From: Jim Thompson on
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:26:17 -0800, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
<paul(a)hovnanian.com> wrote:

>Jim Thompson wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:28:57 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
>> <Paul(a)Hovnanian.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I found my old HP-41C curve fit program card. Then I found my old
>>>HP-41C.
>>>
>>>The model I get from your curve is:
>>>
>>>.MODEL MyWhiteLED D
>>>+ IS = 4.4249E-9
>>>+ N = 8.3923
>>>+ RS = 7.7980
>>>
>>>No subcircuits required.
>>
>> I'm not sure if that will work over temperature.
>>
>> It would be interesting if someone could take data at several
>> different temperatures. It'll be tricky, you have to be quick or
>> self-heating will screw up the result. Maybe with a plotting curve
>> tracer?
>
>That's a good point. N is often used as a 'fudge factor' for Vt, so for wild
>values of N (greater than 2.0 or less than 1.0) it would be reasonable to
>expect that nVt may vary with temp (or other conditions) in some different
>manner than kT/q.
>
>Where I've seen weird values of N pop up, SPICE started to fall apart for
>anything other then approximate values. It was time to toss the standard
>model and go with something cooked up by the physicists.
>

EG is also a variable of interest.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
From: Jim Thompson on
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:36:28 -0800, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
<paul(a)hovnanian.com> wrote:

>Jim Thompson wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:28:57 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
>> <Paul(a)Hovnanian.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I found my old HP-41C curve fit program card. Then I found my old
>>>HP-41C.
>>>
>>>The model I get from your curve is:
>>>
>>>.MODEL MyWhiteLED D
>>>+ IS = 4.4249E-9
>>>+ N = 8.3923
>>>+ RS = 7.7980
>>>
>>>No subcircuits required.
>>
>> BTW: "your curve"? Whose curve? You clip too much, Paul.
>
>Sorry. I took your spice model from your post, ran it for 70 current points
>and poked every tenth one into my program. I didn't have the table function
>values (the PDF you posted in a.b.s.e which I assume were your original
>measured data points). By the way, there appears to be an outlying data
>point in your graph.
>
>So I was actually curve fitting to your curve fit.

I finally figured that out ;-) I first thought someone I had filtered
out, like from googlegroups, had posted some data ;-)

The "outlying data point" is an unknown, so PSpice stops and _holds_
at the last PWL data point.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
From: Paul Hovnanian P.E. on
Jim Thompson wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:26:17 -0800, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
> <paul(a)hovnanian.com> wrote:
>
> >Jim Thompson wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:28:57 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
> >> <Paul(a)Hovnanian.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>I found my old HP-41C curve fit program card. Then I found my old
> >>>HP-41C.
> >>>
> >>>The model I get from your curve is:
> >>>
> >>>.MODEL MyWhiteLED D
> >>>+ IS = 4.4249E-9
> >>>+ N = 8.3923
> >>>+ RS = 7.7980
> >>>
> >>>No subcircuits required.
> >>
> >> I'm not sure if that will work over temperature.
> >>
> >> It would be interesting if someone could take data at several
> >> different temperatures. It'll be tricky, you have to be quick or
> >> self-heating will screw up the result. Maybe with a plotting curve
> >> tracer?
> >
> >That's a good point. N is often used as a 'fudge factor' for Vt, so for wild
> >values of N (greater than 2.0 or less than 1.0) it would be reasonable to
> >expect that nVt may vary with temp (or other conditions) in some different
> >manner than kT/q.
> >
> >Where I've seen weird values of N pop up, SPICE started to fall apart for
> >anything other then approximate values. It was time to toss the standard
> >model and go with something cooked up by the physicists.
> >
>
> EG is also a variable of interest.

Right. That kicks in when you model diode's temperature dependence. But
here's a question: What happens to the original subcircuit based model,
which is based on a 1N4148? The activation energy isn't specified, so
you're going to get Spice's default (probably for a silicon diode). As
we are dealing with a (probably) blue LED, the chemistry will be
diffeent, and we probably should find a more appropriate value for EG.

--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:Paul(a)Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
professor; n, One who talks in someone else's sleep.
From: Jim Thompson on
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:35:13 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
<Paul(a)Hovnanian.com> wrote:

>Jim Thompson wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:26:17 -0800, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
>> <paul(a)hovnanian.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Jim Thompson wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:28:57 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
>> >> <Paul(a)Hovnanian.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>I found my old HP-41C curve fit program card. Then I found my old
>> >>>HP-41C.
>> >>>
>> >>>The model I get from your curve is:
>> >>>
>> >>>.MODEL MyWhiteLED D
>> >>>+ IS = 4.4249E-9
>> >>>+ N = 8.3923
>> >>>+ RS = 7.7980
>> >>>
>> >>>No subcircuits required.
>> >>
>> >> I'm not sure if that will work over temperature.
>> >>
>> >> It would be interesting if someone could take data at several
>> >> different temperatures. It'll be tricky, you have to be quick or
>> >> self-heating will screw up the result. Maybe with a plotting curve
>> >> tracer?
>> >
>> >That's a good point. N is often used as a 'fudge factor' for Vt, so for wild
>> >values of N (greater than 2.0 or less than 1.0) it would be reasonable to
>> >expect that nVt may vary with temp (or other conditions) in some different
>> >manner than kT/q.
>> >
>> >Where I've seen weird values of N pop up, SPICE started to fall apart for
>> >anything other then approximate values. It was time to toss the standard
>> >model and go with something cooked up by the physicists.
>> >
>>
>> EG is also a variable of interest.
>
>Right. That kicks in when you model diode's temperature dependence. But
>here's a question: What happens to the original subcircuit based model,
>which is based on a 1N4148? The activation energy isn't specified, so
>you're going to get Spice's default (probably for a silicon diode). As
>we are dealing with a (probably) blue LED, the chemistry will be
>diffeent, and we probably should find a more appropriate value for EG.

I agree. My subcircuit fit was accidentally fallen into while just
noodling around ;-)

If someone will take data at 3 or more temperatures, I'll try to fit
it.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
From: Paul Hovnanian P.E. on
Jim Thompson wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:36:28 -0800, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
> <paul(a)hovnanian.com> wrote:
>
>>Jim Thompson wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:28:57 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
>>> <Paul(a)Hovnanian.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I found my old HP-41C curve fit program card. Then I found my old
>>>>HP-41C.
>>>>
>>>>The model I get from your curve is:
>>>>
>>>>.MODEL MyWhiteLED D
>>>>+ IS = 4.4249E-9
>>>>+ N = 8.3923
>>>>+ RS = 7.7980
>>>>
>>>>No subcircuits required.
>>>
>>> BTW: "your curve"? Whose curve? You clip too much, Paul.
>>
>>Sorry. I took your spice model from your post, ran it for 70 current
>>points and poked every tenth one into my program. I didn't have the table
>>function values (the PDF you posted in a.b.s.e which I assume were your
>>original measured data points). By the way, there appears to be an
>>outlying data point in your graph.
>>
>>So I was actually curve fitting to your curve fit.
>
> I finally figured that out ;-) I first thought someone I had filtered
> out, like from googlegroups, had posted some data ;-)
>
> The "outlying data point" is an unknown, so PSpice stops and _holds_
> at the last PWL data point.

Evidently the PSpice people haven't learned anything about dry-labbing and
tossing undesirable data points out from the climatologists. ;-)

--
Paul Hovnanian paul(a)hovnanian.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have gnu, will travel.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Problem with LM3150
Next: 9v UNregulated PSU