From: David Brown on 12 Aug 2010 06:25 On 12/08/2010 11:14, mjt wrote: > On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 10:01:34 +0200 > David Brown<david(a)westcontrol.removethisbit.com> wrote: > [snipped] >> But don't worry about trying to say "GNU/Linux". There are some >> people who are keen on the term because they feel the work of FSF and >> GNU is under-appreciated - they have a fair point, but the term is >> too cumbersome and hasn't really caught on. > > That was my attempt to show the different layers, > a sort of "long explanation" of your "Ford and cars" > response (nice analogy, BTW). I do understand folks > say "Linux" in a generic way, but "Ubuntu and Linux" > was such a crass statement, I had to jump in :) > > And I do understand 98% of folks won't write "GNU/Linux", > I felt it important to show the distinctions. > Fair enough. I was trying to explain the situation a little more to the O/P, since he seems unfamiliar with the terms and how Linux systems fit together. I wasn't trying to correct you - just to expand on your post. >> It's also unfair to >> those who wrote everything else that goes into a typical Linux >> system. While it's true that a bare Linux kernel is little use >> without all the GNU programs around it, the most visible programs in >> a typical Linux system are neither Linux nor GNU. Linux + GNU >> programs are little real-world use without X, Window managers, server >> software (web, database, etc.), application programs, etc. > > I certainly wasn't trying to exclude all the fine folks who've > brought "everything else" to make a Linux system more usable. > > GNU/Linux can be a usable system. I think most would agree > that "Linux + GNU + X, Window managers, server software > (web, database, etc.), application programs, etc." is the > "distribution" (distro) layer. > GNU + Linux is certainly usable for some things - once you've got virtual consoles, emacs, and gcc, what more do you need? But for most uses, you either have a server system or you have a gui, and thus that is what most people refer to as being part of their Linux system.
From: Kenny McCormack on 12 Aug 2010 12:35 In article <4c63aa8b$0$14523$8404b019(a)news.wineasy.se>, David Brown <david(a)westcontrol.removethisbit.com> wrote: .... >neither Linux nor GNU. Linux + GNU programs are little real-world use >without X, Window managers, server software (web, database, etc.), >application programs, etc. Of course, now you're going to hear from all the people who, like me, use Linux daily but don't use any of: X, Window managers, server software (web, database, etc.), Well, OK, I guess I do use "etc", since that could mean anything... -- "We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides." - Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order -
From: David Brown on 13 Aug 2010 03:52 On 12/08/2010 18:35, Kenny McCormack wrote: > In article<4c63aa8b$0$14523$8404b019(a)news.wineasy.se>, > David Brown<david(a)westcontrol.removethisbit.com> wrote: > ... >> neither Linux nor GNU. Linux + GNU programs are little real-world use >> without X, Window managers, server software (web, database, etc.), >> application programs, etc. > > Of course, now you're going to hear from all the people who, like me, > use Linux daily but don't use any of: > > X, Window managers, server software (web, database, etc.), > > Well, OK, I guess I do use "etc", since that could mean anything... > When you've got emacs, who needs anything else :-) Actually, I know there is plenty of use for such systems - I use several myself (mostly virtual machines floating around somewhere). My main use is as build servers - systems with particular versions of gcc cross-compilers which I access with ssh. It is convenient to keep these as completely separate machines, and X or other servers would just be a waste of resources.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: alternate data stream Next: ps lists user as uid instead of username |