From: Michael Sierchio on
Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:

> Hmm lessee now DVD-ROM at 16x rate is somewhere around 20MB/s
> whereas it's hard to get above about 8MB/s with PIO. Dropping to PIO will
> reduce throughput to any fast drive (by a factor of 2-3 not 10 for optical
> drives) but what is worse is that at maximum throughput it will use all
> available CPU in interrupt response.

You'll never see 20MB/s *throughput* from a DVD-ROM. Again, you're
conflating transfer rate and throughput.

I'm not suggesting that PIO is to be preferred, I was commenting
that the hyperbole in the post that prompted my response was
way out of line.

- M


From: Steve O'Hara-Smith on
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:58:22 -0700
Michael Sierchio <kudzu-usenet2(a)tenebras.com> wrote:

> Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
>
> > Hmm lessee now DVD-ROM at 16x rate is somewhere around 20MB/s
> > whereas it's hard to get above about 8MB/s with PIO. Dropping to PIO
> > will reduce throughput to any fast drive (by a factor of 2-3 not 10 for
> > optical drives) but what is worse is that at maximum throughput it will
> > use all available CPU in interrupt response.
>
> You'll never see 20MB/s *throughput* from a DVD-ROM. Again, you're
> conflating transfer rate and throughput.

I have seen 20 MB/s throughput from a DVD-ROM for the data in the
outer 10% or so of the disc. That is what happens when the drive hits 16x
speed so I am talking about real throughput speed media to memory. I've also
seen it writing to a DVD +R for longer periods on a 20x drive that usually
reaches 18x with the media I have to hand.

I will grant you that average throughput across the disc is nowhere
near 20MB/s.

--
C:>WIN | Directable Mirror Arrays
The computer obeys and wins. | A better way to focus the sun
You lose and Bill collects. | licences available see
| http://www.sohara.org/