WE don't need God. All we need is nutty physics that we can call genius
in [Physics]
|
Prev: CEI Sues NASA to Disclose Global-warming Info
Next: Biggest Lie Yet Of the Spill: BP "Couldn'tDetermine?the?Flow??Rate"
From: BURT on 4 Jun 2010 16:48 On Jun 4, 12:03 am, Richo <m.richardso...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 1, 2:28 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On May 31, 11:21 pm, Olrik <olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a écrit : > > > > > Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as > > > > genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his > > > > imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started > > > > without God. > > > > Define that "god" thing you're talking about. > > > God and the Universe are identical concepts. > > Not to me they arent. > You dont need to believe in the universe or pray to it or worship it > - for example. > > Mark. Einstein said we could stand rapt in awe contemplating the universe and that if we can't do that we are as good as dead. Mitch Raemsch
From: Smiler. on 4 Jun 2010 18:52 BURT wrote: > On Jun 4, 12:03 am, Richo <m.richardso...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On Jun 1, 2:28 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On May 31, 11:21 pm, Olrik <olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>>> Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a �crit : >> >>>>> Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as >>>>> genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his >>>>> imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started >>>>> without God. >> >>>> Define that "god" thing you're talking about. >> >>> God and the Universe are identical concepts. >> >> Not to me they arent. >> You dont need to believe in the universe or pray to it or worship it >> - for example. >> >> Mark. > > Einstein said we could stand rapt in awe contemplating the universe > and that if we can't do that we are as good as dead. > The universe provably exists, your god is both unprovable and doesn't exist. -- Smiler The godless one. a.a.# 2279 All gods are bespoke. They're all made to perfectly fit the prejudices of their believers.
From: BURT on 4 Jun 2010 19:49 On Jun 4, 3:52 pm, "Smiler." <Smi...(a)Jo.king.com> wrote: > BURT wrote: > > On Jun 4, 12:03 am, Richo <m.richardso...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Jun 1, 2:28 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>> On May 31, 11:21 pm, Olrik <olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>>> Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a crit : > > >>>>> Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as > >>>>> genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his > >>>>> imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started > >>>>> without God. > > >>>> Define that "god" thing you're talking about. > > >>> God and the Universe are identical concepts. > > >> Not to me they arent. > >> You dont need to believe in the universe or pray to it or worship it > >> - for example. > > >> Mark. > > > Einstein said we could stand rapt in awe contemplating the universe > > and that if we can't do that we are as good as dead. > > The universe provably exists, your god is both unprovable and doesn't exist. > > -- > Smiler > The godless one. > a.a.# 2279 > All gods are bespoke. They're all made to perfectly > fit the prejudices of their believers.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Prove that. My God doesn't need to prove that He exists. Mitch Raemsch
From: Richo on 5 Jun 2010 07:16 On Jun 5, 6:48 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 4, 12:03 am, Richo <m.richardso...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 2:28 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 31, 11:21 pm, Olrik <olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a écrit : > > > > > > Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as > > > > > genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his > > > > > imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started > > > > > without God. > > > > > Define that "god" thing you're talking about. > > > > God and the Universe are identical concepts. > > > Not to me they arent. > > You dont need to believe in the universe or pray to it or worship it > > - for example. > > > Mark. > > Einstein said we could stand rapt in awe contemplating the universe > and that if we can't do that we are as good as dead. > Fair enough. Mark
From: BURT on 6 Jun 2010 16:37
On Jun 5, 12:44 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr...(a)prismnet.com> wrote: > ["Followup-To:" header set to alt.atheism.] > > > > > > On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 11:19:36 -0700 (PDT), RedDog <reddog1...(a)budweiser.com> wrote: > > On Jun 1, 3:55?am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as > >> genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his > >> imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started > >> without God. He has gotten away with it. He is the biggest looser and > >> the world put him on the top of science. Shows you that all of them > >> are good for nothing. The world needs an inferior genius to emulate. > > >> Mitch Raemsch > > > What is a "looser"? Can't answer that one? Okay then, here's another > > one: > > > What is a "loser"? Answer: Someone who, although they're too damn dumb > > to know how to spell "loser", calls Stephen Hawking an "inferior > > genius". > > > HTH. :-) > > Or, one who's looser with the conventional spelling. At least it wasn't > abominable (the word that won me the school spelling bee, back in 1964). > > -- > Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patr...(a)io.com) Houston, Texas > www.prismnet.com/~patrick/aeros.php(TCI's 2009-10 Houston Aeros) AA#2273 > LAST GAME: San Antonio 3, Houston 2 (April 11) > NEXT GAME: The 2010-11 opener, in October 2010- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - It is easy to point out his inferior genius. He believes that to deal with the future we have to put people on the moon in order for our survival. Then throughout the solar system. It is known that right now our resources are close to an end to do such a thing. Of what would it benifit the earth to use all of its resource on something as dumb as putting a few people in space. I mean it will not help in any way and that is obvious to anyone objective about it. Stephen Hawking is a dumb genius. He believes that when we make contact they will be doing it to colonize us. This again is total imbecility. Mitch Raemsch |