Windows Vista Performance Codes in Event Viewer for one
in [64 Bits Windows]
|
From: Suzanne MarcAurele on 27 Nov 2007 21:05 I have a client that bought an AMD 64bit processor system that in my estimation is an absolute dawg! I have received several error codes throughout all of the event viewers, in particular critical codes related to the kernel and performance(the logs for a similiar period in a clean install of Vista are 2x larger than the clean install). I also discovered an additional administrator in Group Policy that I find no where in my installation of Vista 32 bit. Is it possible that on consumer machines that manufacturers are installing an administrator - the GP even states that the system is shared when it is not. Additionally the system crashed totally - it was in the restore from the manufacturer's disk that this double admin came up - ie after I created an administrator it still persists to show that the policy will be updated for this account - could the built in account be active? It is a first for me encountering a machine that has so many errors - my 32 bit gets a rating of 4.6 and the client's 64 bit gets a 2.6!!!! I need some answers here but more importantly Microsoft needs to do an article running down the meaning of these error codes - be nice to have a class id listing - it took me about 40 hours to pour over the various event logs to determine how Vista works - my time would have been cut in more than half if there were a reference that really covers what's inside. Sorry there is so much here and yet so little but I want to go back to the client with an intelligent answer beyond you had this error and that error - ie I want to be able to say with some certainty that they ought to go back to the manufacturer and demand they take back the system. -- SuzDPQ
From: Charlie Russel - MVP on 28 Nov 2007 00:43 I'm sorry, but there's really nothing in this that tells any of us what you have or what the issue might be. Clearly many, many of us have been running 64bit Vista without the issues you appear to be describing. You say that there's an extra administrator account - but don't tell us the account name. It's apparently an OEM install, but you don't say what OEM or what other software the OEM install puts on the machine. I built the machine I'm using myself. It has an AMD processor, an Opteron 185 - a mid-range chip even when I bought it, and by now a quite old and slow one. It has an old (and not exactly high end) VIA chipset. And a low end ATI graphics card in an AGP slot. And 3 GB of RAM. The machine is fast, it has exactly the accounts on it I expect (Administrator, Guest, Charlie) plus the domain accounts that access it. -- Charlie. http://msmvps.com/xperts64 http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel "Suzanne MarcAurele" <smarcaur(a)optonline.net(donotspam)> wrote in message news:D90ADCE9-21E1-470E-985B-FC8CBF7A4875(a)microsoft.com... >I have a client that bought an AMD 64bit processor system that in my > estimation is an absolute dawg! I have received several error codes > throughout all of the event viewers, in particular critical codes related > to > the kernel and performance(the logs for a similiar period in a clean > install > of Vista are 2x larger than the clean install). I also discovered an > additional administrator in Group Policy that I find no where in my > installation of Vista 32 bit. Is it possible that on consumer machines > that > manufacturers are installing an administrator - the GP even states that > the > system is shared when it is not. Additionally the system crashed > totally - > it was in the restore from the manufacturer's disk that this double admin > came up - ie after I created an administrator it still persists to show > that > the policy will be updated for this account - could the built in account > be > active? It is a first for me encountering a machine that has so many > errors > - my 32 bit gets a rating of 4.6 and the client's 64 bit gets a 2.6!!!! I > need some answers here but more importantly Microsoft needs to do an > article > running down the meaning of these error codes - be nice to have a class id > listing - it took me about 40 hours to pour over the various event logs to > determine how Vista works - my time would have been cut in more than half > if > there were a reference that really covers what's inside. > > Sorry there is so much here and yet so little but I want to go back to the > client with an intelligent answer beyond you had this error and that > error - > ie I want to be able to say with some certainty that they ought to go back > to > the manufacturer and demand they take back the system. > -- > SuzDPQ
From: Carlos on 28 Nov 2007 07:13 Charlie, New VIA drivers released yesterday for Vista x64: http://www.viaarena.com/default.aspx?PageID=420&OSID=37&CatID=3180 :) Carlos "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote: > I'm sorry, but there's really nothing in this that tells any of us what you > have or what the issue might be. Clearly many, many of us have been running > 64bit Vista without the issues you appear to be describing. You say that > there's an extra administrator account - but don't tell us the account name. > It's apparently an OEM install, but you don't say what OEM or what other > software the OEM install puts on the machine. > > I built the machine I'm using myself. It has an AMD processor, an Opteron > 185 - a mid-range chip even when I bought it, and by now a quite old and > slow one. It has an old (and not exactly high end) VIA chipset. And a low > end ATI graphics card in an AGP slot. And 3 GB of RAM. The machine is fast, > it has exactly the accounts on it I expect (Administrator, Guest, Charlie) > plus the domain accounts that access it. > > -- > Charlie. > http://msmvps.com/xperts64 > http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel > > > "Suzanne MarcAurele" <smarcaur(a)optonline.net(donotspam)> wrote in message > news:D90ADCE9-21E1-470E-985B-FC8CBF7A4875(a)microsoft.com... > >I have a client that bought an AMD 64bit processor system that in my > > estimation is an absolute dawg! I have received several error codes > > throughout all of the event viewers, in particular critical codes related > > to > > the kernel and performance(the logs for a similiar period in a clean > > install > > of Vista are 2x larger than the clean install). I also discovered an > > additional administrator in Group Policy that I find no where in my > > installation of Vista 32 bit. Is it possible that on consumer machines > > that > > manufacturers are installing an administrator - the GP even states that > > the > > system is shared when it is not. Additionally the system crashed > > totally - > > it was in the restore from the manufacturer's disk that this double admin > > came up - ie after I created an administrator it still persists to show > > that > > the policy will be updated for this account - could the built in account > > be > > active? It is a first for me encountering a machine that has so many > > errors > > - my 32 bit gets a rating of 4.6 and the client's 64 bit gets a 2.6!!!! I > > need some answers here but more importantly Microsoft needs to do an > > article > > running down the meaning of these error codes - be nice to have a class id > > listing - it took me about 40 hours to pour over the various event logs to > > determine how Vista works - my time would have been cut in more than half > > if > > there were a reference that really covers what's inside. > > > > Sorry there is so much here and yet so little but I want to go back to the > > client with an intelligent answer beyond you had this error and that > > error - > > ie I want to be able to say with some certainty that they ought to go back > > to > > the manufacturer and demand they take back the system. > > -- > > SuzDPQ >
From: Suzanne MarcAurele on 28 Nov 2007 16:08 -- SuzDPQ "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote: > I'm sorry, but there's really nothing in this that tells any of us what you > have or what the issue might be. Clearly many, many of us have been running > 64bit Vista without the issues you appear to be describing. You say that > there's an extra administrator account - but don't tell us the account name. > It's apparently an OEM install, but you don't say what OEM or what other > software the OEM install puts on the machine. > > I built the machine I'm using myself. It has an AMD processor, an Opteron > 185 - a mid-range chip even when I bought it, and by now a quite old and > slow one. It has an old (and not exactly high end) VIA chipset. And a low > end ATI graphics card in an AGP slot. And 3 GB of RAM. The machine is fast, > it has exactly the accounts on it I expect (Administrator, Guest, Charlie) > plus the domain accounts that access it. > > -- > Charlie. > http://msmvps.com/xperts64 > http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel > > > "Suzanne MarcAurele" <smarcaur(a)optonline.net(donotspam)> wrote in message > news:D90ADCE9-21E1-470E-985B-FC8CBF7A4875(a)microsoft.com... > >I have a client that bought an AMD 64bit processor system that in my > > estimation is an absolute dawg! I have received several error codes > > throughout all of the event viewers, in particular critical codes related > > to > > the kernel and performance(the logs for a similiar period in a clean > > install > > of Vista are 2x larger than the clean install). I also discovered an > > additional administrator in Group Policy that I find no where in my > > installation of Vista 32 bit. Is it possible that on consumer machines > > that > > manufacturers are installing an administrator - the GP even states that > > the > > system is shared when it is not. Additionally the system crashed > > totally - > > it was in the restore from the manufacturer's disk that this double admin > > came up - ie after I created an administrator it still persists to show > > that > > the policy will be updated for this account - could the built in account > > be > > active? It is a first for me encountering a machine that has so many > > errors > > - my 32 bit gets a rating of 4.6 and the client's 64 bit gets a 2.6!!!! I > > need some answers here but more importantly Microsoft needs to do an > > article > > running down the meaning of these error codes - be nice to have a class id > > listing - it took me about 40 hours to pour over the various event logs to > > determine how Vista works - my time would have been cut in more than half > > if > > there were a reference that really covers what's inside. > > > > Sorry there is so much here and yet so little but I want to go back to the > > client with an intelligent answer beyond you had this error and that > > error - > > ie I want to be able to say with some certainty that they ought to go back > > to > > the manufacturer and demand they take back the system. > > -- > > SuzDPQ > Here are some of the error codes with 45000 events logged, several functional it was not a matter of detail, neither do I need URL's to drivers - by the way MCSE, CCNA: Next policy processing for WORKGROUP\3DBGASFRNPUR0$ will be attempted in 118 minutes. error 500 & 501 -points to CPU resources over utilized Diagnostic module {A59F0643-A6CA-48E0-A7C4-4CDD258439E2} (%SystemRoot%\system32\diagperf.dll) encountered an error while handling scenario {FFC42108-4920-4ACF-A4FC-8ABDCC68ADA4}, instance {7BFCB492-5B6D-436F-BB89-8AC0B38AA512}, original activity ID {00000030-0000-0000-5915-EF3A101FC801}. The error code was -2147024883. Diagnostic module {C0F51D84-11B9-4E74-B083-99F11BA2DB0A} (%windir%\system32\radardt.dll) encountered an error while handling scenario {739FF6CF-5033-428C-9E2F-582096482DD5}, instance {B2E76D56-22D4-4630-B1EB-91960393102D}, original activity ID {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}. The error code was -2147467259 Diagnostic module {15FBA3B8-A37A-4F91-BDBA-FBB98FE804BF} (%SystemRoot%\system32\diagperf.dll) encountered an error while handling scenario {2698178D-FDAD-40AE-9D3C-1371703ADC5B}, instance {17A588FE-D17F-4BF1-9ECA-A6046B9306FD}, original activity ID {2698178D-FDAD-40AE-9D3C-1371703ADC5B}. The error code was -2057957370. Diagnostic module {A59F0643-A6CA-48E0-A7C4-4CDD258439E2} (%SystemRoot%\system32\diagperf.dll) encountered an error while handling scenario {FFC42108-4920-4ACF-A4FC-8ABDCC68ADA4}, instance {A1F5A529-A1EE-4B01-AA9F-1F3D5FB65753}, original activity ID {00000030-0000-0000-429F-E602D102C801}. The error code was -2147024883. Diagnostic module {282396B2-6C46-4D66-B413-70B0445DF33C} (%SystemRoot%\system32\diagperf.dll) encountered an error while handling scenario {A7A5847A-7511-4E4E-90B1-45AD2A002F51}, instance {49959AAD-7461-49D9-A9DF-198B986EC7B8}, original activity ID {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}. The error code was -2147024735. 2147943645 Internet misspelled for Internet Service Offers - that repeated program Intenet #200 The last one is a no brainer and the others proved uphelpful when doing a find in the registry, the first list's the admin account, If you can help with some concrete answers - ie where to find the error code and class id listings for Vista it would bewelcome
From: Charlie Russel - MVP on 28 Nov 2007 16:22 What OEM? What software is included in that OEM? What account is being created? From the errors you're reporting, I'd vote for corruption of something. And I'd be very inclined to start the troubleshooting by installing a retail, known good, copy of Vista from original DVDs. (Do a PIDless install - this is just for test.) If you're still seeing major problems, then look at the hardware. If the install is clean - then it's time to have a discussion with the OEM about a corrupted install or what they're doing. -- Charlie. http://msmvps.com/xperts64 http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel "Suzanne MarcAurele" <smarcaur(a)optonline.net(donotspam)> wrote in message news:DB266B8D-AB0B-4528-8FDB-30CC3A8A8E07(a)microsoft.com... > > -- > SuzDPQ > > > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote: > >> I'm sorry, but there's really nothing in this that tells any of us what >> you >> have or what the issue might be. Clearly many, many of us have been >> running >> 64bit Vista without the issues you appear to be describing. You say that >> there's an extra administrator account - but don't tell us the account >> name. >> It's apparently an OEM install, but you don't say what OEM or what other >> software the OEM install puts on the machine. >> >> I built the machine I'm using myself. It has an AMD processor, an Opteron >> 185 - a mid-range chip even when I bought it, and by now a quite old and >> slow one. It has an old (and not exactly high end) VIA chipset. And a low >> end ATI graphics card in an AGP slot. And 3 GB of RAM. The machine is >> fast, >> it has exactly the accounts on it I expect (Administrator, Guest, >> Charlie) >> plus the domain accounts that access it. >> >> -- >> Charlie. >> http://msmvps.com/xperts64 >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel >> >> >> "Suzanne MarcAurele" <smarcaur(a)optonline.net(donotspam)> wrote in message >> news:D90ADCE9-21E1-470E-985B-FC8CBF7A4875(a)microsoft.com... >> >I have a client that bought an AMD 64bit processor system that in my >> > estimation is an absolute dawg! I have received several error codes >> > throughout all of the event viewers, in particular critical codes >> > related >> > to >> > the kernel and performance(the logs for a similiar period in a clean >> > install >> > of Vista are 2x larger than the clean install). I also discovered an >> > additional administrator in Group Policy that I find no where in my >> > installation of Vista 32 bit. Is it possible that on consumer machines >> > that >> > manufacturers are installing an administrator - the GP even states that >> > the >> > system is shared when it is not. Additionally the system crashed >> > totally - >> > it was in the restore from the manufacturer's disk that this double >> > admin >> > came up - ie after I created an administrator it still persists to show >> > that >> > the policy will be updated for this account - could the built in >> > account >> > be >> > active? It is a first for me encountering a machine that has so many >> > errors >> > - my 32 bit gets a rating of 4.6 and the client's 64 bit gets a 2.6!!!! >> > I >> > need some answers here but more importantly Microsoft needs to do an >> > article >> > running down the meaning of these error codes - be nice to have a class >> > id >> > listing - it took me about 40 hours to pour over the various event logs >> > to >> > determine how Vista works - my time would have been cut in more than >> > half >> > if >> > there were a reference that really covers what's inside. >> > >> > Sorry there is so much here and yet so little but I want to go back to >> > the >> > client with an intelligent answer beyond you had this error and that >> > error - >> > ie I want to be able to say with some certainty that they ought to go >> > back >> > to >> > the manufacturer and demand they take back the system. >> > -- >> > SuzDPQ >> > Here are some of the error codes with 45000 events logged, several > functional it was not a matter of detail, neither do I need URL's to > drivers > - by the way MCSE, CCNA: > > Next policy processing for WORKGROUP\3DBGASFRNPUR0$ will be attempted in > 118 > minutes. > error 500 & 501 -points to CPU resources over utilized > Diagnostic module {A59F0643-A6CA-48E0-A7C4-4CDD258439E2} > (%SystemRoot%\system32\diagperf.dll) encountered an error while handling > scenario {FFC42108-4920-4ACF-A4FC-8ABDCC68ADA4}, instance > {7BFCB492-5B6D-436F-BB89-8AC0B38AA512}, original activity ID > {00000030-0000-0000-5915-EF3A101FC801}. The error code was -2147024883. > Diagnostic module {C0F51D84-11B9-4E74-B083-99F11BA2DB0A} > (%windir%\system32\radardt.dll) encountered an error while handling > scenario > {739FF6CF-5033-428C-9E2F-582096482DD5}, instance > {B2E76D56-22D4-4630-B1EB-91960393102D}, original activity ID > {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}. The error code was -2147467259 > Diagnostic module {15FBA3B8-A37A-4F91-BDBA-FBB98FE804BF} > (%SystemRoot%\system32\diagperf.dll) encountered an error while handling > scenario {2698178D-FDAD-40AE-9D3C-1371703ADC5B}, instance > {17A588FE-D17F-4BF1-9ECA-A6046B9306FD}, original activity ID > {2698178D-FDAD-40AE-9D3C-1371703ADC5B}. The error code was -2057957370. > Diagnostic module {A59F0643-A6CA-48E0-A7C4-4CDD258439E2} > (%SystemRoot%\system32\diagperf.dll) encountered an error while handling > scenario {FFC42108-4920-4ACF-A4FC-8ABDCC68ADA4}, instance > {A1F5A529-A1EE-4B01-AA9F-1F3D5FB65753}, original activity ID > {00000030-0000-0000-429F-E602D102C801}. The error code was -2147024883. > Diagnostic module {282396B2-6C46-4D66-B413-70B0445DF33C} > (%SystemRoot%\system32\diagperf.dll) encountered an error while handling > scenario {A7A5847A-7511-4E4E-90B1-45AD2A002F51}, instance > {49959AAD-7461-49D9-A9DF-198B986EC7B8}, original activity ID > {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}. The error code was -2147024735. > > > 2147943645 Internet misspelled for Internet Service Offers - that repeated > program > Intenet #200 > The last one is a no brainer and the others proved uphelpful when doing a > find in the registry, the first list's the admin account, If you can help > with some concrete answers - ie where to find the error code and class id > listings for Vista it would bewelcome >
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: chkdsk logs in Vista Next: Additional Drivers x64 drivers on x86 Print server ntprint.inf |