What are space and time?
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Quantum Gravity 400.5: Why is P(B) or P(AB) = 2P(A) - 1 Optimal Rather than nP(A) - 1, n > 2?
Next: Quantum Gravity 400.6: Mechanical Advantage in Terms of Force, Distances, Probabilities
From: JT on 18 Jul 2010 05:33 On 18 Juli, 10:47, Michael Gordge <mikegor...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > On Jul 18, 1:47 pm, Huang <huangxienc...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > My view of spacetime is more aligned with Einstein than Kant. > > You have yet to explain how to identify time from any other concept, > why is that? > > Why have you used spacetime as if it has a meaning of its own? > > How does spacetime differ from time and space? > > MG Nonesimulated space is basicly the cubic volume of a part of Euclidian space. It has volume quantity by the masses that occupy and encloses it. And this cubic space or volume can be plotted with just three dimensions. Space do not curve, mass that travel space may not travel in a straight line due to mass of gravitational forces but there is no curved space. Time is the ***universal nonevariant linear ratio*** we chosen to measure motion and change, when causual events take place(sets off). On a higher level these causual events is governed by logical determinism, namely ***positional particle/mass existence**** vs ***void*** in the f three dimensional order/cosmos of Euclidian space. Field propagation of ***positional particle/mass existence*** is instant, there is no transmission delay ***instant field collapse and interaction***. Fields do not propagate, waves in matter and particles do. At a field collaps all interacting fields notified instantly. If you do not provoke minds you really did not say anything. JT
From: Sam Wormley on 18 Jul 2010 05:48 On 7/18/10 4:33 AM, JT wrote: > Time is the ***universal nonevariant linear ratio*** we chosen to > measure motion and change, when causual events take place(sets off). Not so. Time is not independent of space. Read this 1905 paper ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
From: JT on 18 Jul 2010 05:58 On 18 Juli, 11:48, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/18/10 4:33 AM, JT wrote: > > > Time is the ***universal nonevariant linear ratio*** we chosen to > > measure motion and change, when causual events take place(sets off). > > Not so. Time is not independent of space. Read this 1905 paper > > ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES > http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ Even if i beleived in time dilation it really would be delayed variant time units ala SR, that is not time Sam time is the nonevariant flow of change it is not the variant units that you hold so dear. I think i have to go Seto and declare PROPER TIME. JT
From: Sam Wormley on 18 Jul 2010 06:05 On 7/18/10 4:58 AM, JT wrote: > On 18 Juli, 11:48, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 7/18/10 4:33 AM, JT wrote: >> >>> Time is the ***universal nonevariant linear ratio*** we chosen to >>> measure motion and change, when causual events take place(sets off). >> >> Not so. Time is not independent of space. Read this 1905 paper >> >> ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES >> http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ > > Even if i beleived in time dilation it really would be delayed variant > time units ala SR, that is not time Sam time is the nonevariant flow > of change it is not the variant units that you hold so dear. I think i > have to go Seto and declare PROPER TIME. > > JT You do like to ignore both theory and evidence, don't you JT? Physics FAQ: What is the experimental basis of Special Relativity? http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html
From: JT on 18 Jul 2010 06:22
On 18 Juli, 12:05, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/18/10 4:58 AM, JT wrote: > > > > > > > On 18 Juli, 11:48, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 7/18/10 4:33 AM, JT wrote: > > >>> Time is the ***universal nonevariant linear ratio*** we chosen to > >>> measure motion and change, when causual events take place(sets off). > > >> Not so. Time is not independent of space. Read this 1905 paper > > >> ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES > >> http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ > > > Even if i beleived in time dilation it really would be delayed variant > > time units ala SR, that is not time Sam time is the nonevariant flow > > of change it is not the variant units that you hold so dear. I think i > > have to go Seto and declare PROPER TIME. > > > JT > > You do like to ignore both theory and evidence, don't you JT? > > Physics FAQ: What is the experimental basis of Special Relativity? > http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html- Dölj citerad text - > > - Visa citerad text - No Sam time is the ***universal rate*** that a pulsar flickers with using a ***nonevariant unit***. Units are nonevariant according to your Dear SR theory clocks around the equatorial band would be slower then clocks at the fixed poles and it simply do not happen. JT |