From: JayPee Vee on
On 1 Jun., 08:24, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 31, 9:40 pm, Dakota <ma...(a)NOSPAM.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Monday 5/31/10 11:34 PM, BURT wrote:
>
> > > On May 31, 9:28 pm, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com>  wrote:
> > >> On May 31, 11:21 pm, Olrik<olrik...(a)yahoo.com>  wrote:
>
> > >>> Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a écrit :
>
> > >>>> Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as
> > >>>> genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his
> > >>>> imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started
> > >>>> without God.
>
> > >>> Define that "god" thing you're talking about.
>
> > >> God and the Universe are identical concepts.
>
> > > There is no universe without God.
>
> > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > Dr. Hawking's imagination is a more reliable source of truth than all of
> > the world's holy books.
>
> > What has god done for you lately?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> He doesn't need to do anything for me.
> What does he need to do for you?
> Hawking is a looser.

What's a "looser"?

From: BURT on
On May 31, 10:27 pm, JayPee Vee <jaypee1...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1 Jun., 08:24, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 31, 9:40 pm, Dakota <ma...(a)NOSPAM.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Monday 5/31/10 11:34 PM, BURT wrote:
>
> > > > On May 31, 9:28 pm, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com>  wrote:
> > > >> On May 31, 11:21 pm, Olrik<olrik...(a)yahoo.com>  wrote:
>
> > > >>> Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a écrit :
>
> > > >>>> Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as
> > > >>>> genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his
> > > >>>> imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started
> > > >>>> without God.
>
> > > >>> Define that "god" thing you're talking about.
>
> > > >> God and the Universe are identical concepts.
>
> > > > There is no universe without God.
>
> > > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > > Dr. Hawking's imagination is a more reliable source of truth than all of
> > > the world's holy books.
>
> > > What has god done for you lately?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > He doesn't need to do anything for me.
> > What does he need to do for you?
> > Hawking is a looser.
>
> What's a "looser"?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Your a big one.
Show me where I am wrong.

From: Syd M. on
On Jun 1, 12:34 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 31, 9:28 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 31, 11:21 pm, Olrik <olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a écrit :
>
> > > > Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as
> > > > genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his
> > > > imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started
> > > > without God.
>
> > > Define that "god" thing you're talking about.
>
> > God and the Universe are identical concepts.
>
> There is no universe without God.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

Unsupported assertion.

PDW
From: Dakota on
On Tuesday 6/1/10 12:31 AM, BURT wrote:
> On May 31, 10:27 pm, JayPee Vee<jaypee1...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 1 Jun., 08:24, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 31, 9:40 pm, Dakota<ma...(a)NOSPAM.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> On Monday 5/31/10 11:34 PM, BURT wrote:
>>
>>>>> On May 31, 9:28 pm, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On May 31, 11:21 pm, Olrik<olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a �crit :
>>
>>>>>>>> Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as
>>>>>>>> genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his
>>>>>>>> imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started
>>>>>>>> without God.
>>
>>>>>>> Define that "god" thing you're talking about.
>>
>>>>>> God and the Universe are identical concepts.
>>
>>>>> There is no universe without God.
>>
>>>>> Mitch Raemsch
>>
>>>> Dr. Hawking's imagination is a more reliable source of truth than all of
>>>> the world's holy books.
>>
>>>> What has god done for you lately?- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>>> He doesn't need to do anything for me.
>>> What does he need to do for you?
>>> Hawking is a looser.
>>
>> What's a "looser"?- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Your a big one.
> Show me where I am wrong.
>
I don't want to take the time to show you everywhere that you are wrong
but I will point out that there is a difference between the words
'loose' and 'lose.'

Something that is less taut is 'looser.'

Someone who doesn't win is a 'loser.' You are a good example of a loser.
From: Yap on
On 1 Jun, 11:34, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 31, 9:28 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 31, 11:21 pm, Olrik <olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a écrit :
>
> > > > Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as
> > > > genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his
> > > > imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started
> > > > without God.
>
> > > Define that "god" thing you're talking about.
>
> > God and the Universe are identical concepts.
>
> There is no universe without God.
There is no god, but there is a universe.
So mighty is your sky pixie that it could not even plug the oil leak,
right?
>
> Mitch Raemsch