What does this mean please?
in [Visual Objects]
|
From: Geoff Schaller on 27 May 2007 08:35 ? Not sure your point is relevant. I fix bugs of my making and don't charge too. However, when I am going to charge money, my clients know in advance and also what to expect for their money. "Ginny Caughey" <ginny.caughey.online(a)wasteworks.com> wrote in message news:465973b6$0$30507$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com: > Geoff, > > > > is that isn't any new feature provided in the upgrade, just compatibility > > with the new VO compiler and Vista. Both are things I have to provide my > > clients for no cost. > > > Just because you don't choose to charge your customers for your labor > doesn't imply that no one else should. > > Ginny
From: Ginny Caughey on 27 May 2007 09:07 And you know in advance that you have to pay for VOPP for VO 2.8. You can choose to do so or not. VO 2.8 is usable without VOPP, so it's a choice you get to make. -- Ginny "Geoff Schaller" <geoff_(a)software_objectives.com.au> wrote in message news:46597b2f$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au... > ? > > Not sure your point is relevant. I fix bugs of my making and don't charge > too. However, when I am going to charge money, my clients know in advance > and also what to expect for their money. > > > > "Ginny Caughey" <ginny.caughey.online(a)wasteworks.com> wrote in message > news:465973b6$0$30507$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com: > >> Geoff, >> >> >> > is that isn't any new feature provided in the upgrade, just >> > compatibility >> > with the new VO compiler and Vista. Both are things I have to provide >> > my >> > clients for no cost. >> >> >> Just because you don't choose to charge your customers for your labor >> doesn't imply that no one else should. >> >> Ginny >
From: Filip Fransen on 27 May 2007 09:17 I had to pay for : 2.5:v3 2.6:v3.04 2.7:v3.10 2.8:v3.20 Filip "Ginny Caughey" <ginny.caughey.online(a)wasteworks.com> wrote in message news:46597e1b$0$30505$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... > And you know in advance that you have to pay for VOPP for VO 2.8. You can > choose to do so or not. VO 2.8 is usable without VOPP, so it's a choice > you get to make. > > -- > Ginny > > > "Geoff Schaller" <geoff_(a)software_objectives.com.au> wrote in message > news:46597b2f$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au... >> ? >> >> Not sure your point is relevant. I fix bugs of my making and don't charge >> too. However, when I am going to charge money, my clients know in advance >> and also what to expect for their money. >> >> >> >> "Ginny Caughey" <ginny.caughey.online(a)wasteworks.com> wrote in message >> news:465973b6$0$30507$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com: >> >>> Geoff, >>> >>> >>> > is that isn't any new feature provided in the upgrade, just >>> > compatibility >>> > with the new VO compiler and Vista. Both are things I have to provide >>> > my >>> > clients for no cost. >>> >>> >>> Just because you don't choose to charge your customers for your labor >>> doesn't imply that no one else should. >>> >>> Ginny >> >
From: Geoff Schaller on 27 May 2007 09:31 No I didn't. Hence my point. "Ginny Caughey" <ginny.caughey.online(a)wasteworks.com> wrote in message news:46597e1b$0$30505$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com: > And you know in advance that you have to pay for VOPP for VO 2.8. You can > choose to do so or not. VO 2.8 is usable without VOPP, so it's a choice you > get to make. > > -- > Ginny
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Phantom errors Next: VO2Oracle - storing and retrieving images in the database |