From: James Sweet on

"Shawn D'Alimonte" <shawnd(a)mycybernet.net> wrote in message
news:qPHci.50564$dC2.7793(a)newsfe13.lga...
> JW wrote:
>> I am looking for some vintage AC power cords for older HP test equipment.
>> I have a number of pieces of test equipment, and only one power cord. The
>> only marking on it is "Electricord". It is a three conductor cord that
>> uses three round female sockets on the end that terminates at the
>> equipment
>
> This probably isn't up to code, but for my function generator I cut the
> end off another cord and crimped yellow (12ga?) but splices to it.
> Slightly crimping the other end made a socket that nicely fits the pins.
>
> Looks ugly, but works.

I've done something similar but filled in the space with hot glue to mold a
connector. If you wax or otherwise lubricate the socket, the hot glue won't
stick to it and you can use the socket itself to mold the shape of the plug.

A better option may be to retrofit the equipment with standard IEC power
sockets which can be salvaged from junk computer equipment.


From: Mark Zenier on
In article <e1p4735r8j48l8gibsnl1039inmed71ch8(a)4ax.com>,
JW <none(a)dev.nul> wrote:
>I am looking for some vintage AC power cords for older HP test equipment.
>I have a number of pieces of test equipment, and only one power cord. The
>only marking on it is "Electricord". It is a three conductor cord that
>uses three round female sockets on the end that terminates at the
>equipment, and is similar to the old power cords that were found on coffee
>pots and such (but with one more pin in the center offset from the other
>two - a ground, I suppose). I believe it is typical of HP equipment made
>in the 1960's to have these, such as the HP745A AC calibrator, among
>others. Does anyone know where I might find some of these, or perhaps know
>what the original HP part # is? (I know that I could hard-wire a standard
>line cord to these units, but would much rather have the proper cords.)

There was a discussion here (sci.electronics.equipment) several years ago
that included the Belden part numbers.

Looks like I saved it. Here's the highpoints (minus the flamewar).


>From: Jim Adney <jadney(a)vwtype3.org>
>Newsgroups: sci.electronics.equipment,misc.industry.electronics.marketplace,rec.radio.swap
>Subject: Re: "Old" HP Power cords = Belden 17280
>Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 23:07:29 -0600
>Message-ID: <6oq8atgo45s5h6kian42a6ngpa7uf6ot8r(a)4ax.com>
>References: <3A96A4D4.599A3B44(a)arrl.net>

>"L. Mark PIlant" <n1vqw(a)arrl.net> wrote:

>>I've been seeing a fair number of these power cords being offered
>>as being *rare*. They ARE NOT rare.
>>
>>These are still being made. They are listed in the current Newark
>>Electronics and Allied Electronics catalogs. If you look for a
>>Belden 17280 cord you will find them. They are about USD $5.00 new!
>>BTW, They may actually be under the Volex name, since Belden sold
>>the manufacturing to them a bit back.

>I seem to recall going thru this 15-20 years ago. At that time I
>checked the Belden catalog and discovered that there were TWO
>DIFFERENT types of these. They differed in the way that the oval end
>was wired.

>The standard way has the ground on the center pin, but the old HP (and
>Harrison Labs) equipment used a non-standard configuration that put
>the ground on one side.

>This left me with a quandry. Should I buy standard ones and rewire the
>HP gear to be standard with the thought that it was less likely that
>someone might come up with the correct, but uncommon, cord and make
>the chassis live. Or should I buy the right cord and take a chance
>that that cord might migrate to a more conventional piece of
>equipement and make IT live?

>In the end, I bought the conventional versions and rewired the 3
>pieces of HP gear that we had.

>That was easy, but in retrospect installing the newer style of power
>entry module would have been better, as there would have been no
>possible confusion thereafter.

>So, does Belden still make both styles, or is someone here just
>assuming that since the oval connector looks right it must BE right?

>-
>-----------------------------------------------
> Jim Adney jadney(a)vwtype3.org
> Madison,Wisconsin USA
>-----------------------------------------------


>From: "L. Mark Pilant" <n1vqw(a)arrl.net>
>Newsgroups: sci.electronics.equipment,misc.industry.electronics.marketplace,rec.radio.swap
>Subject: Re: "Old" HP Power cords = Belden 17280
>Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 09:31:38 -0500
>Message-ID: <3AA6464A.9F35642A(a)arrl.net>
>References: <3A96A4D4.599A3B44(a)arrl.net> <6oq8atgo45s5h6kian42a6ngpa7uf6ot8r(a)4ax.com>

>Jim, Belden/Volex still makes both versions. The 17280 is the
>standard version and the 17952 is the one with the swapped line
>and neutral. Oh yes, the 17280 is 7.5 feet long, and the 17952
>is 8 feet long. I wonder if the length is different to allow you
>to tell which cord you have without having to test it.

>- Mark

>From: "L. Mark Pilant" <n1vqw(a)arrl.net>
>Newsgroups: sci.electronics.equipment,misc.industry.electronics.marketplace,rec.radio.swap
>Subject: Re: "Old" HP Power cords = Belden 17280
>Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 13:37:54 -0500
>Message-ID: <3AA7D182.E1EA6965(a)arrl.net>
>References: <3A96A4D4.599A3B44(a)arrl.net> <6oq8atgo45s5h6kian42a6ngpa7uf6ot8r(a)4ax.com> <3AA6464A.9F35642A(a)arrl.net> <q8vdatcup2t189n61imv060fk596rihh15(a)4ax.com>

>> Thanks. At least it was the ground and neutral that were switched, but
>> even that could be lethal if swapped. A really bad situation.

>Jim, it isn't the ground and neutral which were swapped, but line
>(a.k.a., hot) and neutral. (I think this is what you meant. :-)

>(You probably already know this Jim, but for those that don't...)

>While this may not look like a real big problem because the line
>and neutral simply go through a fuse and switch to the transformer,
>there is a subtle issue which is potentially lethal.

>In this case, the line and neutral are completely isolated from
>the grounded case. Where the problem arises is the switch and
>fuse are now in the neutral rather than hot line. This means
>even after pulling the fuse, much more of the circuitry remains
>"live." This is only slightly better if the power switch is used
>to break both the hot and neutral.

>From the Volex site (http://www.volexpowercords.com/) for the
>17280 cord: 'Polarity as mandated by CSA electical (SIC) Bulletin
>895B and UL817.' And for the 17952 cord: 'This cord is made with
>non-standard polarization and has a cautin (SIC) label applied
>to the cord stating this fact: "This cord is for replacement
>only and is NOT intended for new original equipment."'

>- Mark





Mark Zenier mzenier(a)eskimo.com
Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com)

From: Jamie on
Mark Zenier wrote:

> In article <e1p4735r8j48l8gibsnl1039inmed71ch8(a)4ax.com>,
> JW <none(a)dev.nul> wrote:
>
>>I am looking for some vintage AC power cords for older HP test equipment.
>>I have a number of pieces of test equipment, and only one power cord. The
>>only marking on it is "Electricord". It is a three conductor cord that
>>uses three round female sockets on the end that terminates at the
>>equipment, and is similar to the old power cords that were found on coffee
>>pots and such (but with one more pin in the center offset from the other
>>two - a ground, I suppose). I believe it is typical of HP equipment made
>>in the 1960's to have these, such as the HP745A AC calibrator, among
>>others. Does anyone know where I might find some of these, or perhaps know
>>what the original HP part # is? (I know that I could hard-wire a standard
>>line cord to these units, but would much rather have the proper cords.)
>
>
> There was a discussion here (sci.electronics.equipment) several years ago
> that included the Belden part numbers.
>
> Looks like I saved it. Here's the highpoints (minus the flamewar).
>
>
>
if you can remember that much here in such detail? It shows signs of
CPU addiction.

Me, I can't afford to use any brain matter wastefully! :)



"I'm never wrong, once i thought i was, but was mistaken"
Real Programmers Do things like this.
http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5

From: Mark Zenier on
In article <%70di.169$Cg7.125(a)newsfe05.lga>,
Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_(a)charter.net> wrote:
>Mark Zenier wrote:
>>
>> Looks like I saved it. Here's the highpoints (minus the flamewar).
>>
> if you can remember that much here in such detail? It shows signs of
>CPU addiction.
>
> Me, I can't afford to use any brain matter wastefully! :)

Well, all it takes is an archive of the newsgroup* since it got
created and a vague memory of something. And then you "grep for it".
It takes a while though, (Google can be faster).

*(Proprietary interest, I got the damn thing created in the first place).

Mark Zenier mzenier(a)eskimo.com
Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com)