Prev: Flushing output
Next: Mathematica emulation
From: Cecil Westerhof on 21 Dec 2009 21:42 tar(a)sevak.isi.edu (Thomas A. Russ) writes: > Or be even cleverer and test the parameters in reverse order in the > code. That way the set of messages gets constructed so that the final > result is the order in which you want to print them. I have thought about that, but when later parameters are depending on earlier parameters, that could spell trouble. So I stick to the reverse. > And to use a parameter, you can use some other more advanced FORMAT > options. First of all, the ~T directive could be used (Hyperspec > 22.3.6.1), together with the "v" parameter substitution item (22.3). That is a nice improvement. I'll implement it. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof |