Prev: Ebay sniper software
Next: need cheap pressure sensor
From: dagmargoodboat on 24 May 2010 00:59 On May 23, 3:22 pm, Joerg <inva...(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote: > > On Sun, 23 May 2010 08:00:00 -0700, Joerg <inva...(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > > > If the Asian prices don't come down they'll get competition from the now > > cheaper US companies. Looks like a win to me. > > No win there. First, there are no US television or sneaker or clothes > manufacturers left. Even if there were or new ones would be sprouting up > they could not possibly compete with the made-in-China pair of $29.99 > jogging shoes that consumers have come to expect at places like Costco. > It would be, "Oh, look, we can make the same sneakers for $60 instead of > $75 because of the "fair tax". Big deal. > > >>>> and will be mighty miffed if he's a retiree. > >>> *That* is the component I'm not happy about. I don't see anyone addressing > >>> it, either. > > >> I did, many times over in this thread, but hardly anyone understands :-( > > > We did, but I don't see any of the talking heads recognize it, on either side. > > Then the whole thing should remain a non-starter. At least I hope so. Sorry, I spent yesterday talking in person to the actual Fair Tax guys, along with some U.S. congressmen. I'll chime in later, but for now I'm swamped and pooped, with a left-handed shovel and a whole lot of ____. Short version: no it's not in there, but yes, they're open to amending their bill so as to exempt savings that have already been taxed. Of all the alternatives, I still find it very appealing, especially compared to the current system. That doesn't mean I'm fully buying it yet--I still haven't considered all the possible gotchas. -- Cheers, James Arthur |