Prev: deriving "elementary charge e" out of pure math; 1.618.. x 10^-19 C; magnetic monopole Chapt 14 #189; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: Numerical Ensemble of Harmonic Oscillators
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 22 Jun 2010 04:04
My oh my, the phi number is really turning up all over the place in
physics, like blue
bonnetts in an Onderdonck (spelling?) painting.

Since my last post I was wondering if it was consistent with other
numbers in physics.
Physicists rarely think like mathematicians as regards to consistency
as a means
of checking their work.

The Planck Length is another phi number or golden ratio number of 1.61
x 10^-32
meters. Now I wonder why no physicist ever noticed the plethora of
"phi numbers"
in physics? I seem to be the first in alot of things in science.

Now the Planck length of course has the speed of light included as

sqrt(hG/c^3)

But now, what I am concerned is to check my work of deriving the
elementary-charge
"e" out of pure math and to check it, it must be consistent with
Planck Length.

So basically, let me summarize what Elementary Charge means. It means
the smallest
size of a sphere or pseudosphere that either the proton or electron
can obtain. No electron
can be smaller than 10^-19 meters. That is the crux of the meaning of
charge. The smallest
size of either an Elliptic or Hyperbolic geometry is 10^-19 meters.

Now some would think that 10^-35 was the smallest size sphere or
pseudosphere to be
obtained, but no, the elementary charge says 10^-19 meters is the
smallest size sphere
or pseudosphere. Because in the derivation of the speed of light as
that of band meridians
divided by 1/8 log spiral is constrained to having 10^-19 meters the
smallest size to
accomodate band meridians and 1/8 log-spiral.

You see, if you had 10^-19 x 10^-19 you would have in band-meridians a
length of
beyond the Planck Length.

The Elementary Charge "e" is thus the smallest Elliptic or Hyperbolic
geometry
that fits consistent with Planck length and yet allows the speed of
light as
band meridians.

Now do not get me wrong. The basic issue with elementary charge is its
positive and negative characteristics. This is obtained by the fact
that charge
is either Elliptic geometry or Hyperbolic geometry. But the size
question is what
the Elementary Charge number is about. How big or how small can "e"
be.
And the answer is of the magnitude of order of 10^-19. The constraints
of the
exponent in "e" at 10^-19 are many constraints. It has to be 10^-19
not only
for the Planck length but if it were any larger say 10^-18, it would
mess up
with the proton diameter, neutron diameters and thus proton masses.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 22 Jun 2010 13:58



>
> The Planck Length is another phi number or golden ratio number of 1.61
> x 10^-32
> meters. Now I wonder why no physicist ever noticed the plethora of

Typing error, that should have read 10^-35 not 10^-32, and changed on
original
with a "sic" sign.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: deriving "elementary charge e" out of pure math; 1.618.. x 10^-19 C; magnetic monopole Chapt 14 #189; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: Numerical Ensemble of Harmonic Oscillators