From: Cecil Westerhof on
tar(a)sevak.isi.edu (Thomas A. Russ) writes:

> Or be even cleverer and test the parameters in reverse order in the
> code. That way the set of messages gets constructed so that the final
> result is the order in which you want to print them.

I have thought about that, but when later parameters are depending on
earlier parameters, that could spell trouble. So I stick to the reverse.

> And to use a parameter, you can use some other more advanced FORMAT
> options. First of all, the ~T directive could be used (Hyperspec
> 22.3.6.1), together with the "v" parameter substitution item (22.3).

That is a nice improvement. I'll implement it.

--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Flushing output
Next: Mathematica emulation