Prev: The North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves
Next: Exactly why the theories of relativity are complete nonsense- the basic mistake exposed!
From: PD on 15 Jan 2010 16:21 On Jan 15, 12:35 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Jan 7, 8:13 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > It seems so obvious to me I find it > > almost unfathomable that it is > > this difficult to get the concept across. > > Keep on thinking for yourself instead of learning what other people > teach and you will continue to discover concepts that no one else can > understand. This is sometimes known as psychosis. > > Good for you and the rest of humanity despite their currant > blindfolded mindset. > > glird
From: mpc755 on 16 Jan 2010 18:46 On Jan 15, 4:21 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 15, 12:35 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 7, 8:13 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > It seems so obvious to me I find it > > > almost unfathomable that it is > > > this difficult to get the concept across. > > > Keep on thinking for yourself instead of learning what other people > > teach and you will continue to discover concepts that no one else can > > understand. > > This is sometimes known as psychosis. > In your model, you insist the boat creates the interference pattern on the shore in and of itself. In your understanding of nature, you insist the boat creates the interference pattern on the shore because of the water. You refuse to change your model because you insist your model accurately reflects nature. This is the definition of psychosis. Why is the particle always detected exiting a single slit? Because the particle always exits a single slit. In nature, the particle and its displacement wave behave as one. > > > > Good for you and the rest of humanity despite their currant > > blindfolded mindset. > > > glird > >
From: mpc755 on 16 Jan 2010 21:29 On Jan 15, 4:21 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 15, 12:35 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 7, 8:13 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > It seems so obvious to me I find it > > > almost unfathomable that it is > > > this difficult to get the concept across. > > > Keep on thinking for yourself instead of learning what other people > > teach and you will continue to discover concepts that no one else can > > understand. > > This is sometimes known as psychosis. > In your model, you insist the boat creates the interference pattern on the shore in and of itself. In your understanding of nature, you insist the boat creates the interference pattern on the shore because of the water. You refuse to change your model because you insist your model accurately reflects nature. This is the definition of psychosis. Why is the particle always detected exiting a single slit? Because the particle always exits a single slit. In nature, the particle and its aether displacement wave behave as one. > > > > Good for you and the rest of humanity despite their currant > > blindfolded mindset. > > > glird > >
From: mpc755 on 16 Jan 2010 21:29 On Jan 15, 4:21 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 15, 12:35 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 7, 8:13 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > It seems so obvious to me I find it > > > almost unfathomable that it is > > > this difficult to get the concept across. > > > Keep on thinking for yourself instead of learning what other people > > teach and you will continue to discover concepts that no one else can > > understand. > > This is sometimes known as psychosis. > In your model, you insist the boat creates the interference pattern on the shore in and of itself. In your understanding of nature, you insist the boat creates the interference pattern on the shore because of the water. You refuse to change your model because you insist your model accurately reflects nature. This is the definition of psychosis. Why is the particle always detected exiting a single slit? Because the particle always exits a single slit. In nature, the particle and its aether displacement wave act as one. > > > > Good for you and the rest of humanity despite their currant > > blindfolded mindset. > > > glird > >
From: PD on 16 Jan 2010 22:02
On Jan 16, 8:29 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 15, 4:21 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 15, 12:35 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > On Jan 7, 8:13 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > It seems so obvious to me I find it > > > > almost unfathomable that it is > > > > this difficult to get the concept across. > > > > Keep on thinking for yourself instead of learning what other people > > > teach and you will continue to discover concepts that no one else can > > > understand. > > > This is sometimes known as psychosis. > > In your model, you insist the boat creates the interference pattern on > the shore in and of itself. See there? Psychosis. You don't have the foggiest idea what I insisted upon, so you make it up. > In your understanding of nature, you > insist the boat creates the interference pattern on the shore because > of the water. You refuse to change your model because you insist your > model accurately reflects nature. The model that most accurately reflects nature wins. Yes. This is what science is about. > > This is the definition of psychosis. No, making the model that most accurately reflects nature the one that is believed is called science, not psychosis. Making up stuff about what I said is psychosis. > > Why is the particle always detected exiting a single slit? Because that's what QM tells you particles will do. > > Because the particle always exits a single slit. No, only when there's a detector there. When there isn't, it doesn't. > > In nature, the particle and its aether displacement wave act as one. > > > > > > Good for you and the rest of humanity despite their currant > > > blindfolded mindset. > > > > glird > > |