From: PD on
On Jan 15, 12:35 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Jan 7, 8:13 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > It seems so obvious to me I find it
> > almost unfathomable that it is
> > this difficult to get the concept across.
>
>   Keep on thinking for yourself instead of learning what other people
> teach and you will continue to discover concepts that no one else can
> understand.

This is sometimes known as psychosis.

>
>   Good for you and the rest of humanity despite their currant
> blindfolded mindset.
>
> glird

From: mpc755 on
On Jan 15, 4:21 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 12:35 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 7, 8:13 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > It seems so obvious to me I find it
> > > almost unfathomable that it is
> > > this difficult to get the concept across.
>
> >   Keep on thinking for yourself instead of learning what other people
> > teach and you will continue to discover concepts that no one else can
> > understand.
>
> This is sometimes known as psychosis.
>

In your model, you insist the boat creates the interference pattern on
the shore in and of itself. In your understanding of nature, you
insist the boat creates the interference pattern on the shore because
of the water. You refuse to change your model because you insist your
model accurately reflects nature.

This is the definition of psychosis.

Why is the particle always detected exiting a single slit?

Because the particle always exits a single slit.

In nature, the particle and its displacement wave behave as one.

>
>
> >   Good for you and the rest of humanity despite their currant
> > blindfolded mindset.
>
> > glird
>
>
From: mpc755 on
On Jan 15, 4:21 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 12:35 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 7, 8:13 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > It seems so obvious to me I find it
> > > almost unfathomable that it is
> > > this difficult to get the concept across.
>
> >   Keep on thinking for yourself instead of learning what other people
> > teach and you will continue to discover concepts that no one else can
> > understand.
>
> This is sometimes known as psychosis.
>

In your model, you insist the boat creates the interference pattern on
the shore in and of itself. In your understanding of nature, you
insist the boat creates the interference pattern on the shore because
of the water. You refuse to change your model because you insist your
model accurately reflects nature.

This is the definition of psychosis.

Why is the particle always detected exiting a single slit?

Because the particle always exits a single slit.

In nature, the particle and its aether displacement wave behave as
one.

>
>
> >   Good for you and the rest of humanity despite their currant
> > blindfolded mindset.
>
> > glird
>
>

From: mpc755 on
On Jan 15, 4:21 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 12:35 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 7, 8:13 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > It seems so obvious to me I find it
> > > almost unfathomable that it is
> > > this difficult to get the concept across.
>
> >   Keep on thinking for yourself instead of learning what other people
> > teach and you will continue to discover concepts that no one else can
> > understand.
>
> This is sometimes known as psychosis.
>

In your model, you insist the boat creates the interference pattern on
the shore in and of itself. In your understanding of nature, you
insist the boat creates the interference pattern on the shore because
of the water. You refuse to change your model because you insist your
model accurately reflects nature.

This is the definition of psychosis.

Why is the particle always detected exiting a single slit?

Because the particle always exits a single slit.

In nature, the particle and its aether displacement wave act as one.

>
>
> >   Good for you and the rest of humanity despite their currant
> > blindfolded mindset.
>
> > glird
>
>

From: PD on
On Jan 16, 8:29 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 4:21 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 15, 12:35 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 7, 8:13 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > It seems so obvious to me I find it
> > > > almost unfathomable that it is
> > > > this difficult to get the concept across.
>
> > >   Keep on thinking for yourself instead of learning what other people
> > > teach and you will continue to discover concepts that no one else can
> > > understand.
>
> > This is sometimes known as psychosis.
>
> In your model, you insist the boat creates the interference pattern on
> the shore in and of itself.

See there? Psychosis. You don't have the foggiest idea what I insisted
upon, so you make it up.

> In your understanding of nature, you
> insist the boat creates the interference pattern on the shore because
> of the water. You refuse to change your model because you insist your
> model accurately reflects nature.

The model that most accurately reflects nature wins. Yes. This is what
science is about.

>
> This is the definition of psychosis.

No, making the model that most accurately reflects nature the one that
is believed is called science, not psychosis. Making up stuff about
what I said is psychosis.

>
> Why is the particle always detected exiting a single slit?

Because that's what QM tells you particles will do.

>
> Because the particle always exits a single slit.

No, only when there's a detector there. When there isn't, it doesn't.

>
> In nature, the particle and its aether displacement wave act as one.
>
>
>
> > >   Good for you and the rest of humanity despite their currant
> > > blindfolded mindset.
>
> > > glird
>
>