From: CellShocked on
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:11:06 -0700 (PDT), Proteus IIV
<proteusiiv(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>On Oct 20, 8:35�pm, CellShocked
><cellshoc...(a)thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:58:11 -0700, Rich Grise <richgr...(a)example.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:47:18 -0700, CellShocked wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:46:43 -0500, Lostgallifreyan <no-...(a)nowhere.net>
>> >>>CellShocked <cellshoc...(a)thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote in
>>
>> >>>>>> This is true, but when the point is to think in terms of a pairing as
>> >>>>>> default state that would be like having to always explicitly specify
>> >>>>>> multiples of the scissor, or the trouser.
>>
>> >>>>>When's the last time you needed a schematic of a scissor or a trouser? ;-)
>>
>> >>>>>Why do they wear a pair of panties but only one bra? ;-)
>>
>> >>>> � Then, there is the hot dogs / buns thing.
>>
>> >>>Double entendre? Or is that just the single entendre?
>>
>> >> � Hot dogs are sold in packs of ten, while hot dog buns are sold in packs
>> >> of eight.
>>
>> >That's so you can take the two leftover weiners, cut them up, and put
>> >them in your mac&cheese. ;-)
>>
>> >Cheers!
>> >Rich
>>
>> �I do Mac-Chee-Tuna-Pea.
>>
>> � I don't do Mac-Chee-DogBits.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text
>
>YOU MUST HAVE INHALED TROLL GASES
>
>GO SEE A DOCTOR
>
>I AM PROTEUS


Go away, stupid troll.
From: Proteus IIV on
On Oct 21, 7:26 am, CellShocked
<cellshoc...(a)thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:11:06 -0700 (PDT), Proteus IIV
>
>
>
>
>
> <proteus...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Oct 20, 8:35 pm, CellShocked
> ><cellshoc...(a)thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:58:11 -0700, Rich Grise <richgr...(a)example.net>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:47:18 -0700, CellShocked wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:46:43 -0500, Lostgallifreyan <no-...(a)nowhere..net>
> >> >>>CellShocked <cellshoc...(a)thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote in
>
> >> >>>>>> This is true, but when the point is to think in terms of a pairing as
> >> >>>>>> default state that would be like having to always explicitly specify
> >> >>>>>> multiples of the scissor, or the trouser.
>
> >> >>>>>When's the last time you needed a schematic of a scissor or a trouser? ;-)
>
> >> >>>>>Why do they wear a pair of panties but only one bra? ;-)
>
> >> >>>>   Then, there is the hot dogs / buns thing.
>
> >> >>>Double entendre? Or is that just the single entendre?
>
> >> >>   Hot dogs are sold in packs of ten, while hot dog buns are sold in packs
> >> >> of eight.
>
> >> >That's so you can take the two leftover weiners, cut them up, and put
> >> >them in your mac&cheese. ;-)
>
> >> >Cheers!
> >> >Rich
>
> >>  I do Mac-Chee-Tuna-Pea.
>
> >>   I don't do Mac-Chee-DogBits.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text
>
> >YOU MUST HAVE INHALED TROLL GASES
>
> >GO SEE A DOCTOR
>
> >I AM PROTEUS
>
>  Go away, stupid troll.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

YOU ARE CONFUSED

AND YES YOU DO BELONG IN A CELL

I AM PROTEUS
From: Eddie on
On 00:12 16 Oct 2009, Lostgallifreyan wrote:

> Eddie <dummy(a)invalid.com> wrote in
> news:Xns9CA5B35E7A5FA91F3A2(a)feeder.eternal-september.org:
>
>> [...]
>
> Here's an idea...
> For mono, do the usual, the circle and bar. If you were using
> it in a block diagram you'd get by with one pin coming off the
> circle at the point opposite the bar's contact with the circle,
> otherwise two, each slightly offset from that position, and
> parallel.
>
> For stereo, use the two overlapping circles, and a bar joining
> tangents on each and extending to a point at each end
> coexistent with a tangent on the points most distant from each
> other on the double-circle pattern. (Bar is this same length
> now). Add one pin to each circle as before, for block diagrams,
> and for schematics, a third extending from the circle
> intersection point out to a point halfway between the outer
> ends of the other pins.
>
> Stereo mics do exist, so this symbol makes sense, it fits
> existing conventions, and isn't going to get confused with a
> current source symbol because that has no bar, and its pins are
> in line, not offset.
>
> I could have just drawn this, but I have no file hosting
> arranged, and figuring that out is a lot harder than saying
> this stuff..

Hello Lostgallifreyan, thank you for the detailed reply. I'm the
original poster. (Sorry for the delay in replying.) I'm not sure I
can see what you are describing.

(A) What does the following mean?

"bar joining tangents on each"

Does it mean a bar which passes thru the intersection of many pairs
of tangents where each tangents in a pair is drawn from a points
which is situated as if it were the mirror image of the other? This
would be a bar drawn down the middle of the overlapping circles.

(B) I'm not sure about this other part of our description:

"extending to a point at each end coexistent with
a tangent on the points most distant from each
other on the double-circle pattern"

Those "Points on the double circle pattern most distant from each
other" would presumably be those points on the 'outer edges' of the
double-circle. I don't see a single tangent which passes through
those two points. Perhaps you mean a tangent which touches each
circle at the point(s) which are the furtherest possible from one
other while still permitting the existence a common tangent.

(C) What about the overlap of the circles? Do your circles overlap
by a radius? (Such that one circle goes through the other's centre).
Or is the overlap more like half a radius?

Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
suggesting for stereo!
From: Lostgallifreyan on
Eddie <invalid(a)mail.com> wrote in news:Xns9CB423AEF2856F3QA2(a)feeder.eternal-
september.org:

> Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
> more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
> suggesting for stereo!
>
>

Ok, I haven't got picture (or any) hosting so you'll need to tell me
somewhere to send it.

If someone can remind me what the right group is called for this I'll try
sending it there too.
From: Michael A. Terrell on

Lostgallifreyan wrote:
>
> Eddie <invalid(a)mail.com> wrote in news:Xns9CB423AEF2856F3QA2(a)feeder.eternal-
> september.org:
>
> > Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
> > more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
> > suggesting for stereo!
> >
> >
>
> Ok, I haven't got picture (or any) hosting so you'll need to tell me
> somewhere to send it.
>
> If someone can remind me what the right group is called for this I'll try
> sending it there too.


news:alt.binaries.schematics.electronics


--
The movie 'Deliverance' isn't a documentary!
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Prev: Need heater strip circuit
Next: ua741