Prev: Can thermodynamical model be fundamental: reason not result?
Next: La Théorie d'Unification de Mécanique Quantique et de Relativité Générale
From: Sam Wormley on 13 Jul 2010 23:16
On 7/13/10 3:38 AM, Michael Helland wrote:
> Give me 4 questions and we'll see if I can answer them.

What is the time dilation compared to a stationary ground clock
of a satellite clock in orbit with an eccentricity of 0 and an
altitude of 202 km above mean sea level?


From: nuny on 14 Jul 2010 07:18
On Jul 13, 1:38 am, Michael Helland <mobyd...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 13, 12:36 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Michael Helland wrote:
> > > On Jul 12, 12:31 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Michael Helland wrote:
> > >> > On Jul 12, 10:21 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >> Michael Helland wrote:
>
> > >> >> [snip all, unread]
>
> > >> >> Learn to write a technical paper, jackass.
>
> > >> > If you're not going to read it, why would I bother?
>
> > >> Mike, as has been well established already:
>
> > >> YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.
>
> > > Did you watch the video?
>
> > I don't need to watch a video of you talking about something you don't
> > understand to know you don't understand. I've only been watching you talk
> > for the last 5 goddamn years.
>
> There is no talking. Just time-sequenced results from a mathematical
> model and a graph summarizing the results.
>
> > > Did you see the graph at the end of the video?
>
> > > That's what I'm talking about. And I don't think its all that
> > > complicated.
>
> > When can we expect you to learn undergraduate electromagnetic theory? 2015?
>
> Give me 4 questions and we'll see if I can answer them.

Where is the discontinuity between a half-wave dipole antenna's near
and far fields located? Assume the antenna is immersed in vacuum, far
from any other conductors, and zero element thickness.

How large is the discontinuity?

What differentiates it from the near and far field regions?

Why do the measured strengths of the E and H components of the far
field obey the inverse-square law but those of the near field do not?


Mark L. Fergerson
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Can thermodynamical model be fundamental: reason not result?
Next: La Théorie d'Unification de Mécanique Quantique et de Relativité Générale