From: Y.Porat on 13 Jun 2010 04:31 On Jun 13, 6:17 am, "Inertial" finite etc > > > !!!WHILE YOU HAVE NO > > MATHEMATICAL TOOL > > TO PROVE IT ??!! > > But we do .. sorry, you are simply wrong on this > > > (iow > > you cant use it by the gamma factor > > that by definition does not work at that point > > But it doesn't "not work" by definition at that point. ------------------ Letys do it again: take 1/ (1- V/C (YOU CANCALLIT AS YOU LIKE IT THE NAME DOES NOT MATTER if v=c you get 1/ 0 infinity -so undefined !!! you cant multiply in a physics formula anything by infinity !! because it is out of your control !!! IT IS UNDEFINED SITUATION PHYSICALLY physics is not just mathematics in physics there are limits of validation so you cant say that while v=c the mass becomes infinity because YOU CANT PROVE THAT SITUATION not theoretically (what is infinite mass??) nor experimentally !!! because you can only say that with** current tools ERROR MARGINS we can prove it is found or not you have to say THE WHOLE TRUTH NOT A PARTIAL TRUTH 'themass of the photon' WHAT IS THE MASS OF A PHOTON WHAT SIZE OF A PHOTON?? ddi you ever cheked experimentally the smallest one?? ddi you ever checked experimentally the biggest one?? while actually you never chen its mass you check its energy !! 2 you aid above that actually we have not only M K S but M m K S while M is relativistic mass and m is the ordinary mass ??? can you show us were else it is presented that way ?? -------------- i snip parts but wil l come to them later because your system of obfuscation is piling a lot of issues and i prefer to deal with them one by one dont worry- (:-) later we will come to the other issues are you against it ?? btw what business do you have in Australia while you presented yourself as Artful ?? TIA Y.Porat --------------------------- |