clearing it ? >> >> Bye, >> � Skybuck. > >Lessee. Obviously you are an "idea man" rather than someone who works >out the mundane details! I don't know. maybe a giant laser or nuclear >reactor or perhaps an LHC would be the way to go to "smash" dust >particles in chip manufacture rather than the usual fans and filters. >I mean how much more could it cost? Jeez, you are even more stupid than he is!
From: Archimedes' Lever on 18 Jun 2010 11:25 On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:57:02 -0400, EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling(a)thevillage.com> wrote: >dlzc wrote: >> >> A megaton nuclear weapon "converts" a few nanograms of mass to >> energy (the rest is there just for chance). > >1 megaton TNT = 4.184e15 joules >E=MC^2 = 9.0e16 J/Kg > >1 megaton = 46.49 grams. > >Eric Grams? Grams of WHAT? I am sure that 46.49 grams of water would yield less than 46.49 grams of highly enriched Uranium. Also, a nuke does not "convert a few nanograms". For one thing, it does not get "converted", it gets "released". The first ones REQUIRED 100lbs of material to go critical. Modern devices "need" less, but the designs are hardly set up where they include more than they need. To claim so is just stupid. Also, ALL of it goes fissile, so the "just there for chance" remark is stupid as well. Your brain must only weigh a few nanograms. There cannot be any more than that after stupid statements like the one you made here.
From: John Larkin on 18 Jun 2010 11:33 On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:48:11 +0200, "Skybuck Flying" <IntoTheFuture(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >Hello, > >Would it be possible to "vaporize" any dust particles during the chip >manufacturing ? > >From what I understand "dust" particles cause lot's of chip-duds. > >Since E=MC^2 maybe the "matter of the dust particle" can be turned into >energy clearing it ? > >Bye, > Skybuck. > Simply blast each dust particle on the wafer surface with a same-sized chunk of antimatter. I generously donate this invention to the public domain. John
From: Archimedes' Lever on 18 Jun 2010 11:45 On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:33:00 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:48:11 +0200, "Skybuck Flying" ><IntoTheFuture(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>Hello, >> >>Would it be possible to "vaporize" any dust particles during the chip >>manufacturing ? >> >>From what I understand "dust" particles cause lot's of chip-duds. >> >>Since E=MC^2 maybe the "matter of the dust particle" can be turned into >>energy clearing it ? >> >>Bye, >> Skybuck. >> > >Simply blast each dust particle on the wafer surface with a same-sized >chunk of antimatter. > >I generously donate this invention to the public domain. > >John > Perhaps you could dive into a pool of antimatter and get 'blasted away'. I generously donate this Earth soothing suggestion to you. That way, you might be able to recover a tiny bit of honor.
From: Martin Brown on 18 Jun 2010 12:01
On 18/06/2010 16:25, Archimedes' Lever wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:57:02 -0400, EricP > <ThatWouldBeTelling(a)thevillage.com> wrote: > >> dlzc wrote: >>> >>> A megaton nuclear weapon "converts" a few nanograms of mass to >>> energy (the rest is there just for chance). >> >> 1 megaton TNT = 4.184e15 joules >> E=MC^2 = 9.0e16 J/Kg >> >> 1 megaton = 46.49 grams. >> >> Eric > > Grams? Grams of WHAT? Grams of matter converted into energy according to E = mc^2 EricP is right on the money. Nuclear binding energy is released by fission and the bits remaining afterwards weigh a little bit less. The mass difference becomes kinetic energy and electromagetic radiation. A nanogram of mass annihilated would release about 90kJ - barely enough to boil the water needed to make a small pot of tea. Regards, Martin Brown |