From: danny burstein on 18 Dec 2009 04:09 I'm helping set up some systems in a large open office where there's _lots_ of RF in the area, messing up 802.11. Running ethernet cable to each desk is pretty painful. Way, way, back there were infrared transceivers you could hook up for data transmission. True, they were quite slow by today's standards... Any suggestions for something avaiable today? Speed isn't too critical as these are mostly work stations with text material back and forth. Thanks. -- _____________________________________________________ Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key dannyb(a)panix.com [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
From: atec 7 7 "atec on 18 Dec 2009 07:03 danny burstein wrote: > I'm helping set up some systems in a large open office > where there's _lots_ of RF in the area, messing up 802.11. > > Running ethernet cable to each desk is pretty painful. > > Way, way, back there were infrared transceivers you could > hook up for data transmission. True, they were quite slow > by today's standards... > > Any suggestions for something avaiable today? Speed isn't > too critical as these are mostly work stations with text > material back and forth. > > Thanks. > have you scanned the 5.8 gig which has free space and cheap routers
From: danny burstein on 18 Dec 2009 14:05 In <hgfr1j$t7l$1(a)news.eternal-september.org> atec 7 7 <"atec 77"@hotmail.com> writes: >> >> Thanks. >> >have you scanned the 5.8 gig which has free space and cheap routers Not specifically but it's likely to be busy as well. The RF in the room is caused by lots and lots of motors and motor-gnerators and other big electrical nasties... Think of Dr. Frankenstein's laboratory. During a thunderstorm. But I will see if I cn hobble up a couple of 802.11a sets and see if it's any better. thanks -- _____________________________________________________ Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key dannyb(a)panix.com [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
From: DevilsPGD on 18 Dec 2009 14:06 In message <hgfgsq$t5v$1(a)reader1.panix.com> danny burstein <dannyb(a)panix.com> was claimed to have wrote: >I'm helping set up some systems in a large open office >where there's _lots_ of RF in the area, messing up 802.11. > >Running ethernet cable to each desk is pretty painful. > >Way, way, back there were infrared transceivers you could >hook up for data transmission. True, they were quite slow >by today's standards... > >Any suggestions for something avaiable today? Speed isn't >too critical as these are mostly work stations with text >material back and forth. The problem with IR is that any time anyone walks by the transceiver, everyone loses their connection. Honestly, I doubt you'll be happy with this solution long term.
From: atec 7 7 "atec on 18 Dec 2009 16:09 danny burstein wrote: > In <hgfr1j$t7l$1(a)news.eternal-september.org> atec 7 7 <"atec 77"@hotmail.com> writes: >>> Thanks. >>> >> have you scanned the 5.8 gig which has free space and cheap routers > > Not specifically but it's likely to be busy as well. The RF in > the room is caused by lots and lots of motors and motor-gnerators > and other big electrical nasties... > > Think of Dr. Frankenstein's laboratory. During a thunderstorm. > > But I will see if I cn hobble up a couple of 802.11a sets and see > if it's any better. thanks > > Maybe you know someone with a suitable spec analyser although testing by running is the best , there is modulated laser but it costs other than that sheilded cat6
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Wireless N router Next: Belkin Wireless Router Connection Problems/Hanging/Freezing |