What are space and time?
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Quantum Gravity 400.5: Why is P(B) or P(AB) = 2P(A) - 1 Optimal Rather than nP(A) - 1, n > 2?
Next: Quantum Gravity 400.6: Mechanical Advantage in Terms of Force, Distances, Probabilities
From: Michael Gordge on 11 Jul 2010 23:52 On Jul 12, 11:53 am, Immortalist <reanimater_2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Your proposing at least two separate arguments at > once disguised as one argument. Nope, you are. > What your leaving out is a > justification for the theory of necessity. You are equating epistemology to metaphysics, very Kantian and very stupid. MG
From: spudnik on 12 Jul 2010 14:50 yeah, but are the rubber glasses, 3d, or the clocks? > ... so, I said, "Hey, Einstein, space and time are made of rubber! > "Just kidding, dood." > I am, however, not implying that he was a surfer, but > he did know the canonical surfer's value ... of pi. thus&so: it's just his bot, as far as I can tell, without researching it ... googoling would be way too much positive feedback, and that's unpositively moderation. anyway, what difference between lightwaves and rocks o'light, vis-a-vu the curvature of space (as was uncovered by You now who & you know whO-oo, in the 18th and BCE centuries (or 2nd and Minus Oneth millenia ?-) also, don't forget the ... well, their are a few of them! > If only the esteemed colleagues know, what good? thus&so: it's typically considered to be perpendicular to all of the three spatial directions; at least, in some abstract sense. anyway, I invented the terminology; so ,there.... um, perpendicular Universes: http://www.relativitybook.com/resources/Einstein_space.html http://www.ctr4process.org/publications/Articles/LSI05/Cahill-FinalPa... --BP's cap™ call of brokers the group! association http://tarpley.net
From: kado on 14 Jul 2010 05:24 On Jul 11, 8:50 pm, Michael Gordge <mikegor...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > On Jul 11, 4:54 pm, "k...(a)nventure.com" <k...(a)nventure.com> wrote: > > > There are many that are smart, and many that are not. > > So are your smart enough to answer -- What is it about time that you > and "mainline science" do not understand? Time. > > > There are fewer that are very smart and only a very few > > that are exceptionally smart - > > So are you exceptionally smart enough to explain what it is about time > that you and "mainline science" do not understand? TIME! > > > Then there are those that are so dumb that they > > think they are smart - > > So do you think you are smart enough to explain what it about time > that you claim "mainline science" doesn't understand? Never stated, claimed, or implied that. > > MG Having to explain the clear and simple message contained in the sentences of my original post empirically demonstrates the truth of the last statement that: There are those that are so dumb that they think they are smart. D.Y.K.
From: Michael Gordge on 14 Jul 2010 05:40 On Jul 14, 6:24 pm, "k...(a)nventure.com" <k...(a)nventure.com> wrote: > Having to explain the clear and simple message.............. You said: "So it can safely be said that mainline science does not understand time or space. Period!" It's a simple question ---- What do you mean by "time" in your claim ...."that mainline science does not understand time or space. Period"? MG
From: Michael Gordge on 14 Jul 2010 05:48
On Jul 12, 11:53 am, Immortalist <reanimater_2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jul 8, 2:01 am, Michael Gordge <mikegor...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > > > On Jul 8, 11:40 am, Immortalist <reanimater_2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > What are space and time? > > > > What sort of things are they if they are things? > > > Space is matter, it exists regardless of man's mind, time is a man > > made mind dependent concept. > > Is that a human theory, that matter exists necessarily or that > something being necessary makes it an irrefutable fact? Does that question make any sense to you? MG |