From: Tony Toews [MVP] on 28 Jan 2010 14:15 MM <kylix_is(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >Notwithstanding rust, which would be caused by bad >garaging procedures, Bad garaging experience? Could you explain that a bit more? Those parts of Canada which have a lot of salt dumped on the roads because of snow removal techniques would surely like to know the answer. Tony -- Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP Tony's Main MS Access pages - http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm Tony's Microsoft Access Blog - http://msmvps.com/blogs/access/ For a convenient utility to keep your users FEs and other files updated see http://www.autofeupdater.com/ Granite Fleet Manager http://www.granitefleet.com/
From: Ralph on 28 Jan 2010 14:50 Tony Toews [MVP] wrote: > MM <kylix_is(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >> Notwithstanding rust, which would be caused by bad >> garaging procedures, > > Bad garaging experience? Could you explain that a bit more? Those > parts of Canada which have a lot of salt dumped on the roads because > of snow removal techniques would surely like to know the answer. > Perhaps he means that vehicles, top and bottom, should be spray-washed with fresh water and then forced-air dried as a part of the "garaging" process? Or maybe not having a garage? In any case it seems everything except rust can be blamed on evil Capitalists. Rust apparently is still the responsibility of the owner. -ralph
From: Nobody on 28 Jan 2010 15:06 "Tony Toews [MVP]" <ttoews(a)telusplanet.net> wrote in message news:kfo3m5tnq3sldc33e9mvs4i74knh2onrdq(a)4ax.com... > MM <kylix_is(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >>Notwithstanding rust, which would be caused by bad >>garaging procedures, > > Bad garaging experience? Could you explain that a bit more? Those > parts of Canada which have a lot of salt dumped on the roads because > of snow removal techniques would surely like to know the answer. Off topic: Maybe he meant humidity control.
From: Karl E. Peterson on 28 Jan 2010 16:21 It happens that MM formulated : > On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:15:29 -0800, Karl E. Peterson <karl(a)exmvps.org> > wrote: > >> Office, afterall, >> achieved "Good Enough" eight or ten years ago. > > Huh, I'm still using Word 97. Nothing wrong with that. Although I found incremental improvements up to about Office 2003. Basically, you just say I'm being overly understated, which I suppose I should take in a positive way coming from a Brit. <g> -- ..NET: It's About Trust! http://vfred.mvps.org
From: Karl E. Peterson on 28 Jan 2010 16:23
MM wrote : >> The big difference is, cars *do* wear out. > > Nope. Even that statement is not necessarily true. Cars can be > repaired. Most *every*thing can be repaired if it was designed right > in the first place. The operative word there is *can*. Software is like Superman - invulnerable. Except to MS-Kryptonite. -- ..NET: It's About Trust! http://vfred.mvps.org |