What does a gluon look like?
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Magentic monopole is half a gluon
Next: X-37B
From: john on 20 Apr 2010 10:20 On Apr 15, 12:29 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> writes: > >Simple, tidy, elegant. > > Illucid, word salad, idiot. Galaxies are made from atoms. Atoms are fusing in stars causing the stars to radiate. The stars radiate photons and neutrinos. The photons result from the heat of fusion, but photons are given off in many energy events including static electricity discharge. The neutrinos are given off *because of* the fusion. These neutrinos are absorbed by galactic centers and provides the gravity between them. They do not provide *our* gravity. They are much too big. Electrons are not points- they are made from electron matter. Electron matter is atoms that are as much smaller than our atoms as our atoms are smaller than galaxies. (This per the Galaxy Model for the Atom http://users.accesscomm.ca/john which you denigrated as early as 2003) ;) They are about 10 to the 27 times smaller. This electron matter is spread out as a cloud of star-like points that I call orts. As in our stars, matter is constantly fusing in these orts, and the orts are consequently radiating. The photons and neutrinos coming from these orts are 10 to the 27 times smaller than the ones coming from our sun. These are the neutrinos that cause *our* gravity. (I know, Michael, it's *so* idiotic) john p.s. It's Hydrogen fusing in stars, yes, but the main fusion happening is the positive and negative HEPs that were separated in the galactic center and shot out the opposite jets are now coming back together to form Hydrogen and giving off neutrinos. This Hydrogen is then fused to Helium, giving off yet more units of surplus spin. jss
From: Sam Wormley on 20 Apr 2010 13:12 On 4/20/10 9:20 AM, john wrote: > Galaxies are made from atoms[, molecules, dust and stars]. > Atoms are fusing in stars causing the > stars to radiate. Everything radiates. The requirement for radiating photons is temperature. > The stars radiate photons and neutrinos. And emit solar winds too.
From: Y.Porat on 20 Apr 2010 13:17 On Apr 15, 8:29 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> writes: > >Simple, tidy, elegant. > > Illucid, word salad, idiot. -------------- so Genius Moroney tell us what are your Gluons ?? TIA Y.Porat ---------------------------------
From: PD on 20 Apr 2010 13:24 On Apr 15, 1:07 am, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote: > Does it have no volume like an electron? > Does it have no shape like all the > parts of the standard model? John, first of all, "look like" is a statement that can only be made about things that are larger than a micron or so. The reason is that visual appearance relies on bouncing light off the features of the object, and visible light (which has a wavelength of a few hundred nanometers) will not bounce off objects smaller than its wavelength in the usual sense. Visual appearance is something that only applies to things of a certain size and above. Secondly, shape is something that only applies to objects with volume and boundaries. A diffuse gas cloud, a macroscopic object, doesn't even have a shape, although you can draw an isosurface around the region that has a certain density and above (even though the cloud will extend quite a bit further than that). Even the clouds in the sky don't have the shape you see. That's simply the boundary where light scattering off the water vapor crosses a certain threshold -- the cloud extends quite a bit further than that and in a way that doesn't have a clear boundary. Moreover, volume is a property of composite objects only, and the volume is due to the interaction between the constituents more than it has to to with the size of the constituents. Think about that for a minute. A salt crystal has volume, but it is NOT the volume of the ions added up. The volume is determined by how far apart the ions are held from each other by the quantum mechanical electrostatic interactions between the ions. Same is true for the atom, where the size of the atom comes strictly from the electromagnetic interaction between the electrons and the nucleus. Same is true for the nucleus, where the size of the nucleus is not the sum of the sizes of the protons and neutrons but is instead due to the interactions between the protons and neutrons. To avoid making the mistake that the microscopic world is just like the macroscopic world all over again, it will help to understand where the properties of the macroscopic world come from in the first place. > > "In the weird, weird world of > quantum, we know we're right if nothing makes > sense. It's all real different > down there, little feller, and you can't > even imagine it." > > What a total crock. > > Talk about word salad, illucid, and idiot. > > Here's a way better story: > every level makes its own gravity. > Galaxies are made from atoms. The fusion > of these atoms in suns gives off neutrinos. > Neutrinos mediate gravity between galaxies > > Electrons are made from electron matter. > The fusion of the electron matter that is > happening all the time within the electron > gives off the radiation that mediates our gravity- > the gravity between atoms. > > Simple, tidy, elegant. > > john
From: BURT on 20 Apr 2010 16:21
On Apr 20, 10:25 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 20, 12:17 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Apr 15, 8:29 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > > wrote: > > > > john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> writes: > > > >Simple, tidy, elegant. > > > > Illucid, word salad, idiot. > > > -------------- > > so Genius Moroney > > > tell us what are your Gluons ?? > > Why do you need to be taught this here, when you can go towww.google.com > and type in "gluon"? > > > > > > > TIA > > Y.Porat > > ---------------------------------- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Who saw virtual light? |