aether propulsion ?
in [Math]
|
From: NoEinstein on 5 Mar 2010 05:36 On Mar 3, 11:41 am, master1729 <tommy1...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > you didnt answer my question > > why no aether propulsion ? > > tommy1729 Dear tommy1729: Who didn't answer your question? Your change of the subject relates to the engineering of spaceships, not to the basis of my New Science, and the present post. NoEinstein
From: NoEinstein on 5 Mar 2010 05:47 On Mar 3, 11:38 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > 100 YEARS OF QUANTUM PHYSICS > Max Plancks Unanswered Challenge > Caroline Hartmann > The accepted quantum theory still leaves unanswered the fundamental > questions raised by Max Plancks discovery of a century ago. What is > the structure of the atom, and how does it produce the results > measured by Plancks constant?http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/highlights/summ01TOC.html You are WAY off the subject of the present post! NoEinstein
From: spudnik on 5 Mar 2010 11:48 are you horning-in on the Wolframites -- did your daddy uncover an element of the periodical table, NoMendeleyeev? > my New Science, and the present post. NoEinstein thus: ah, a Reverse Engineer from the Shrine of Roswell, New Mexico -- OMG, shag me with a spoon, rolling on the floor, trying to supress laughter (in a library). thus quoth: When airliners are in level flight, and traveling at cruising speed, you are still being pushed back in your seat, slightly, by the ether flowing through the plane. You will notice that you seem to be walking up hill when going to the little plumbing room. read Alfven. in the meantime, positrons spiral in the opposite bubble-tracks to electrons, as has been known for decades. >How would you identify an individual positron if it was emited? thus: wow; what Al and PD said about the pointiness of electrons, I'd never read of, before; prove them wrong! thus: didn't finish, but it began rather nicely. also, see about Weber's "magnetic molecule" as http://21stcenturysciencetech.com -- or knot. > http://www.amperefitz.com/lawrm.htm thus: the speed of light depends upon the density of the medium, viz the index of refraction, cf. the brachistochrone (tautochrone) of Bernoulli and Liebniz, the cannonical problem that defined "the" caclulus. the speed of sound depends upon the density of the medium; about 600mph at sea-level; clearly, that is an upper bound on the speed of wind at sea-level! --Light: A History! http://wlym.com
From: master1729 on 6 Mar 2010 08:09 NoEinstein wrote : ( little sigh ) > On Mar 3, 11:41 am, master1729 <tommy1...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > you didnt answer my question > > > > why no aether propulsion ? > > > > tommy1729 > > Dear tommy1729: Who didn't answer your question? nobody answered my question. > Your change of the > subject relates to the engineering of spaceships, not > to the basis of > my New Science, and the present post. — NoEinstein — this is a physics thread ( in a math forum ! ) and you guys have been talking about ether for months or years. this is thus very suitable to ask the question here. btw you have avoided the question. but then again , so did everyone else of course ... as usual on sci.math ... tommy1729
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Arcs And Marks Next: THE MYSTERY OF THE CARROT. OH PARSNIP, WHEREFORE ART THOU? |