"We Never Use Assembly Language"
in [ASM]
|
From: sevagK on 14 Mar 2006 15:40 Betov wrote: > "sevagK" <kahlinor(a)yahoo.com> écrivait news:1142301695.148972.226240 > @j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com: > > > Rosasm = IDE for converting written assembly to executable/dll > > HIDE = IDE for converting written assembly to executable/dll/library > > Rosasm: can call up debugger, resource editor, help file, etc. > > HIDE can call up debugger, resource editor, help file, etc. > > > > Both get the same job done. > > If so, where are the Links to the Applications written > by the HLA victims, Pathetic idiot? > > > Betov. > Clown, your reply has nothing to do with the above which compares the IDEs and productivity. Mine took less than a year of light dev time, but its abilty to truly integrate with software allows it to compare nearly feature to feature to your IDE which took a decade of heavy dev time. Not only did it take much less time, but the quality of the tools it can integrate with are far superior to anything you've bolted onto Rosasm over the years. -sevag.k www.geocities.com/kahlinor
From: santosh on 14 Mar 2006 15:45 Betov wrote: > "santosh" <santosh.k83(a)gmail.com> écrivait news:1142362124.897202.89930 > @v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com: > > > randyhyde(a)earthlink.net wrote: > >> Personally, I would love to see an alternative to XP as I don't > >> particularly agree with the direction that Vista is taking. > > > > What would be some of the things about Vista that you don't > > particularly like? Do they happen to affect assembly programming? > > How can you ask such a question to a swindler who > never wrote anything in Assembly???!!! Just curious as to what he feels is wrong in the "direction" in which Windows Vista is heading...
From: o//annabee on 14 Mar 2006 16:21 P? Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:06:09 +0100, skrev Betov <betov(a)free.fr>: > "sevagK" <kahlinor(a)yahoo.com> ?crivait news:1142301695.148972.226240 > @j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com: > >> Using *any* macro defeats the rules of assmebly. > > Very good. So, if RosAsm Macros can do this and that, > ... this is not Assembly, and if it cannot do this and > that, this is a weak Assembler. Perfect! > > This recall me of the time when i still had illusions, > when i implemented an "Alternate" Pre-Parser, to assume > most of the other Assemblers formal Syntaxes: > > * Before, the song was: "I will not use it, because the > Syntax is different". > > * After, it was: "If it is the same, then, what's the point > of changing?!". > > :]]]]] I hope its not getting to you. What RosAsm is is a leap towards the future. If some people refuse to see it, is not your fault. RosAsm is still what it really is. I will never give it up! Either RosAsm will flurish, or all its innovations will live on in other tools. Or other tools will stretch to become it. As long as RosAsm is really really something diffrent its ideas will live on. Its impossible that it could not. > > Betov. > > < http://rosasm.org > > > > >
From: o//annabee on 14 Mar 2006 16:24 P? Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:11:29 +0100, skrev Betov <betov(a)free.fr>: > "sevagK" <kahlinor(a)yahoo.com> ?crivait news:1142301695.148972.226240 > @j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com: > >> Rosasm macros have been shown to produce *less* quality assembly code. > > > ???!!!... By who? When? Where? How could User Defined > Macros output anything but what is written by the > Programmer? I am afraid this could be me. But this is macros written by me, not "RosAsm offical macros" > > > Betov. > > < http://rosasm.org > > > >
From: Betov on 14 Mar 2006 16:29
"sevagK" <kahlinor(a)yahoo.com> ?crivait news:1142368846.785967.24630 @z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com: > Clown, your reply has nothing to do with the above which compares the > IDEs and productivity. Mine took less than a year of light dev time, > but its abilty to truly integrate with software allows it to compare > nearly feature to feature to your IDE which took a decade of heavy dev > time. Not only did it take much less time, but the quality of the > tools it can integrate with are far superior to anything you've bolted > onto Rosasm over the years. :]]]]] And you hope tha i will enter in some game of comparison in between your "Window with a Menu devoted to an HLL Pre- Parser runing an usurpated Assembler" and RosAsm???!!!... I love your sens of humour. :)) Betov. < http://rosasm.org > |