Working toward a world without nuclear weapons
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Quantum Gravity 399.97: Internality and Probable Correlation
Next: HERE is a list that contains ALL possible infinite sequences of digits
From: Sam Wormley on 2 Jul 2010 11:21 Working toward a world without nuclear weapons Limiting the number of warheads is a good beginning, but getting to the end state calls for new thinking. http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_63/iss_7/30_1.shtml?type=PTALERT&bypassSSO=1
From: Robert Higgins on 2 Jul 2010 11:46 On Jul 2, 11:21 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Working toward a world without nuclear weapons > > Limiting the number of warheads is a good beginning, but getting to the > end state calls for new thinking. > > http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_63/iss_7/30_1.shtm... Off topic for sci.physics. Nevertheless, a world without nuclear weapons would be a very bad world. Those who think otherwise really need to study history, and think much more carefully about it.
From: eric gisse on 2 Jul 2010 13:02 Sam Wormley wrote: > Working toward a world without nuclear weapons > > Limiting the number of warheads is a good beginning, but getting to the > end state calls for new thinking. > > http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD- ft/vol_63/iss_7/30_1.shtml?type=PTALERT&bypassSSO=1 I think a few hundred would be a nice number to settle upon.
From: G. L. Bradford on 3 Jul 2010 05:51
"Robert Higgins" <robert_higgins_61(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:53a9c0cf-b581-40cb-80ab-e78110f1a213(a)b6g2000vbr.googlegroups.com... On Jul 2, 11:21 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Working toward a world without nuclear weapons > > Limiting the number of warheads is a good beginning, but getting to the > end state calls for new thinking. > > http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_63/iss_7/30_1.shtm... Off topic for sci.physics. Nevertheless, a world without nuclear weapons would be a very bad world. Those who think otherwise really need to study history, and think much more carefully about it. ==================== A life that reaches the nuclear age down and in inevitably and imperatively needs a birth to the vastnesses of a Space Age up and out. It's like the infant in the womb world who has fully acquired vast and alien new dimensions of limbs, organs, energies, powers, reaches, needs and wants for which the womb world, its environment and governing agencies, is no longer dimensionally sufficient to provide for, confine, or contain without the most murderously deadly malignant consequences to the infant life and an expanding / growing youth that should have been (including the 'Old World', the home world, as then a newly youthful frontier (within the new youthful frontier) that also should have been). "Murderously deadly malignant consequences to the infant life": Sam and his kind are constantly calling for more and more controls over Man -- more and more tyrannies over Man, therefore in the backfire, for more and more all out wars against his Orwellian Big Brother State. We are a complex diverse higher life form species (as diverse and complex within our one species as all the rest of nature on Earth put together), there being many freedom loving humans, plenty enough of them more than willing to destroy this world if need be to rid themselves of Sam and his kind. YES, "those who think otherwise really need to study history," non-revisionist history, that is, "and think much more carefully about it." GLB ==================== |