Prev: 1100m below the ground - two interview videos
Next: Reality
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 11 Jun 2010 15:43
Well I really do not much care of the socialization of a theory of
science. In some cases
the public social acceptance of a science truth may take milleniums as
for the case
of heliocentric versus geocentric solar system. For me personally, to
know the truth
of what is true and what is false is enough satisfaction, and whether
the "other persons" do not know
the truth, but clings to a falsehood is alright by me, for to expect
everyone to know
and accept the truth of the world is rather a misguided notion in
itself.

The finest example of socialized science is the Atomic theory itself
starting way back with
Leucippus, Democritus and others. Science truth is known and accepted
by a few
persons, and this small group grows in numbers and strength through
time until finally
the entire social network for the most part understands and accepts
the truth. It took
approximately two milleniums for the social network to accept what
Democritus knew full
well back in Ancient Greek times. It took not quite two milleniums to
accept a round and
revolving Earth in the heliocentric system. There were probably vast
holdouts of believers
until many of the sailors circumnavigated the globe.

For Wegener and Continental Drift, most rational commonsense people
did not need a
seafloor spreading nor a mechanism for seafloor spreading to be
convinced that the
continents of Earth had moved in the past and were moving in the
present. The evidence
was piling up and was pointing to the truth of Continental Drift.
Likewise for the Atom
Totality theory, where the evidence is piling up and eliminating the
Big Bang theory.

For me, the fact of the observational and experimental evidence of a
Blackbody Cosmic
Microwave Background Radiation implies the Cosmos is a quantum cavity.
There is only
one such entity that is quantum cavity-- the interior of an atom. The
Cosmos is one big
atom is the conclusion of the Blackbody Microwave. To most rational,
reasonable commonsense people, whether they are scientists or not
scientists, is enough of a
deciding evidence to understand and accept the Atom Totality theory
and dismiss the
Big Bang theory. But there are many within the science community that
have more of
an irrational mind of science rather than a rational science mind.
They have invested their
time into the Big Bang theory and are not about to admit that they
were ever wrong about
their lifetime of belief in a false theory. For them it may take much
more than the simple
fact of a Blackbody Microwave. For them they would require a proof of
the Dirac New-Radioactivities that creates each successive Atom
Totality from Hydrogen Atom Totality
to Helium Atom Totality all the way up to a Plutonium Atom Totality.
Just as there were
many geologists who would not accept Continental Drift until they saw
a mechanism in
action such as the seafloor spreading. Some were even unconvinced
after the reports
of the Atlantic Ocean seafloor spreading mapps were shown.

So in the case of the Atom Totality theory, many in the science
community are going to
hold fast to their Big Bang even though we have Blackbody Microwave.
They will ignore
it, for they spent all their lifetime in science invested with the Big
Bang. They are not
going to be rational and commonsense about the evidence. To them, they
need not only
the Blackbody Microwave but they need the Dirac "new-radioactivities"
where the cosmic
rays and cosmic gamma ray bursts are newly created matter shot from
the Nucleus of the
Atom Totality. Dirac talks extensively about "new radioactivities" in
his book "Directions in
Physics."

For me, the story is over with and ended as far as the truth of the
Atom Totality and the
fakery of the Big Bang. The story is over with because a Blackbody
Microwave is the end
of the story as to a proof of the Atom Totality. But for most people,
including those in science,
they let their sentiment rule their life's thinking and do not have
the control of their minds
to let logic rule their thinking. To them, Blackbody Microwave is not
enough, and they need
much more, for they need proof of Dirac's new radioactivities.

When I went to college in 1968 to UC and in my freshman year I took a
course in
geology and the professor at UC apologized about the textbook, saying
that it had
little information about the debate of Continental Drift versus Static
Earth. So we can
see how "snail crawling slow is a science community in accepting what
is true and
dismissing what is false." Acceptance of the true theory of a science
moves
as slowly as what Continental Drift moves continents.

Most of us have the misconception that in science, a true theory
replaces the old
fake theory at some breakneck speed. In come the new true theory and
out goes
the old false within a crisp short time. Unfortunately that is rarely
if ever the case.
Old fake theories seem to have a life of their own. And they remain
active false theories
until the general public insists that scientists label them as "false
theories" within the textbooks. So when do we get rid of
fakes like Big Bang, like black-holes? Not until we see in college
textbooks printed
that the Big Bang is a fake or that black-holes were the
misconceptions of scientists
of the 20th and 21st century. Only when the general public expects the
textbook
writers to state that the Big Bang is a false theory and that black-
holes were merely
chimeras in the minds of past scientists.

When I took the geology course in 1968, there was a debate of whether
Continental
Drift or Static Earth was true. And my textbook barely covered the two
theories. Nowadays the textbooks state, or imply, that Static Earth is
a false theory, if they even mention it
at all. False theories of science are usually found in the history of
geology or the history
of physics.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: 1100m below the ground - two interview videos
Next: Reality