"We Never Use Assembly Language"
in [ASM]
|
From: o//annabee on 20 Mar 2006 22:20 P? Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:29:26 +0100, skrev Dragontamer <prtiglao(a)gmail.com>: > > o//annabee wrote: >> P? Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:49:51 +0100, skrev randyhyde(a)earthlink.net >> <randyhyde(a)earthlink.net>: >> >> > >> > o//annabee wrote: >> > so >> >> > I'll continue to play along. >> >> >> >> I am not playing at all. I really want to see this 6 socalled >> >> non-trivial >> >> applications you wrote in assembly. I can find them. I found this >> link. >> >> Is >> >> this the applications you are talking about ? >> > >> > No. >> > Just go to the HLA downloads page. Download the HLA examples. There >> > you've find lots of non-trivial applications written in assembly >> > language. At the link you've listed are *some* of them, but by no >> means >> > most of them or the majority of them. But you can start with >> HLABasic. >> > It's certainly a non-trivial app. Then you might move on to AGE. When >> > you get through those, and understand them completely, come back and >> > I'll tell you about more. >> >> Lol. When I get through them and understand them completly? >> >> Those are written in HLA ? Anyway I can find them. But if true, HLA, >> then >> they are NOT assembly applications. Trivial maybe. > > Here we go again; arguing what an assembly language is instead of > saying why RosAsm is better than HLA or whatever. Theres to much, to _repeat_ > Wannabie; stop worrying *what* an assembly language is, and start > thinking how RosAsm is better than HLA. If we compare RosAsm to NASM, I can say that NASM has ok syntax. But the real diffrence is the insane speed you can work at with RosAsm. > God Damn. > If a friken name means that much to you, then fine; I'll agree. Randall > isn't > teaching assembly programming, but "HLA programming", if it makes a > difference. Yes, take it to another N.G. > And if you don't wanna call it "HLA programming" then call it whatever > you want. alt.lang.suiside.with.hla > A name is a name. A rose by any other name would smell just as sweet. Stink. > Don't > judge a book by its cover. Etc. Etc. Etc. If Randall own words are anything to judge by, then his textconverter is garbage. So much so, that I feel in need to go out to the kitchen right now, and ask the garbage for forgiveness. :) > --Dragontamer >
From: o//annabee on 20 Mar 2006 22:39 P? Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:22:22 +0100, skrev <rhyde(a)cs.ucr.edu>: > So when you ask some *real* questions about those apps, that indicate > you've actually *read* the code (which is what you've been asking for), > we can move forward. I dont read code for an app that I havent seen run first. And I cannot find any apps on your page that is written in assembly. You said there should be six of them? I cant find them. Please supply direct links. > Cheers, > Randy Hyde >
From: Frank Kotler on 21 Mar 2006 01:58 o//annabee wrote: > I dont read code for an app that I havent seen run first. I don't run an app I haven't read the source code to! :) (not literally true, of course) > And I cannot > find any apps on your page that is written in assembly. You said there > should be six of them? > > I cant find them. Please supply direct links. Since you seem to find links challenging, I could post some of Randy's code here. Since you RosAsm guys seem impressed by tonnage, I'll just pick the six biggest ones. Shall I do that? Best, Frank
From: Frank Kotler on 21 Mar 2006 02:11 o//annabee wrote: .... >> LISA had a heck of a lot more users in 1979, back when computer >> companies selling 100,000 systems was considered *very* good, than >> you're likely to *ever* have with RosAsm. And considering that LISA was >> selling for $35 while you're giving your product away, that's pretty >> sad that you have so few users. > > > "Ah, some 100 years ago I created a non-trivial text adventure physics > engine "! While I can't find an actual copy of LISA anywhere, she left some footprints... <http://www.apple2.org.za/mirrors/apple2.caltech.edu/8bit/dev/lisa/lisa.readme> What was the name of your app? Best, Frank
From: o//annabee on 21 Mar 2006 05:45
P? Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:58:56 +0100, skrev Frank Kotler <fbkotler(a)comcast.net>: > o//annabee wrote: > >> I dont read code for an app that I havent seen run first. > > I don't run an app I haven't read the source code to! :) > (not literally true, of course) > >> And I cannot find any apps on your page that is written in assembly. >> You said there should be six of them? >> I cant find them. Please supply direct links. > > Since you seem to find links challenging, I could post some of Randy's > code here. Since you RosAsm guys seem impressed by tonnage, I'll just > pick the six biggest ones. Shall I do that? Why not. I am all for surprices. > > Best, > Frank |