Was Einstein Guilty of Scientific Fraud?
in [Relativity]
|
From: Inertial on 30 Mar 2010 20:11 "Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message news:rut4r557lr2mdpg955hlpjlh97m5js49at(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:56:39 +1100, "Inertial" <relatively(a)rest.com> > wrote: > >> >>"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message >>news:3h32r51havo2auhjqfb3h2f06najt4mf63(a)4ax.com... >>> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:43:07 +1100, "Inertial" <relatively(a)rest.com> > >>>>> I understand that Einstein's mathematical approach is valid, though >>>>> somewhat hyperbolized in a few areas, but fundamentally flawed in >>>>> premise >>>>> as to why nature behaves as it does. >>>>> >>>>> I doubt that he intentionally perpetrated a hoax, though the results >>>>> of >>>>> his efforts prove to be as bad as a hoax, and a very big, serious one, >>>>> setting science back 75 years. >>>> >>>>Hardly .. it advanced greatly due to his work and the other physicists >>>>of >>>>his time. >>> >>> What about all those floundering astronomers who try to formulate >>> ridiculous >>> theories based on the fairytale that all starlight travels towards >>> little >>> planet Earth at precisely c? >> >>Why would you expect it to travel any differently toward earth than any >>other planet? > > Because light moves at c wrt its source. And everything else.
From: rotchm on 30 Mar 2010 23:11 > > I will be looking forward to seeing "Inertial" explain what > > "can be measured between two events <other than> an interaction time. > > Distance > > Thanks for playing.- I too want to play... Distance is an interaction time between two events. Distance is defined by the measurement of time: http://www.bipm.org/jsp/en/ListCGPMResolution.jsp?CGPM=17
From: Inertial on 30 Mar 2010 23:15 "rotchm" <rotchm(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:9a446ccc-57b2-4875-88c7-7d87b3d20538(a)d33g2000vbu.googlegroups.com... > >> > I will be looking forward to seeing "Inertial" explain what >> > "can be measured between two events <other than> an interaction time. >> >> Distance >> >> Thanks for playing.- > > > I too want to play... > > Distance is an interaction time between two events. Distance is > defined by the measurement of time: > > http://www.bipm.org/jsp/en/ListCGPMResolution.jsp?CGPM=17 Distance is not an 'interaction time'. Event 'interaction' is also only one-way .. so is not really 'inter' action.
From: Androcles on 31 Mar 2010 00:48 "rotchm" <rotchm(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:9a446ccc-57b2-4875-88c7-7d87b3d20538(a)d33g2000vbu.googlegroups.com... > >> > I will be looking forward to seeing "Inertial" explain what >> > "can be measured between two events <other than> an interaction time. >> >> Distance >> >> Thanks for playing.- > > > I too want to play... > > Distance is an interaction time Bwahahahahahahaha! If you want to play, learn the fuckin' rules!
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 31 Mar 2010 02:06
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:11:51 +1100, "Inertial" <relatively(a)rest.com> wrote: > >"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message >news:rut4r557lr2mdpg955hlpjlh97m5js49at(a)4ax.com... >> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:56:39 +1100, "Inertial" <relatively(a)rest.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>>"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message >>>news:3h32r51havo2auhjqfb3h2f06najt4mf63(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:43:07 +1100, "Inertial" <relatively(a)rest.com> >> >>>>>> I understand that Einstein's mathematical approach is valid, though >>>>>> somewhat hyperbolized in a few areas, but fundamentally flawed in >>>>>> premise >>>>>> as to why nature behaves as it does. >>>>>> >>>>>> I doubt that he intentionally perpetrated a hoax, though the results >>>>>> of >>>>>> his efforts prove to be as bad as a hoax, and a very big, serious one, >>>>>> setting science back 75 years. >>>>> >>>>>Hardly .. it advanced greatly due to his work and the other physicists >>>>>of >>>>>his time. >>>> >>>> What about all those floundering astronomers who try to formulate >>>> ridiculous >>>> theories based on the fairytale that all starlight travels towards >>>> little >>>> planet Earth at precisely c? >>> >>>Why would you expect it to travel any differently toward earth than any >>>other planet? >> >> Because light moves at c wrt its source. > >And everything else. ....only in fairyland Henry Wilson... ........A person's IQ = his snipping ability. |