Who is really the 'personality' that calls himself 'Inertial' ??!!
in [Relativity]
|
From: Inertial on 10 Jun 2010 07:55 "Jeroen Belleman" <jeroen(a)nospam.please> wrote in message news:huqjlv$llu$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... > Inertial wrote: >> "Jeroen Belleman" <jeroen(a)nospam.please> wrote in message >> news:huqc9b$b90$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... >>> Inertial wrote: >>>> I don't need any help. You [Y.P.] do, but refuse to learn. That's >>>> your problem .. but the rest of us have to suffer through your >>>> ignorance and stupidity. >>> >>> We'd suffer less if you'd just give up. Unless you're enjoying >>> yourself, of course. Why do you keep arguing so fervently, even >>> though you know you'll never be getting anywhere? >> >> Because I like the truth to be out there .. if feel a duty to those who >> read these threads. And maybe .. just maybe .. he might one day surprise >> us and start to see where he is going wrong and understand. > > You are entitled to your feelings. However, in my honest opinion, I do > not think you are doing sci.physics a service. I do not believe that > you will succeed to convince him. For anyone so inclined, the concepts > discussed are easy enough to come by, but none so blind as those who > will not see. True .. prob shouldn't go to the sci.physics and sci.physics.particle. .. but Porat loves to cross post his hatred. if I take them off my replyies he yells insults and says I'm cheating and depriving his readers and puts the same groups (if not more) back on again.
From: Y.Porat on 10 Jun 2010 07:59 On Jun 10, 1:52 pm, Jeroen Belleman <jer...(a)nospam.please> wrote: > Inertial wrote: > > "Jeroen Belleman" <jer...(a)nospam.please> wrote in message > >news:huqc9b$b90$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... > >> Inertial wrote: > >>> I don't need any help. You [Y.P.] do, but refuse to learn. That's your > >>> problem .. but the rest of us have to suffer through your ignorance > >>> and stupidity. > > >> We'd suffer less if you'd just give up. Unless you're enjoying > >> yourself, of course. Why do you keep arguing so fervently, even > >> though you know you'll never be getting anywhere? > > > Because I like the truth to be out there .. if feel a duty to those who > > read these threads. And maybe .. just maybe .. he might one day > > surprise us and start to see where he is going wrong and understand. > > You are entitled to your feelings. However, in my honest opinion, I do > not think you are doing sci.physics a service. I do not believe that > you will succeed to convince him. For anyone so inclined, the concepts > discussed are easy enough to come by, but none so blind as those who > will not see. > > Jeroen Belleman ------------------------ MR belleman BTW are you a physicist ??) inertial admitted that the dimensions of photon momentum are M L/C soof course just those dinensions cannot describe and define the photon momentum there must be some scalar figures that are attached to it!! now according to you what is that L/C stand for - in that formula (of photon momentum ???) TIA Y.Porat --------------------------
From: Inertial on 10 Jun 2010 08:26 "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:43464268-0cac-4e45-9f91-0becac7795c5(a)d37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 10, 1:52 pm, Jeroen Belleman <jer...(a)nospam.please> wrote: >> Inertial wrote: >> > "Jeroen Belleman" <jer...(a)nospam.please> wrote in message >> >news:huqc9b$b90$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... >> >> Inertial wrote: >> >>> I don't need any help. You [Y.P.] do, but refuse to learn. That's >> >>> your >> >>> problem .. but the rest of us have to suffer through your ignorance >> >>> and stupidity. >> >> >> We'd suffer less if you'd just give up. Unless you're enjoying >> >> yourself, of course. Why do you keep arguing so fervently, even >> >> though you know you'll never be getting anywhere? >> >> > Because I like the truth to be out there .. if feel a duty to those who >> > read these threads. And maybe .. just maybe .. he might one day >> > surprise us and start to see where he is going wrong and understand. >> >> You are entitled to your feelings. However, in my honest opinion, I do >> not think you are doing sci.physics a service. I do not believe that >> you will succeed to convince him. For anyone so inclined, the concepts >> discussed are easy enough to come by, but none so blind as those who >> will not see. >> >> Jeroen Belleman > > ------------------------ > MR belleman > BTW are you a physicist ??) > inertial admitted that > the dimensions of photon momentum are > > M L/C No. I did not. I said very clearly they were ML/T. Don't lie about what I say. There was no 'admission' .. ML/T is what the dimensions of any momentum are and always have been. P = h / lamda is perfectly correct as far as dimension go. > soof course just those dinensions > cannot describe and define the > photon momentum P = h / lambda gives you the momentum with the correct dimensions and numerical value > there must be some > scalar figures that are attached to it!! P, h , and lambda are ALL scalars. They each have a numerical value and dimensions. Depending on you units of measure and what EMR you are talking about, you get difference values for photon momentum > now > according to you > what is that L/C stand for - in that formula There is no L/C in the formula. There is h/lambda. And that has units of ML/T. Try to keep up > (of photon momentum ???)
From: Y.Porat on 10 Jun 2010 08:38 On Jun 10, 2:26 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:43464268-0cac-4e45-9f91-0becac7795c5(a)d37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > > > > > On Jun 10, 1:52 pm, Jeroen Belleman <jer...(a)nospam.please> wrote: > >> Inertial wrote: > >> > "Jeroen Belleman" <jer...(a)nospam.please> wrote in message > >> >news:huqc9b$b90$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... > >> >> Inertial wrote: > >> >>> I don't need any help. You [Y.P.] do, but refuse to learn. That's > >> >>> your > >> >>> problem .. but the rest of us have to suffer through your ignorance > >> >>> and stupidity. > > >> >> We'd suffer less if you'd just give up. Unless you're enjoying > >> >> yourself, of course. Why do you keep arguing so fervently, even > >> >> though you know you'll never be getting anywhere? > > >> > Because I like the truth to be out there .. if feel a duty to those who > >> > read these threads. And maybe .. just maybe .. he might one day > >> > surprise us and start to see where he is going wrong and understand. > > >> You are entitled to your feelings. However, in my honest opinion, I do > >> not think you are doing sci.physics a service. I do not believe that > >> you will succeed to convince him. For anyone so inclined, the concepts > >> discussed are easy enough to come by, but none so blind as those who > >> will not see. > > >> Jeroen Belleman > > > ------------------------ > > MR belleman > > BTW are you a physicist ??) > > inertial admitted that > > the dimensions of photon momentum are > > > M L/C > > No. I did not. I said very clearly they were ML/T. Don't lie about what I > say. > > There was no 'admission' .. ML/T is what the dimensions of any momentum are > and always have been. P = h / lamda is perfectly correct as far as > dimension go. > > > soof course just those dinensions > > cannot describe and define the > > photon momentum > > P = h / lambda gives you the momentum with the correct dimensions and > numerical value > > > there must be some > > scalar figures that are attached to it!! > > P, h , and lambda are ALL scalars. They each have a numerical value and > dimensions. Depending on you units of measure and what EMR you are talking > about, you get difference values for photon momentum > > > now > > according to you > > what is that L/C stand for - in that formula > > There is no L/C in the formula. There is h/lambda. And that has units of > ML/T. Try to keep up > > > (of photon momentum ???) ------------------- next !! enough is enough with that psychopath pig imbecile donkey now i wait for Human being PHYSICISTS to get in that discussion !! and to make some advance in physics !! TIA Y.Porat -------------------
From: Inertial on 10 Jun 2010 08:41
"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:cb1657f8-038f-4475-9f9a-094af33129b1(a)x27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 10, 2:26 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:43464268-0cac-4e45-9f91-0becac7795c5(a)d37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> > On Jun 10, 1:52 pm, Jeroen Belleman <jer...(a)nospam.please> wrote: >> >> Inertial wrote: >> >> > "Jeroen Belleman" <jer...(a)nospam.please> wrote in message >> >> >news:huqc9b$b90$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... >> >> >> Inertial wrote: >> >> >>> I don't need any help. You [Y.P.] do, but refuse to learn. >> >> >>> That's >> >> >>> your >> >> >>> problem .. but the rest of us have to suffer through your >> >> >>> ignorance >> >> >>> and stupidity. >> >> >> >> We'd suffer less if you'd just give up. Unless you're enjoying >> >> >> yourself, of course. Why do you keep arguing so fervently, even >> >> >> though you know you'll never be getting anywhere? >> >> >> > Because I like the truth to be out there .. if feel a duty to those >> >> > who >> >> > read these threads. And maybe .. just maybe .. he might one day >> >> > surprise us and start to see where he is going wrong and understand. >> >> >> You are entitled to your feelings. However, in my honest opinion, I do >> >> not think you are doing sci.physics a service. I do not believe that >> >> you will succeed to convince him. For anyone so inclined, the concepts >> >> discussed are easy enough to come by, but none so blind as those who >> >> will not see. >> >> >> Jeroen Belleman >> >> > ------------------------ >> > MR belleman >> > BTW are you a physicist ??) >> > inertial admitted that >> > the dimensions of photon momentum are >> >> > M L/C >> >> No. I did not. I said very clearly they were ML/T. Don't lie about >> what I >> say. >> >> There was no 'admission' .. ML/T is what the dimensions of any momentum >> are >> and always have been. P = h / lamda is perfectly correct as far as >> dimension go. >> >> > soof course just those dinensions >> > cannot describe and define the >> > photon momentum >> >> P = h / lambda gives you the momentum with the correct dimensions and >> numerical value >> >> > there must be some >> > scalar figures that are attached to it!! >> >> P, h , and lambda are ALL scalars. They each have a numerical value and >> dimensions. Depending on you units of measure and what EMR you are >> talking >> about, you get difference values for photon momentum >> >> > now >> > according to you >> > what is that L/C stand for - in that formula >> >> There is no L/C in the formula. There is h/lambda. And that has units of >> ML/T. Try to keep up >> >> > (of photon momentum ???) > > ------------------- > next !! So you run away rather than learning. And let me guess. . you'll thro another barrage of foul mouthed insults as you run and hide > enough is enough with that psychopath pig > imbecile donkey Yeup > now i wait for Human being PHYSICISTS > to get in that discussion !! > and to make some advance in physics !! You will NEVER make an advance because you are too ignorant and unwillling to learn or think. What a waste of a brain. Just hurry up and die, because you are of no use to anyone as you are. Just a sad excuse for what used to be a human being. |