Was Einstein Guilty of Scientific Fraud?
in [Relativity]
|
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 24 Mar 2010 16:02 On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:19:52 -0700 (PDT), Jerry <Cephalobus_alienus(a)comcast.net> wrote: >On Mar 24, 5:01�am, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >> Einstein effectively said to do exactly this. >> >> Take two presynched clocks A and B and separate them by a distance D. >> >> Send time signals from A to B and from B to A. >> >> If tAB =\= tBA then....don't worry about it. Just change one of the clocks so >> tAB DOES equal tBA....then my whole theory becomes true. >> >> Now, as any scientist knows, the deliberate falsification of experimental >> results to fit the theory is a crime that would normally see the perpetrator >> expelled for life. >> >> I want to know how Einstein has been let off the hook for so long..... > >Maybe because Einstein's theories have passed EVERY test in >superlative >fashion? Hahahahha! It has never been tested...... except in the minds of deluded relativists who keep telling each other it has.. >While your pathetic excuse of a theory has passed absolutely NONE? >BaTh >theory consists of one assertion, the speed of light is the sum of c >plus >the speed of the source, plus a zillion ad hoc excuses to explain away >the >fact that neither experiment nor observation support this assertion... > >Jerry Henry Wilson... ........A person's IQ = his snipping ability.
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 24 Mar 2010 16:02 On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:31:31 -0700, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> wrote: >..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > >> Einstein effectively said to do exactly this. >> >> Take two presynched clocks A and B and separate them by a distance D. >> >> Send time signals from A to B and from B to A. >> >> If tAB =\= tBA then....don't worry about it. Just change one of the clocks >> so tAB DOES equal tBA....then my whole theory becomes true. > >Yes, Henri. That's how theories work. You assume stuff, then see what >happens if those assumptions are true. > >> >> Now, as any scientist knows, the deliberate falsification of experimental >> results to fit the theory is a crime that would normally see the >> perpetrator expelled for life. > >Oddly enough you can not show how this is the case, despite a decade of >posting about it on USENET. > >Have you repeated even one experiment that confirms special relativity? > >> >> I want to know how Einstein has been let off the hook for so long..... > >There's that little spark again. You wonder how things could have persisted >for so long, or at all for that matter, if what you say is true. when are you going to say something intelligent? Henry Wilson... ........A person's IQ = his snipping ability.
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 24 Mar 2010 16:09 On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:28:02 -0700 (PDT), valls(a)icmf.inf.cu wrote: >On 24 mar, 05:01, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >> Einstein effectively said to do exactly this. >> >> Take two presynched clocks A and B and separate them by a distance D. >> >> Send time signals from A to B and from B to A. >> >> If tAB =\= tBA then....don't worry about it. Just change one of the clocks so >> tAB DOES equal tBA....then my whole theory becomes true. >> >(Hello Wilson, do you remember me?) > >tAB =\= tBA CAN'T be true for the simple reason that Einstein >establish the equality of tAB and tBA BY DEFINITION. The literal words >in his first relativity paper (30 June 1905) are the following: > >[�we establish BY DEFINITION that the �time� required by light to >travel from A to B equals the �time� it requires to travel from B to >A.] > >The equality tAB = tBA is part of a DEFINITION of �time�. He knew that in that era there were no sufficiently accurate clocks that could be presynched and then separated in order to measure the infamous 'aether wind' in which he firmly believed. So he blatantly advocated 'fiddling' the experimental results if any everbecame available. This is scientific fraud at its worst. >I don't know about any other person before Einstein defining "time" in >that way. Remember that an isotropic constant light velocity, in >ABSOLUTE VACUUM, is a POSTULATE in 1905 Einstein's Relativity Theory. >Remember also that ABSOLUTE VACUUM is an ideal concept. It can never >be present in any real physical experiment. > >RVHG (Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato) Time is a fundamental dimension...like space. It cannot be defined. Henry Wilson... ........A person's IQ = his snipping ability.
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 24 Mar 2010 16:10 On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:52:09 -0000, "Androcles" <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_w> wrote: > >"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message >news:elnjq55ctjtds37055t0goo4c4kg0522p8(a)4ax.com... >> Einstein <snip> >> If tAB =\= tBA then...<snip> >> I want to know how Einstein has been let off the hook <snip> > >That's easy. YOU were one of the cretins that told me tB= tA and Einstein >was right about that. He was..but for entirely the wrong reason. >Now you know why he hasn't been let off the hook. > >Androcles, with a 30 IQ on the cretin Awilson's snipping scale. > > > Henry Wilson... ........A person's IQ = his snipping ability.
From: PD on 24 Mar 2010 16:13
On Mar 24, 3:00 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:16:12 -0700 (PDT), PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >On Mar 24, 5:01 am, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > >> Einstein effectively said to do exactly this. > > >> Take two presynched clocks A and B and separate them by a distance D. > > >> Send time signals from A to B and from B to A. > > >> If tAB =\= tBA then....don't worry about it. Just change one of the clocks so > >> tAB DOES equal tBA....then my whole theory becomes true. > > >> Now, as any scientist knows, the deliberate falsification of experimental > >> results to fit the theory is a crime that would normally see the perpetrator > >> expelled for life. > > >Oh dear. Henri, Henri, Henri. > > >I don't mind you stirring the pot just for the hell of it, but could > >you at least put some thought into it first so that it isn't so > >patently obvious that what you're saying is ill-considered? > > >So if there are two unsynchronized clocks, and one follows a procedure > >to synchronize them, this is falsification of data and scientific > >fraud? > > >So if there is an uncalibrated pH meter, and one starts off an > >analysis of a solution by calibrating the pH meter, is that > >falsification of data and scientific fraud? > > >Really, Henri? Really? Don't you feel the eensiest bit embarrassed? > > Not at all. I'm way ahead of you (and Einstein) on this one. > > The plain fact is, Einstein thought that if an 'aether wind' was blowing > between the clocks, then tAB =\= tBA. Still have to synchronize the clocks before making that measurement. If you don't synchronize the clocks, tAB =\= tBA doesn't tell you anything about aether wind or the absence of it. Similarly, if you don't calibrate a pH meter, then any measurements from the pH meter are useless. > He had to make the aether redundant...so > he concocted his fraudulent methods of doing just that. Little did the > scientific world realise that Fitzgerald and Lorentz had already done that with > their LTs. > > In that era, there were no accurate clocks, so he knew he could say and do > virtually anything he liked and nobody could prove him wrong. > > ......Enter the cesium clock......goodbye Einstein..... Nope. Synchronized atomic clocks confirm Einstein's claim. > > Of course, in actual fact Einstein's definition was perfectly sound because it > is the exact procedure any normal person would use to synch clocks, according > to ballistic theory. Yes, that's so, so you should have no complaint with it. The synch procedure is not specific to SR at all, and in fact it is the procedure that ANY sensible person would use. That was Einstein's point when he said that this is what we MEAN when we say two clocks are synchronized. This is still not falsification of data or scientific fraud, especially since (as you say) the very same procedure would be used according to ballistic theory. This is why it was patently obvious to anyone reading your post that it was ill-considered. You are probably deeply embarrassed by having posted it in the first place. > > >> I want to know how Einstein has been let off the hook for so long..... > > >> Henry Wilson... > > >> .......A person's IQ = his snipping ability. > > Henry Wilson... > > .......A person's IQ = his snipping ability. |