From: N4469P on
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:14:13 -0600, blacky wrote:

> Wheel <tyre(a)hub.axle> wrote in
> news:7t4%m.17592$jj1.13329(a)newsfe12.ams2:
>
>> Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>> Wheel <tyre(a)hub.axle> wrote in
>>> news:s93%m.17581$jj1.9330(a)newsfe12.ams2:
>>>
>>>> I can not understand your tenacious insistence that I have
>>>> installed the .zip version of the application.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Because when I unzip the file and run the chrome.exe it brings up
>>> an install window.
>>
>> I'll just have to accept; that is your situation.
>>
> I experienced precisely what you did.

sew we have a consortium, Bottoms has terds in his head.
From: Wheel on
blacky wrote:
> Wheel <tyre(a)hub.axle> wrote in
> news:7t4%m.17592$jj1.13329(a)newsfe12.ams2:
>
>> Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>> Wheel <tyre(a)hub.axle> wrote in
>>> news:s93%m.17581$jj1.9330(a)newsfe12.ams2:
>>>
>>>> I can not understand your tenacious insistence that I have
>>>> installed the .zip version of the application.
>>>>
>>> Because when I unzip the file and run the chrome.exe it brings up
>>> an install window.
>> I'll just have to accept; that is your situation.
>>
> I experienced precisely what you did.

I'll see if my post to Bear Bottoms is accepted.

Thanks.

From: Wheel on
Bear Bottoms wrote:
> Bear Bottoms <REMOVEbearbottoms1(a)gmail.com> wrote in
> news:Xns9CF282D6D9821bearbottoms1gmailcom(a)69.16.185.247:
>
>> Very strange behavior though.
>
> Running Chrome.exe also causes a new folder named 1.3.4.0 of virtually the
> same size as the folder 1.3.3.0
>
> Very strange goings on indeed.
>

That's because you have allowed it to upgrade to the current
version v1.3.4.0
From: Bob Adkins on
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:46:04 GMT, Bear Bottoms
<REMOVEbearbottoms1(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>hummingbird <hummingb�rd(a)127.0.0.1> wrote in
>news:1d5b5363cdcaade7e9ff9e913ee5153f(a)aracari.127.0.0.1:
>
>> Do you know if this zipped version is a portable version of
>> ChromePlus or does it just have an installer inside?:
>>
>> http://www.chromeplus.org/update/ChromePlus1.3.3.0.zip
>>
>>
>
>It is an upgrade installer.

Actually, it's portable Bear. I just unzip it to any folder and run
it.
From: Wheel on
Bear Bottoms wrote:
> Wheel <tyre(a)hub.axle> wrote in news:Kp8%m.17601$jj1.9941(a)newsfe12.ams2:
>
>> Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>> Bear Bottoms <REMOVEbearbottoms1(a)gmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:Xns9CF282D6D9821bearbottoms1gmailcom(a)69.16.185.247:
>>>
>>>> Very strange behavior though.
>>> Running Chrome.exe also causes a new folder named 1.3.4.0 of
>>> virtually the same size as the folder 1.3.3.0
>>>
>>> Very strange goings on indeed.
>>>
>> That's because you have allowed it to upgrade to the current
>> version v1.3.4.0
>>
>
> I did nothing other than run the chrome.exe...the rest it did on its own.
> Even your comments are strange to me. I didn't ALLOW anything. There are
> reasons why these things are happening...certainly, but you resist my
> comments until deathly proven then relent. Go with it...the events as I
> described them since our first discussion of this are factual.
>
> Let me retrace for you.
> 1. Unzip to a folder
> 2. Place a file named First Run (no extension) in the folder with
> chrome.exe
> 3. Put the entire folder on a USB stick
> 4. Ran chrome.exe on a computer that never had chrome installed on it.
>
> The browser opened, but a folder 1.3.4.0 and file new_chrome.exe was
> created when chrome.exe was run.
>
> I closed the browser and reopened it. A file named old_chrome.exe
> replaced the file new_chrome.exe
>
> No dialog boxes were offered.
>

I do not allow any program to call out when first run until I
do some configuring. Auto-Update is set by default, which tends
to execute as soon as the program is loaded.

I configure and run my machine in a very restricted manner and
will not allow this program to auto-update itself.

All I can say is: Since the start of this exchange the program
has been updated, as can be verified on the site. I assume the
folder 1.3.4.0 and the replacement of the executable is related
to this. I won't go there.

You must know I'm a bit of a tweaker, hence, preferring highly
configurable programs that can be integrated into my system or
tight single purpose utilities.

I don't like 'Chrome', it's too big and not easily controlled,
preferring 'Opera Portable', which is smaller, just as fast,
and has modes of operation that compliment my main browser.

I only entertained 'ChromePlus' for reasons already stated; it
will soon be discarded.

Because we operate our machines differently, all I can say
is it hasn't happened to me.

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Prev: Farewell Kerio continued
Next: SimplyRAR for Windows?