Win32/RAMNIT.A Anyone?
in [Viruses]
|
From: John Slade on 4 Aug 2010 15:17 On 8/2/2010 11:27 AM, Dustin wrote: > John Slade<hhitman86(a)pacbell.net> wrote in > news:8ND5o.33941$o27.31443(a)newsfe08.iad: > >> On 8/1/2010 6:57 PM, FromTheRafters wrote: >>> "John Slade"<hhitman86(a)pacbell.net> wrote in message >>> news:Xyo5o.41721$OU6.25986(a)newsfe20.iad... >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>>>> I don't know why you would find it funny because a virus writer >>>>>> will use anything to hide a virus. What smarter way is to hide >>>>>> them in each and every folder in "system volume information"? >>> >>>> I didn't know Dustin Cook existed until he responded for you. >>>> But I've >>>> been reading some in alt.comp.viruses and I find it >>>> well...interesting... If he wrote viruses then he more than anyone >>>> should know that what I said happened is indeed possible. >>> >>> Because he understands true viruses, he knows that they don't need >>> to hide themselves in folders. >>> >>> I don't think he would have said what he said if you had said >>> worms, or malware, instead of viruses. >> >> Well "virus" is a generic term these days. I was talking >> about worms and/or trojans, I was using "virus" as a generic >> term. I guess that clears it up. > > virus isn't a generic term, then or now. As a professional, I think it > unwise of you to generalize what might be ailing the patient. > "Virus" is both a generic term and a specific term. Why do you think they call the software used to clean trojans and worms, "Anti-Virus" software? I'm sure you don't think that they only clean viruses and leave trojans and worms alone. It's all a matter of semantics. Just about all of the major anti-malware vendors have products that they call Anti-Virus. This is because it just stuck. You're a professional and you don't know this? John
From: John Slade on 4 Aug 2010 15:18 On 8/2/2010 11:57 AM, David H. Lipman wrote: > From: "John Slade"<hhitman86(a)pacbell.net> > > | On 8/1/2010 6:57 PM, FromTheRafters wrote: >>> "John Slade"<hhitman86(a)pacbell.net> wrote in message >>> news:Xyo5o.41721$OU6.25986(a)newsfe20.iad... > >>> [...] > >>>>>> I don't know why you would find it funny because a virus writer will use >>>>>> anything to hide a virus. What smarter way is to hide them in each and >>>>>> every folder in "system volume information"? > >>>> I didn't know Dustin Cook existed until he responded for you. But I've >>>> been reading some in alt.comp.viruses and I find it well...interesting... >>>> If he wrote viruses then he more than anyone should know that what I said >>>> happened is indeed possible. > >>> Because he understands true viruses, he knows that they don't need to hide >>> themselves in folders. > >>> I don't think he would have said what he said if you had said worms, or >>> malware, instead of viruses. > > | Well "virus" is a generic term these days. I was talking > | about worms and/or trojans, I was using "virus" as a generic > | term. I guess that clears it up. > > The term "malware" is generic. > The term "virus" is quite specific. > > "Virus" is both a generic term and a specific term. Why do you think they call the software used to clean trojans and worms, "Anti-Virus" software? I'm sure you don't think that they only clean viruses and leave trojans and worms alone. It's all a matter of semantics. Just about all of the major anti-malware vendors have products that they call Anti-Virus. This is because it just stuck. You're a professional and you don't know this? John
From: John Slade on 4 Aug 2010 15:20 On 8/2/2010 2:46 PM, FromTheRafters wrote: > "John Slade"<hhitman86(a)pacbell.net> wrote in message > news:8ND5o.33941$o27.31443(a)newsfe08.iad... >> On 8/1/2010 6:57 PM, FromTheRafters wrote: >>> "John Slade"<hhitman86(a)pacbell.net> wrote in message >>> news:Xyo5o.41721$OU6.25986(a)newsfe20.iad... >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>>>> I don't know why you would find it funny because a virus writer >>>>>> will use >>>>>> anything to hide a virus. What smarter way is to hide them in each >>>>>> and >>>>>> every folder in "system volume information"? >>> >>>> I didn't know Dustin Cook existed until he responded for you. >>>> But I've >>>> been reading some in alt.comp.viruses and I find it >>>> well...interesting... >>>> If he wrote viruses then he more than anyone should know that what I >>>> said >>>> happened is indeed possible. >>> >>> Because he understands true viruses, he knows that they don't need to >>> hide >>> themselves in folders. >>> >>> I don't think he would have said what he said if you had said worms, >>> or >>> malware, instead of viruses. >> >> Well "virus" is a generic term these days. I was talking about >> worms and/or trojans, I was using "virus" as a generic term. I guess >> that clears it up. > > Yep, clear as rain. You don't know the terminology, don't care, yet we > are supposed to believe that you know what you are talking about. > > That's it, huh? > > "Virus" is both a generic term and a specific term. Why do you think they call the software used to clean trojans and worms, "Anti-Virus" software? I'm sure you don't think that they only clean viruses and leave trojans and worms alone. It's all a matter of semantics. Just about all of the major anti-malware vendors have products that they call Anti-Virus. This is because it just stuck. You're a professional and you don't know this? I know exactly what I'm talking about. So tell me what tools do you use to remove worms and trojans from computers? Are any of them called "Anti-Virus" software? I also know that words can have dual meanings. John
From: David H. Lipman on 4 Aug 2010 16:53 From: "John Slade" <hhitman86(a)pacbell.net> >> The term "malware" is generic. >> The term "virus" is quite specific. | "Virus" is both a generic term and a specific term. Why do | you think they call the software used to clean trojans and | worms, "Anti-Virus" software? I'm sure you don't think that they | only clean viruses and leave trojans and worms alone. It's all a | matter of semantics. Just about all of the major anti-malware | vendors have products that they call Anti-Virus. This is because | it just stuck. You're a professional and you don't know this? Sorry John - No. Virus is specific and is INCORRECTLY used way too often. That's what the term malwrae is for. The reason they call anti virus software that is due to its legacy. At one time there were only viruses. Anyone who calls any/all malicious software a virus without specifically knowing what it is is just plain wrong. -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
From: FromTheRafters on 4 Aug 2010 17:40
"John Slade" <hhitman86(a)pacbell.net> wrote in message news:G1j6o.53362$dx7.3611(a)newsfe21.iad... [...] > "Virus" is both a generic term and a specific term. > Why do you think they call the software used to clean > trojans and worms, "Anti-Virus" software? Generally, they call it antimalware unless it is also effective against viruses and worms (which are self-replicators). If it is effective against viruses, they call it an antivirus. Antivirus programs can also detect some non-replicating malware. > I'm sure you don't think that they only clean viruses > and leave trojans and worms alone. It's all a matter > of semantics. Of course it is, but semantics shouldn't be a dismissive word. The meanings of words are *important* to effective communications. > Just about all of the major anti-malware vendors have > products that they call Anti-Virus. This is because it just > stuck. You're a professional and you don't know this? We all know this, and we don't like it one bit. The fact remains that viruses are a special case requiring more than what many antimalware applications are equipped to handle. |