Prev: 'Relativistic' "Doppler" shift
Next: Maximal Ideals
From: spudnik on 1 Aug 2010 00:05
I know; cracking the books & the lab-door are quite
a bit more of interest than the self-imposed ghettos
of Usenet.

> enough of idiocy

thus:
I just found abok that addresses many of the concerns
-- from a brief perusal of about three "random" openings, and
of the index -- of the Truthers;
it's from 2005, by a couple of NYTimes reporters,
_102 Minutes_, which was the time
from the attack of the north tower (WTC1) to its fall (as you know,
the first to be hit & last to fall).

thus: I'll huff and I'll puff....
have you ever proven a theorem in (say) constructive geometry?
> Ahahahaha...

thus: there are two 3d versions of the pythag.thm.,
each with different dimensional attributes....
iff you don't study Fermat's numbertheorie,
you're up Shitz Creek without a paddle; however,
it is better to start with his "reconstruction
of Euclid's porisms," although they are just planar
(synthetic geometry: see "Geometrical Fragments,"
belowsville .-)

thus: and, the other half d'oil evaporates, as has
been shown of late (again) in the newspapers. Congress and
the Administration are a bit behind, in using Iran Oil's
big blow-out in the Gulf, to leverage BP's cap&trade nostrum; eh?

a-yup: Such microbes have
been found in every ocean of the world sampled, from the Arctic
Antarctica. But there are reasons to think that the process may occur
more quickly in the Gulf than in other oceans.

--les ducs d'oil!
http://tarpley.net/online-books/

--Light, A History!
http://wlym.com/~animations/fermat/index.html
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: 'Relativistic' "Doppler" shift
Next: Maximal Ideals